From: J Sloan <jjs@lexus.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:14:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CEC1828.5050209@lexus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17AakK-0002UE-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox wrote:
>>Huh? RH 7.3 kernel has the O(1) scheduler merged?
>>
>>If the RH kernel is anything like the 2.4.19-pre8-ac5
>>I'm currently running, that is sweet indeed.
>>
>>
>
>rpm -q --changelog |grep "O(1)"
>
>
>
Yes, I was being lazy - but now that finals
are done with for now, I'll grab that kernel
source rpm and have a proper look at it.
Thanks,
Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-22 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-22 6:51 2.4.19pre*: IO statistics in /proc/partitions corrupt Jochen Suckfuell
2002-05-22 14:00 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? M. Edward Borasky
2002-05-22 14:08 ` bert hubert
2002-05-22 14:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 15:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 21:46 ` Doug Ledford
2002-05-22 14:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 15:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 15:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 16:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 18:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 18:02 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-22 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 18:34 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 20:30 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 21:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 22:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 22:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-28 2:08 ` Wim Coekaerts
2002-05-31 20:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-23 14:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 19:34 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:50 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 17:54 ` J Sloan
2002-05-22 18:22 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 22:14 ` J Sloan [this message]
2002-05-22 18:24 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 22:05 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-22 14:29 Alastair Stevens
2002-05-22 14:52 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CEC1828.5050209@lexus.com \
--to=jjs@lexus.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.