* "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-05 2:42 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-05 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Any clues about it? Short .config: # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 # Thu Jan 4 15:55:02 2007 # CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_64BIT=y CONFIG_X86=y ...... # # Network File Systems # CONFIG_NFS_FS=m CONFIG_NFS_V3=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y # CONFIG_NFS_V4 is not set CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO=y CONFIG_NFSD=m CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y CONFIG_LOCKD=m CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y CONFIG_EXPORTFS=m CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y CONFIG_SUNRPC=m CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3=m CONFIG_SMB_FS=m # CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT is not set CONFIG_CIFS=m CONFIG_CIFS_STATS=y # CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH is not set CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR=y CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX=y # CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set # CONFIG_NCP_FS is not set # CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set # CONFIG_AFS_FS is not set CONFIG_9P_FS=m ...... Thanks, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-05 2:42 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-05 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List Hi Neil, NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) # mount | grep suse localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Any clues about it? Short .config: # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1 # Thu Jan 4 15:55:02 2007 # CONFIG_X86_64=y CONFIG_64BIT=y CONFIG_X86=y ...... # # Network File Systems # CONFIG_NFS_FS=m CONFIG_NFS_V3=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y # CONFIG_NFS_V4 is not set CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO=y CONFIG_NFSD=m CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y CONFIG_NFSD_TCP=y CONFIG_LOCKD=m CONFIG_LOCKD_V4=y CONFIG_EXPORTFS=m CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m CONFIG_NFS_COMMON=y CONFIG_SUNRPC=m CONFIG_SUNRPC_GSS=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5=m CONFIG_RPCSEC_GSS_SPKM3=m CONFIG_SMB_FS=m # CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT is not set CONFIG_CIFS=m CONFIG_CIFS_STATS=y # CONFIG_CIFS_STATS2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_WEAK_PW_HASH is not set CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR=y CONFIG_CIFS_POSIX=y # CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG2 is not set # CONFIG_CIFS_EXPERIMENTAL is not set # CONFIG_NCP_FS is not set # CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set # CONFIG_AFS_FS is not set CONFIG_9P_FS=m ...... Thanks, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-05 12:25 ` Trond Myklebust 2007-01-05 12:48 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Trond Myklebust @ 2007-01-05 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: Neil Brown, linux-kernel Mailing List On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:42 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Neil, > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > # mount | grep suse > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) Are you perhaps running the userland NFS server instead of knfsd? The former will only support NFSv2. Trond ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-05 12:48 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-05 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: Neil Brown, linux-kernel Mailing List On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:25:39PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:42 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > > # mount | grep suse > > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) > > Are you perhaps running the userland NFS server instead of knfsd? The > former will only support NFSv2. I'm running kernel nfs servers: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5451 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5452 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5453 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5454 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5455 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5456 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5457 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5458 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5449 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5450 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5462 0.0 0.0 7940 672 ? Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5527 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ? Ss 19:30 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5538 0.0 0.0 23168 764 ? Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd My system is Debian etch. And I just found that CONFIG_NFSD_V4 is irrelevant, the message remains even if it is disabled. I'll check more kernel versions. Thanks, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-05 12:48 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-05 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: Neil Brown, linux-kernel Mailing List On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:25:39PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:42 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > > # mount | grep suse > > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) > > Are you perhaps running the userland NFS server instead of knfsd? The > former will only support NFSv2. I'm running kernel nfs servers: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5451 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5452 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5453 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5454 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5455 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5456 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5457 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5458 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 19:30 0:00 [nfsd] root 5449 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5450 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 19:30 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5462 0.0 0.0 7940 672 ? Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5527 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ? Ss 19:30 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5538 0.0 0.0 23168 764 ? Ss 19:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd My system is Debian etch. And I just found that CONFIG_NFSD_V4 is irrelevant, the message remains even if it is disabled. I'll check more kernel versions. Thanks, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-10 6:01 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-10 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Neil Brown @ 2007-01-10 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Friday January 5, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Neil, > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > # mount | grep suse > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) > > Any clues about it? Weird. Please try this patch. It should provide more useful information. NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> ### Diffstat output ./net/sunrpc/svc.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c --- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:58:14.000000000 +1100 +++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:59:55.000000000 +1100 @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ err_bad_prog: err_bad_vers: #ifdef RPC_PARANOIA - printk("svc: unknown version (%d)\n", vers); + printk("svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n", + vers, prog, progp->pg_name); #endif serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-10 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-10 15:15 ` Arnaud Giersch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-10 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Friday January 5, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > > # mount | grep suse > > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) > > > > Any clues about it? > > Weird. > > Please try this patch. It should provide more useful information. > > NeilBrown > > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> > > ### Diffstat output > ./net/sunrpc/svc.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c > --- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:58:14.000000000 +1100 > +++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:59:55.000000000 +1100 > @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ err_bad_prog: > > err_bad_vers: > #ifdef RPC_PARANOIA > - printk("svc: unknown version (%d)\n", vers); > + printk("svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n", > + vers, prog, progp->pg_name); > #endif > serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; > svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH); root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-10 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-10 15:15 ` Arnaud Giersch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-10 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Friday January 5, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > NFS mounting succeeded, but the kernel gives a warning. > > I'm running 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. > > > > # mount -o vers=3 localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 689.651606] svc: unknown version (3) > > # mount | grep suse > > localhost:/suse on /mnt type nfs (rw,nfsvers=3,addr=127.0.0.1) > > > > Any clues about it? > > Weird. > > Please try this patch. It should provide more useful information. > > NeilBrown > > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> > > ### Diffstat output > ./net/sunrpc/svc.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c ./net/sunrpc/svc.c > --- .prev/net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:58:14.000000000 +1100 > +++ ./net/sunrpc/svc.c 2007-01-10 16:59:55.000000000 +1100 > @@ -910,7 +910,8 @@ err_bad_prog: > > err_bad_vers: > #ifdef RPC_PARANOIA > - printk("svc: unknown version (%d)\n", vers); > + printk("svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n", > + vers, prog, progp->pg_name); > #endif > serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++; > svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROG_MISMATCH); root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y 2007-01-10 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-10 15:15 ` Arnaud Giersch 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Arnaud Giersch @ 2007-01-10 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu <at> gmail.com> writes: > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. I get the same log messages here with 2.6.19. I also noticed the following messages when starting rpc.nfsd: nfsd[1287]: nfssvc: writting fds to kernel failed: errno 0 (Success) nfsd[1287]: nfssvc: writting fds to kernel failed: errno 0 (Success) These messages appeared with kernel 2.6.19 too. I however don't know if this could be related to the other messages. I use nfs-utils 1.0.10 on Debian Etch. Arnaud Giersch ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-11 3:59 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-11 14:53 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Neil Brown @ 2007-01-11 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Wednesday January 10, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. Thanks. That helps a lot. This patch should help too. Please let me know. NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> ### Diffstat output ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.000000000 +1100 +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:57:03.000000000 +1100 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr .pg_prog = NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, .pg_vers = nfsd_acl_versions, - .pg_name = "nfsd", + .pg_name = "nfsacl", .pg_class = "nfsd", .pg_stats = &nfsd_acl_svcstats, .pg_authenticate = &svc_set_client, @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha break; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; #endif case NFSD_CLEAR: nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; #endif break; case NFSD_TEST: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-11 14:53 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-11 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List Neil, On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Wednesday January 10, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. # mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) # pss nfs USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5488 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5489 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5490 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5491 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5492 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5493 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5494 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5495 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] # pss rpc USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5486 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5487 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5499 0.0 0.0 7944 668 ? Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5567 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ? Ss 22:16 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5578 0.0 0.0 23180 652 ? Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd Thanks, Wu > > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> > > ### Diffstat output > ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.000000000 +1100 > +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:57:03.000000000 +1100 > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr > .pg_prog = NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, > .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, > .pg_vers = nfsd_acl_versions, > - .pg_name = "nfsd", > + .pg_name = "nfsacl", > .pg_class = "nfsd", > .pg_stats = &nfsd_acl_svcstats, > .pg_authenticate = &svc_set_client, > @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha > break; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > #endif > case NFSD_CLEAR: > nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; > #endif > break; > case NFSD_TEST: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-11 14:53 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-11 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List Neil, On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Wednesday January 10, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. # mount localhost:/suse /mnt [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) # pss nfs USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5488 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5489 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5490 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5491 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5492 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5493 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5494 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] root 5495 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 22:16 0:00 [nfsd] # pss rpc USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 5486 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/0] root 5487 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 22:16 0:00 [rpciod/1] root 5499 0.0 0.0 7944 668 ? Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.mountd statd 5567 0.0 0.0 7892 1084 ? Ss 22:16 0:00 /sbin/rpc.statd root 5578 0.0 0.0 23180 652 ? Ss 22:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd Thanks, Wu > > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> > > ### Diffstat output > ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.000000000 +1100 > +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:57:03.000000000 +1100 > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr > .pg_prog = NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, > .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, > .pg_vers = nfsd_acl_versions, > - .pg_name = "nfsd", > + .pg_name = "nfsacl", > .pg_class = "nfsd", > .pg_stats = &nfsd_acl_svcstats, > .pg_authenticate = &svc_set_client, > @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha > break; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > #endif > case NFSD_CLEAR: > nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; > #endif > break; > case NFSD_TEST: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-11 22:04 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-12 2:32 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Neil Brown @ 2007-01-11 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Thursday January 11, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > Neil, > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > On Wednesday January 10, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. > > # mount localhost:/suse /mnt > [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel with the patch applied? Because at the very least it should have changed the message to > [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) NeilBrown ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-12 2:32 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-12 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:04:15AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Thursday January 11, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > Neil, > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > On Wednesday January 10, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > > > > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > > > > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. > > > > # mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel > with the patch applied? > Because at the very least it should have changed the message to Oh, sorry. I recompiled & installed kernel and it output this new message: [ 133.129919] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) Regards, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-12 2:32 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-12 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 09:04:15AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > On Thursday January 11, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > Neil, > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:59:07PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > On Wednesday January 10, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > root ~# mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > > > [ 132.678204] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > > > > > > > I've confirmed that 2.6.20-rc2-mm1, 2.6.20-rc3-mm1, 2.6.19-rc6-mm1 all > > > > have this warning, while 2.6.17-2-amd64 is good. > > > > > > Thanks. That helps a lot. > > > > > > This patch should help too. Please let me know. > > > > # mount localhost:/suse /mnt > > [ 2058.438236] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsd) > > Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel > with the patch applied? > Because at the very least it should have changed the message to Oh, sorry. I recompiled & installed kernel and it output this new message: [ 133.129919] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) Regards, Wu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-12 19:43 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-13 2:13 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Neil Brown @ 2007-01-12 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Friday January 12, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > > Are you really really double-plus sure that you are running a kernel > > with the patch applied? > > Because at the very least it should have changed the message to > > Oh, sorry. I recompiled & installed kernel and it output this new message: > > [ 133.129919] svc: unknown version (3 for prog 100227, nfsacl) > Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code...... Probably this 'break' in the wrong place... Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to where it should be. Thanks, NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> ### Diffstat output ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.000000000 +1100 +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-13 06:40:12.000000000 +1100 @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr .pg_prog = NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, .pg_vers = nfsd_acl_versions, - .pg_name = "nfsd", + .pg_name = "nfsacl", .pg_class = "nfsd", .pg_stats = &nfsd_acl_svcstats, .pg_authenticate = &svc_set_client, @@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha switch(change) { case NFSD_SET: nfsd_versions[vers] = nfsd_version[vers]; - break; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; #endif + break; case NFSD_CLEAR: nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; #endif break; case NFSD_TEST: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-13 2:13 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-13 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:43:07AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code...... > > Probably this 'break' in the wrong place... > > Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to > where it should be. Now it worked :) Thanks, Wu > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> > > ### Diffstat output > ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.000000000 +1100 > +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-13 06:40:12.000000000 +1100 > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr > .pg_prog = NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, > .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, > .pg_vers = nfsd_acl_versions, > - .pg_name = "nfsd", > + .pg_name = "nfsacl", > .pg_class = "nfsd", > .pg_stats = &nfsd_acl_svcstats, > .pg_authenticate = &svc_set_client, > @@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha > switch(change) { > case NFSD_SET: > nfsd_versions[vers] = nfsd_version[vers]; > - break; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > #endif > + break; > case NFSD_CLEAR: > nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; > #endif > break; > case NFSD_TEST: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-13 2:13 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2007-01-13 2:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Neil Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:43:07AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code...... > > Probably this 'break' in the wrong place... > > Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to > where it should be. Now it worked :) Thanks, Wu > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> > > ### Diffstat output > ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c > --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-11 14:55:38.000000000 +1100 > +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2007-01-13 06:40:12.000000000 +1100 > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static struct svc_program nfsd_acl_progr > .pg_prog = NFS_ACL_PROGRAM, > .pg_nvers = NFSD_ACL_NRVERS, > .pg_vers = nfsd_acl_versions, > - .pg_name = "nfsd", > + .pg_name = "nfsacl", > .pg_class = "nfsd", > .pg_stats = &nfsd_acl_svcstats, > .pg_authenticate = &svc_set_client, > @@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ int nfsd_vers(int vers, enum vers_op cha > switch(change) { > case NFSD_SET: > nfsd_versions[vers] = nfsd_version[vers]; > - break; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = nfsd_acl_version[vers]; > #endif > + break; > case NFSD_CLEAR: > nfsd_versions[vers] = NULL; > #if defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V2_ACL) || defined(CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL) > if (vers < NFSD_ACL_NRVERS) > - nfsd_acl_version[vers] = NULL; > + nfsd_acl_versions[vers] = NULL; > #endif > break; > case NFSD_TEST: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y @ 2007-01-14 22:32 ` Neil Brown 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Neil Brown @ 2007-01-14 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fengguang Wu; +Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List On Saturday January 13, fengguang.wu@gmail.com wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 06:43:07AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote: > > > > Ok, thanks. I must have missed something else wrong in the code...... > > > > Probably this 'break' in the wrong place... > > > > Could you try this patch instead please - or just move the 'break' to > > where it should be. > > Now it worked :) Thanks. I'll try to get those fixes into 2.6.20... NeilBrown ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-14 22:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-01-05 2:42 "svc: unknown version (3)" when CONFIG_NFSD_V4=y Fengguang Wu 2007-01-05 2:42 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-05 12:25 ` Trond Myklebust 2007-01-05 12:48 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-05 12:48 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-10 6:01 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-10 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-10 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-10 15:15 ` Arnaud Giersch 2007-01-11 3:59 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-11 14:53 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-11 14:53 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-11 22:04 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-12 2:32 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-12 2:32 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-12 19:43 ` Neil Brown 2007-01-13 2:13 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-13 2:13 ` Fengguang Wu 2007-01-14 22:32 ` Neil Brown
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.