Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v8 3/5] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item

[Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5257 bytes --]

On 2023-11-02 07:13, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 31/10/2023 03:24, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> Rather than call free_job and run_job in same work item have a dedicated
>> work item for each. This aligns with the design and intended use of work
>> queues.
>>
>> v2:
>>     - Test for DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT before setting
>>       timestamp in free_job() work item (Danilo)
>> v3:
>>    - Drop forward dec of drm_sched_select_entity (Boris)
>>    - Return in drm_sched_run_job_work if entity NULL (Boris)
>> v4:
>>    - Replace dequeue with peek and invert logic (Luben)
>>    - Wrap to 100 lines (Luben)
>>    - Update comments for *_queue / *_queue_if_ready functions (Luben)
>> v5:
>>    - Drop peek argument, blindly reinit idle (Luben)
>>    - s/drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_ready/drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_done (Luben)
>>    - Update work_run_job & work_free_job kernel doc (Luben)
>> v6:
>>    - Do not move drm_sched_select_entity in file (Luben)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++--------
>>   include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h            |   4 +-
>>   2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>> index d1ae05bded15..3b1b2f8eafe8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>> @@ -265,6 +265,32 @@ static void drm_sched_run_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>   		queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_run_job);
>>   }
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue - enqueue free-job work
>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>> + */
>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>> +{
>> +	if (!READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>> +		queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched->work_free_job);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_done - enqueue free-job work if ready
>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>> + */
>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_done(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_sched_job *job;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock);
>> +	job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
>> +				       struct drm_sched_job, list);
>> +	if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
>> +		drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
>> +	spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * drm_sched_job_done - complete a job
>>    * @s_job: pointer to the job which is done
>> @@ -284,7 +310,7 @@ static void drm_sched_job_done(struct drm_sched_job *s_job, int result)
>>   	dma_fence_get(&s_fence->finished);
>>   	drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence, result);
>>   	dma_fence_put(&s_fence->finished);
>> -	drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
>> +	drm_sched_free_job_queue(sched);
>>   }
>>   
>>   /**
>> @@ -943,8 +969,10 @@ drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>   						typeof(*next), list);
>>   
>>   		if (next) {
>> -			next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
>> -				dma_fence_timestamp(&job->s_fence->finished);
>> +			if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
>> +				     &next->s_fence->scheduled.flags))
>> +				next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp =
>> +					dma_fence_timestamp(&job->s_fence->finished);
>>   			/* start TO timer for next job */
>>   			drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
>>   		}
>> @@ -994,7 +1022,40 @@ drm_sched_pick_best(struct drm_gpu_scheduler **sched_list,
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_pick_best);
>>   
>>   /**
>> - * drm_sched_run_job_work - main scheduler thread
>> + * drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready - enqueue run-job work if ready
>> + * @sched: scheduler instance
>> + */
>> +static void drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>> +{
>> +	if (drm_sched_select_entity(sched))
>> +		drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_sched_free_job_work - worker to call free_job
>> + *
>> + * @w: free job work
>> + */
>> +static void drm_sched_free_job_work(struct work_struct *w)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched =
>> +		container_of(w, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_free_job);
>> +	struct drm_sched_job *cleanup_job;
>> +
>> +	if (READ_ONCE(sched->pause_submit))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched);
>> +	if (cleanup_job) {
>> +		sched->ops->free_job(cleanup_job);
>> +
>> +		drm_sched_free_job_queue_if_done(sched);
>> +		drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready(sched);
> 
> Are finished jobs now disturbing the round robin selection?
> 
> Every time this cleans up a job we get:
> 
> drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready
>   -> drm_sched_select_entity
>       -> drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr
>           -> rq->current_entity bumped to next in list
> 
> So when the job run worker does:
> 
> 	entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched);
> 
> It does not pick the same entity as before this patch? If so perhaps 
> drm_sched_run_job_queue_if_ready needs a "peek" helper which does not 
> modify any state.

Hi Tvrtko,

Thank you for reporting this. I've sent out a patch.
-- 
Regards,
Luben

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 677 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 236 bytes --]