* [BUG?] kflushd launders without washing powder ???
@ 2000-10-21 17:20 Roger Larsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Roger Larsson @ 2000-10-21 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel, linux-mm@kvack.org
Hi,
I am still experimenting with the VM code.
During this exploration I stumbled into this code,
from kflushd in fs/buffer.c
flushed = flush_dirty_buffers(0);
if (free_shortage())
flushed += page_launder(GFP_BUFFER, 0);
a) GFP_BUFFER is __GFP_HIGH and __GFP_WAIT but not __GFP_IO
Trying to launder without washing powder???
Or is it somehow guaranteed that flushed buffers are from
the same pages?
Should a GFP_KFLUSHD be introduced - like GFP_KSWAPD ?
b) Where is no_of_inactive_dirty pages balanced against inactive_clean?
(I have to look some more at this - remove my own patches first...)
/RogerL
--
Home page:
http://www.norran.net/nra02596/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-10-21 17:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-10-21 17:20 [BUG?] kflushd launders without washing powder ??? Roger Larsson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.