From: Ajay Bhargav <ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: CMD7:MMC_CMD_SELECT_CARD response fix
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 02:44:02 +0530 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <349448598.237430.1318799642143.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2034492837.237420.1318799477125.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
----- "Andy Fleming" <afleming@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I need to think about this. Was this causing you a problem? What
> were
> >> the symptoms?
> >>
> > yes... I am working on adding mmc support for Marvell GplugD board
> (Armada168 SoC). So during mmc startup, MMC_CMD_SELECT_CARD(CMD7) gets
> timed out. So digging more I found out that CMD7 in driver was
> expecting R1b instead of R1. I referred SD specs and JEDEC document
> for confirmation, and it clearly said in its footnote (which I added
> to patch description) that from stand-by to transfer mode response
> will be R1. I even crosschecked mmc driver in Kernel code, where in
> function mmc_select_card; CMD7 response is expected to be R1.
> >
> > I also checked if the standard SDHCI driver I am using is at fault
> or what, But I did not find any problem with mmc driver (sdhci.c). I
> then referred to blackfin SDH driver to see how they are handing
> this... so they are kind of bypassing this. According to specs, for
> R1b one should wait for CMD_SENT and data end flag to get set as card
> may send busy response. whereas blackfin driver simply checks if any
> of the flag is set it comes out of loop see code below for reference.
> >
> > ref bfin_sdh.c
> > [..]
> > ?/* wait for a while */
> > ? ? ? ?timeout = 0;
> > ? ? ? ?do {
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (++timeout > 1000000) {
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?status = CMD_TIME_OUT;
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break;
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?udelay(1);
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?status = bfin_read_SDH_STATUS();
> > ? ? ? ?} while (!(status & (CMD_SENT | CMD_RESP_END | CMD_TIME_OUT
> |
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CMD_CRC_FAIL)));
> >
> > Incase of sdhci, driver waits for response endlessly. till both
> SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE and SDHCI_INT_DATA_END flags are set.
> >
> > I hope I am able to clear the issue?
>
>
> Yes, that sounds fine, then. I'll apply it for this release.
>
waited long for this reply :D thanks...
Cheers!
Ajay Bhargav
next parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-16 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2034492837.237420.1318799477125.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
2011-10-16 21:14 ` Ajay Bhargav [this message]
[not found] <1875335715.200694.1318396495863.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com>
2011-10-12 5:22 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] mmc: CMD7:MMC_CMD_SELECT_CARD response fix Ajay Bhargav
2011-10-15 23:53 ` Andy Fleming
2011-10-20 6:24 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-10-05 13:13 Ajay Bhargav
2011-10-07 4:49 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-10-11 9:51 ` Ajay Bhargav
2011-10-11 16:39 ` Andy Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=349448598.237430.1318799642143.JavaMail.root@ahm.einfochips.com \
--to=ajay.bhargav@einfochips.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.