All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	"M. Edward Borasky" <znmeb@aracnet.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea@suse.de, akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed?
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:48:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <372130000.1022093280@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0205221528070.14140-100000@imladris.surriel.com>

>> don't want to upgrade your CPU's, it's a _whole_ lot easier to just have a
>> magic "map_large_page()" system call, and start using the 2MB page support
>> of the x86.
>> 
>> And no, this should NOT be a mmap.
>> 
>> It's a magic x86-only system call,
> 
>> Making the _generic_ code jump through hoops because some stupid special
>> case that nobody else is interested in is bad.
> 
> Actually, I suspect that MIPS, x86-64 and other
> architectures are also interested ...

Indeed. Even if you happen to have a spare 10Gb of RAM, and can address it
efficiently, that's still no reason to blow it on mindless copies of data ;-)

M.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-05-22 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-22  6:51 2.4.19pre*: IO statistics in /proc/partitions corrupt Jochen Suckfuell
2002-05-22 14:00 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? M. Edward Borasky
2002-05-22 14:08   ` bert hubert
2002-05-22 14:55     ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 15:56       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:23         ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 21:46         ` Doug Ledford
2002-05-22 14:36   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 15:44     ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 15:53       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:07       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 16:36         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:21           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 18:18             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 18:02         ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:08           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:30             ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-22 18:40               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:48               ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-05-22 18:34             ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:27               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 20:30             ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 21:18               ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 21:23                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 22:35                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 22:44                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-28  2:08                 ` Wim Coekaerts
2002-05-31 20:39                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-23 14:16             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 17:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 19:34                 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 19:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:38           ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:50       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 17:54         ` J Sloan
2002-05-22 18:22           ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 22:14             ` J Sloan
2002-05-22 18:24         ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 22:05           ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-22 14:29 Alastair Stevens
     [not found] <E17AaR0-0002QM-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205221048570.23621-100000@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-05-22 20:23   ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-22 20:58     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 12:40       ` Mike Jagdis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=372130000.1022093280@flay \
    --to=martin.bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=znmeb@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.