From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Block PMU during transitions
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 00:45:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3484357.R56niFO833@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8824147c-5512-a7a5-9e89-60b510111500@gmail.com>
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2022, 00:14:40 CEST schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> On 22. 4. 6. 10:48, Brian Norris wrote:
> > See the previous patch ("soc: rockchip: power-domain: Manage resource
> > conflicts with firmware") for a thorough explanation of the conflicts.
> > While ARM Trusted Firmware may be modifying memory controller and
> > power-domain states, we need to block the kernel's power-domain driver.
> >
> > If the power-domain driver is disabled, there is no resource conflict
> > and this becomes a no-op.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > index e494d1497d60..daff40702615 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> > #include <linux/suspend.h>
> >
> > +#include <soc/rockchip/pm_domains.h>
> > #include <soc/rockchip/rk3399_grf.h>
> > #include <soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h>
> >
> > @@ -93,6 +94,16 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dmcfreq->lock);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure power-domain transitions don't interfere with ARM Trusted
> > + * Firmware power-domain idling.
> > + */
> > + err = rockchip_pmu_block();
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to block PMU: %d\n", err);
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Some idle parameters may be based on the DDR controller clock, which
> > * is half of the DDR frequency.
> > @@ -198,6 +209,8 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> > dmcfreq->volt = target_volt;
> >
> > out:
> > + rockchip_pmu_unblock();
> > +out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&dmcfreq->lock);
> > return err;
> > }
>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
so I guess you're ok with me picking up both patches, right?
[Just making sure :-) ]
Thanks
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Block PMU during transitions
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 00:45:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3484357.R56niFO833@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8824147c-5512-a7a5-9e89-60b510111500@gmail.com>
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2022, 00:14:40 CEST schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> On 22. 4. 6. 10:48, Brian Norris wrote:
> > See the previous patch ("soc: rockchip: power-domain: Manage resource
> > conflicts with firmware") for a thorough explanation of the conflicts.
> > While ARM Trusted Firmware may be modifying memory controller and
> > power-domain states, we need to block the kernel's power-domain driver.
> >
> > If the power-domain driver is disabled, there is no resource conflict
> > and this becomes a no-op.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > index e494d1497d60..daff40702615 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> > #include <linux/suspend.h>
> >
> > +#include <soc/rockchip/pm_domains.h>
> > #include <soc/rockchip/rk3399_grf.h>
> > #include <soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h>
> >
> > @@ -93,6 +94,16 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dmcfreq->lock);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure power-domain transitions don't interfere with ARM Trusted
> > + * Firmware power-domain idling.
> > + */
> > + err = rockchip_pmu_block();
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to block PMU: %d\n", err);
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Some idle parameters may be based on the DDR controller clock, which
> > * is half of the DDR frequency.
> > @@ -198,6 +209,8 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> > dmcfreq->volt = target_volt;
> >
> > out:
> > + rockchip_pmu_unblock();
> > +out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&dmcfreq->lock);
> > return err;
> > }
>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
so I guess you're ok with me picking up both patches, right?
[Just making sure :-) ]
Thanks
Heiko
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Block PMU during transitions
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 00:45:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3484357.R56niFO833@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8824147c-5512-a7a5-9e89-60b510111500@gmail.com>
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2022, 00:14:40 CEST schrieb Chanwoo Choi:
> On 22. 4. 6. 10:48, Brian Norris wrote:
> > See the previous patch ("soc: rockchip: power-domain: Manage resource
> > conflicts with firmware") for a thorough explanation of the conflicts.
> > While ARM Trusted Firmware may be modifying memory controller and
> > power-domain states, we need to block the kernel's power-domain driver.
> >
> > If the power-domain driver is disabled, there is no resource conflict
> > and this becomes a no-op.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > index e494d1497d60..daff40702615 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> > #include <linux/suspend.h>
> >
> > +#include <soc/rockchip/pm_domains.h>
> > #include <soc/rockchip/rk3399_grf.h>
> > #include <soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h>
> >
> > @@ -93,6 +94,16 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dmcfreq->lock);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure power-domain transitions don't interfere with ARM Trusted
> > + * Firmware power-domain idling.
> > + */
> > + err = rockchip_pmu_block();
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to block PMU: %d\n", err);
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Some idle parameters may be based on the DDR controller clock, which
> > * is half of the DDR frequency.
> > @@ -198,6 +209,8 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> > dmcfreq->volt = target_volt;
> >
> > out:
> > + rockchip_pmu_unblock();
> > +out_unlock:
> > mutex_unlock(&dmcfreq->lock);
> > return err;
> > }
>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
so I guess you're ok with me picking up both patches, right?
[Just making sure :-) ]
Thanks
Heiko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-06 1:48 [RFC PATCH 0/2] rockchip / devfreq: Coordinate DRAM controller resources between ATF and kernel Brian Norris
2022-04-06 1:48 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-06 1:48 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-06 1:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Manage resource conflicts with firmware Brian Norris
2022-04-06 1:48 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-06 1:48 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-06 2:26 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-06 2:26 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-06 2:26 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-07 5:04 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-07 5:04 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-07 5:04 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-09 3:34 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-09 3:34 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-09 3:34 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-12 16:01 ` Peter Geis
2022-04-12 16:01 ` Peter Geis
2022-04-12 16:01 ` Peter Geis
2022-04-13 22:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-13 22:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-13 22:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-08 15:05 ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-05-08 15:05 ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-05-08 15:05 ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-04-06 1:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Block PMU during transitions Brian Norris
2022-04-06 1:48 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-06 1:48 ` Brian Norris
2022-04-06 2:26 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-06 2:26 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-06 2:26 ` Doug Anderson
2022-04-13 22:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-13 22:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-13 22:14 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-13 22:45 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2022-04-13 22:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-04-13 22:45 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-04-13 23:13 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-13 23:13 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-04-13 23:13 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-07 14:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-07 14:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-07 14:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-08 15:07 ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-05-08 15:07 ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-05-08 15:07 ` Heiko Stuebner
2022-05-08 18:42 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-08 18:42 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-08 18:42 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-08 18:40 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] rockchip / devfreq: Coordinate DRAM controller resources between ATF and kernel Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-08 18:40 ` Chanwoo Choi
2022-05-08 18:40 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3484357.R56niFO833@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=cwchoi00@gmail.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.