From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] clk: rockchip: don't mark clock names as initconst
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 23:05:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3926467.jaQRQH5bEO@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6692523.e5K11FUKe0@wuerfel>
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 22:50:43 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 18:06:30 Heiko St=FCbner wrote:
> > "[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix section mismatches with new child-clock=
s" [0]
> >=20
> > should be in Mike's + Stephen's inbox since last week as well, whic=
h moves
> > the offending new elements into separate entities, which can have
> > __initdata attributes again.
> >=20
> >=20
> > Heiko
> >=20
> > [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg471295.html
>=20
> The patch looks good, but for some reason, the next-20151223 kernel h=
ad no
> problem and next-20151231 was broken, the top commits in
> drivers/clk/rockchips are:
That is correct. next-20151223 did not contain the offending patches ye=
t.=20
After the patches got merged into the clock-tree the kbuild-robot alert=
ed us=20
to the __initdata issue, so I created the linked patch as fixup.
Heiko
>=20
> commit a915e30dd26ea5f3cc2e2c044aba38ee5973d3fa
> Merge: ce6dd266d535 b0158bb27c7b
> Author: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Date: Wed Dec 23 13:08:56 2015 -0800
>=20
> Merge branch 'clk-rockchip' into clk-next
>=20
> commit b0158bb27c7b6e9843f541c17b24dbd964b76db6
> Author: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 22 22:28:01 2015 +0100
>=20
> clk: rockchip: rk3036: include downstream muxes into fractional d=
ividers
>=20
> Use the newly introduced possibility to combine the fractional di=
viders
>=20
>=20
> =09Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BUG] clk: rockchip: don't mark clock names as initconst
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 23:05:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3926467.jaQRQH5bEO@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6692523.e5K11FUKe0@wuerfel>
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 22:50:43 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 18:06:30 Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > "[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix section mismatches with new child-clocks" [0]
> >
> > should be in Mike's + Stephen's inbox since last week as well, which moves
> > the offending new elements into separate entities, which can have
> > __initdata attributes again.
> >
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> > [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg471295.html
>
> The patch looks good, but for some reason, the next-20151223 kernel had no
> problem and next-20151231 was broken, the top commits in
> drivers/clk/rockchips are:
That is correct. next-20151223 did not contain the offending patches yet.
After the patches got merged into the clock-tree the kbuild-robot alerted us
to the __initdata issue, so I created the linked patch as fixup.
Heiko
>
> commit a915e30dd26ea5f3cc2e2c044aba38ee5973d3fa
> Merge: ce6dd266d535 b0158bb27c7b
> Author: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Date: Wed Dec 23 13:08:56 2015 -0800
>
> Merge branch 'clk-rockchip' into clk-next
>
> commit b0158bb27c7b6e9843f541c17b24dbd964b76db6
> Author: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 22 22:28:01 2015 +0100
>
> clk: rockchip: rk3036: include downstream muxes into fractional dividers
>
> Use the newly introduced possibility to combine the fractional dividers
>
>
> Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [BUG] clk: rockchip: don't mark clock names as initconst
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 23:05:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3926467.jaQRQH5bEO@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6692523.e5K11FUKe0@wuerfel>
Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 22:50:43 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 18:06:30 Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > "[PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix section mismatches with new child-clocks" [0]
> >
> > should be in Mike's + Stephen's inbox since last week as well, which moves
> > the offending new elements into separate entities, which can have
> > __initdata attributes again.
> >
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> > [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg471295.html
>
> The patch looks good, but for some reason, the next-20151223 kernel had no
> problem and next-20151231 was broken, the top commits in
> drivers/clk/rockchips are:
That is correct. next-20151223 did not contain the offending patches yet.
After the patches got merged into the clock-tree the kbuild-robot alerted us
to the __initdata issue, so I created the linked patch as fixup.
Heiko
>
> commit a915e30dd26ea5f3cc2e2c044aba38ee5973d3fa
> Merge: ce6dd266d535 b0158bb27c7b
> Author: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Date: Wed Dec 23 13:08:56 2015 -0800
>
> Merge branch 'clk-rockchip' into clk-next
>
> commit b0158bb27c7b6e9843f541c17b24dbd964b76db6
> Author: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 22 22:28:01 2015 +0100
>
> clk: rockchip: rk3036: include downstream muxes into fractional dividers
>
> Use the newly introduced possibility to combine the fractional dividers
>
>
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-01 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-01 13:42 [PATCH] [BUG] clk: rockchip: don't mark clock names as initconst Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 17:06 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-01 17:06 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-01 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 21:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-01 22:05 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2016-01-01 22:05 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-01 22:05 ` Heiko Stübner
2016-01-02 21:42 ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-02 21:42 ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-02 21:42 ` Michael Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3926467.jaQRQH5bEO@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.