* Re: Re: Re: [Problem]NFS Server – Um?ount results in Device Busy.
@ 2012-05-11 8:37 ` AMIT SAHRAWAT
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: AMIT SAHRAWAT @ 2012-05-11 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Namjae Jeon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^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Re: [Problem]NFS Server – Um?ount results in Device Busy.
@ 2012-05-11 8:37 ` AMIT SAHRAWAT
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: AMIT SAHRAWAT @ 2012-05-11 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Namjae Jeon
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252, Size: 1768 bytes --]
Hi Bruce,
Sorry it was the mail composer - I did not check mark the plain text option.
We need an opinion.
We will be using around 15 NFS client mounted - with one NFS Server. We are try to make out how many NFSD should we start at the NFS Server.
It all depends upon the load - these 15 NFS clients are going to generate. But is there any default number - we should use to start with? like 1 per NFS client mount?
Please share your advise on this.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
------- Original Message -------
Sender : J. Bruce Fields<bfields@fieldses.org>
Date : May 10, 2012 17:46 (GMT+05:30)
Title : Re: Re: [Problem]NFS Server Um?ount results in Device Busy.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:54:43AM +0000, AMIT SAHRAWAT wrote:
>
>
Hi Bruce,
>
>
Thanks for instant reply.
Could you turn off html formatting on your mail?
>
The option you mentioned is working. 'exportfs -f'
>
Actually it is not mentioned anywhere - even when checked for options:
>
#> exportfs -h
exportfs: invalid option -- 'h'
usage: exportfs [-aruv] [host:/path]
Sorry, it looks like the help test could be improved! Patches
welcomed....
It is documented in the exportfs man page.
>
But - when tried to give - '-f' option it is working.
>
Then on checking the code for exportfs - got to know the working of '-f' option.
>
I think it should work. I will check with a number of scenario - to check there is no blockage for other mount points - at the time 'exportfs -f' is being run. Please reply if it wont :)
If no clients are using the export, it should work.
--b.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawatÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-11 8:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-11 8:37 Re: Re: [Problem]NFS Server – Um?ount results in Device Busy AMIT SAHRAWAT
2012-05-11 8:37 ` AMIT SAHRAWAT
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.