All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] [RFC][PATCH] fs-writeback: redefining the dirty inode queues
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:34:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <386727659.27809@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20070810063412.238042387@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)

Andrew,

I'd like to propose a cleaner way of using the s_dirty, s_io, s_more_io
queues for the writeback of dirty inodes. The basic idea is to clearly
define the function of the queues, especially to decouple s_diry from
s_io/s_more_io.  The details are in the changelog of patch 2.

The patches are some cleanups on top of Andrew's s_dirty time-ordering
patches and Ken's s_more_io patch:

[PATCH 1/4] writeback: check time-ordering of s_io and s_more_io
[PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule
[PATCH 3/4] writeback: function renames and cleanups
[PATCH 4/4] writeback: fix ntfs with sb_has_dirty_inodes()

 fs/fs-writeback.c  |  196 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 fs/ntfs/super.c    |    4 
 include/linux/fs.h |    1 
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

Note that the patches need rework for inserting into the right place of
your queue of -mm patches. I'll take care of it in the next take.

Thank you,
Fengguang
-- 

             reply	other threads:[~2007-08-10  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-10  6:34 Fengguang Wu [this message]
2007-08-10  6:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] [RFC][PATCH] fs-writeback: redefining the dirty inode queues Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] writeback: check time-ordering of s_io and s_more_io Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 16:47   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 16:47     ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 17:05     ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 17:05       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 17:05       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] writeback: function renames and cleanups Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34   ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] writeback: fix ntfs with sb_has_dirty_inodes() Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10  6:34   ` Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=386727659.27809@ustc.edu.cn \
    --to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kenchen@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.