All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, vicencb@gmail.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com,
	enric.balletbo@collabora.com, pbrobinson@gmail.com,
	tom@vamrs.com, dev@vamrs.com, stephen@vamrs.com,
	amit.kucheria@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add 96Boards Rock960 CE board support
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:55:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3932568.1d4PiNsIum@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a40ed76f22fd43f68af07d9bb56a0ff38171eef9.camel@collabora.com>

Am Freitag, 14. September 2018, 19:42:51 CEST schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 23:35 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > This patchset adds 96Boards Rock960 CE board support. Rock960 CE
> > (Consumer Edition) board is one of the member of 96Boards Consumer
> > Edition and AI platform and is manufactured by Vamrs Limited. Most of
> > the board configuration is shared with the Ficus board manufactured by
> > vamrs, which is an Enterprise 96Board.
> > 
> > For the sake of avoiding code duplication, a common rock960.dtsi file
> > with common DT nodes for both boards and separate board specific DTS
> > files has been added.
> > 
> > To be specific, below are some of the key differences between both
> > boards:
> > 
> > 1. Different host enable GPIO for USB
> > 2. Different power and reset GPIO for PCI-E
> > 3. No Ethernet port on Rock960
> > 
> > While adding the board support, SD card Chip detection support is also
> > added to the common dtsi file, shared by both boards.
> > 
> > This series has been tested on Rock960 CE v1.2 board.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > 
> > * Moved usb and pcie nodes to common dtsi and kept only the properties
> >   which differ in board specific dts.
> > * Updated the common dtsi commit description.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 
> > * Changed the board compatible to "vamrs,rock960"
> > 
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: Split out common nodes for Rock960 based boards
> >   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board
> >   arm64: boot: dts: rockchip: Add support for Rock960 board
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable SD card detection for Rock960 boards
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt      |   4 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-ficus.dts | 524 +----------------
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts      |  52 ++
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi     | 542 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 519 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi
> > 
> 
> Looks pretty good!
> 
> When applying this series, I noticed that it conflicts with
> 
> commit 8bb878cf20ae10809c36db96993bfce7026d062b
> Author: Levin Du <djw@t-chip.com.cn>
> Date:   Mon Jul 30 10:12:01 2018 +0800
> 
>     arm64: dts: rockchip: add support for ROC-RK3399-PC board
> 
> resolution is trivial, but you might want to rebase and resend,
> to make Heiko's life easier.

nah, that's ok as it is ;-)
Such a Makefile conflict I can fix up myself.

As it looks pretty good, I'd like to just give Rob a chance
to look at the added binding before applying.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add 96Boards Rock960 CE board support
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:55:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3932568.1d4PiNsIum@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a40ed76f22fd43f68af07d9bb56a0ff38171eef9.camel@collabora.com>

Am Freitag, 14. September 2018, 19:42:51 CEST schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 23:35 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > This patchset adds 96Boards Rock960 CE board support. Rock960 CE
> > (Consumer Edition) board is one of the member of 96Boards Consumer
> > Edition and AI platform and is manufactured by Vamrs Limited. Most of
> > the board configuration is shared with the Ficus board manufactured by
> > vamrs, which is an Enterprise 96Board.
> > 
> > For the sake of avoiding code duplication, a common rock960.dtsi file
> > with common DT nodes for both boards and separate board specific DTS
> > files has been added.
> > 
> > To be specific, below are some of the key differences between both
> > boards:
> > 
> > 1. Different host enable GPIO for USB
> > 2. Different power and reset GPIO for PCI-E
> > 3. No Ethernet port on Rock960
> > 
> > While adding the board support, SD card Chip detection support is also
> > added to the common dtsi file, shared by both boards.
> > 
> > This series has been tested on Rock960 CE v1.2 board.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > 
> > * Moved usb and pcie nodes to common dtsi and kept only the properties
> >   which differ in board specific dts.
> > * Updated the common dtsi commit description.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 
> > * Changed the board compatible to "vamrs,rock960"
> > 
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: Split out common nodes for Rock960 based boards
> >   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board
> >   arm64: boot: dts: rockchip: Add support for Rock960 board
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable SD card detection for Rock960 boards
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt      |   4 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-ficus.dts | 524 +----------------
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts      |  52 ++
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi     | 542 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 519 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi
> > 
> 
> Looks pretty good!
> 
> When applying this series, I noticed that it conflicts with
> 
> commit 8bb878cf20ae10809c36db96993bfce7026d062b
> Author: Levin Du <djw@t-chip.com.cn>
> Date:   Mon Jul 30 10:12:01 2018 +0800
> 
>     arm64: dts: rockchip: add support for ROC-RK3399-PC board
> 
> resolution is trivial, but you might want to rebase and resend,
> to make Heiko's life easier.

nah, that's ok as it is ;-)
Such a Makefile conflict I can fix up myself.

As it looks pretty good, I'd like to just give Rob a chance
to look at the added binding before applying.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-14 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-13 18:05 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add 96Boards Rock960 CE board support Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Split out common nodes for Rock960 based boards Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-26 21:06   ` Rob Herring
2018-09-26 21:06     ` Rob Herring
2018-09-26 21:06     ` Rob Herring
2018-09-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: boot: dts: rockchip: Add support " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable SD card detection for Rock960 boards Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-13 18:05   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-14 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Add 96Boards Rock960 CE board support Ezequiel Garcia
2018-09-14 17:42   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-09-14 17:55   ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2018-09-14 17:55     ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-09-22 20:57 ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-09-22 20:57   ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3932568.1d4PiNsIum@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=dev@vamrs.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
    --cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=stephen@vamrs.com \
    --cc=tom@vamrs.com \
    --cc=vicencb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.