* [linux-lvm] Re: Problems with 0.8pre tools (fwd)
@ 2000-02-03 12:36 Michael Marxmeier
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Marxmeier @ 2000-02-03 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Forwarded message ...
-------- Original Message --------
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:51:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Jim Cain <me@jimcain.net>
Subject: Re: Problems with 0.8pre tools
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Jim Cain wrote:
> All,
>
> I had some problems getting the tools to build. First, in
> tools/lib/liblvm.h, the included file <linux/lvm.h> did not compile
> because the reference to spinlock_t on line 573 was unknown. I added an
> #include <linux/spinlock.h> to liblvm.h, and everything in the lib
> directory built fine.
>
> Next, in tools/lvmchange.c on line 160, the identifier LVM_RESET was
> unknown. This is defined in <linux/lvm.h>, but only if LVM_TOTAL_RESET is
> defined. I removed the #ifdef around it so that LVM_RESET is always
> defined. After that change, the tools built okay.
>
> Well, not completely okay. Because when I do the following:
>
> pvcreate /dev/hd[bc]1
> vgcreate vg01 /dev/hd[bc]1
>
> the vgcreate command dumps core on a segmentation fault. I'm wondering if
> any of the fixes I made were incomplete or the wrong way to fix it.
>
> This is being built on kernel 2.3.40 with the 0.8i patch.
I should have also mentioned that I made the changes to
tools/lib/lvm_tab_vg_check_exist_all_vg.c that Heinz describes in his
message on Jan. 1. I get no output from vgcreate at all, just the seg
fault.
Cheers,
Jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-02-03 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-03 12:36 [linux-lvm] Re: Problems with 0.8pre tools (fwd) Michael Marxmeier
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.