From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: mike.leach@linaro.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
leo.yan@linaro.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
swboyd@chromium.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] coresight: dynamic-replicator: Fix handling of multiple connections
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 16:59:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39a2b3fff165a108fa59d72b630b5f14@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <906d374d-a4d6-f2f2-6845-88b97a5ff7d9@arm.com>
Hi Suzuki,
Thanks for looking into this issue.
On 2020-04-07 15:54, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 04/07/2020 10:46 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>
> There seems to be two replicators back to back here. What is connected
> to the other output of both of them ? Are there any TPIUs ? What
> happens
> if you choose a sink on the other end of "swao_replicator" (ETB ?)
>
The other outport of swao replicator is connected to EUD which is a
QCOM specific HW which can be used as a sink like USB.
And the other outport of other replicator(replicator_out) is connected
to
TPIU.
> After boot, what do the idfilter registers read for both the
> replicators ?
>
Added some prints in replicator_probe.
replicator probe ret=-517 devname=6046000.replicator idfilter0=0x0
idfilter1=0x0
replicator probe ret=0 devname=6b06000.replicator idfilter0=0xff
idfilter1=0xff
replicator probe ret=0 devname=6046000.replicator idfilter0=0xff
idfilter1=0xff
>
> I believe we need to properly assign the TRACE_IDs for tracing
> sessions,
> (rather than static ids) in a way such that we could filter them and
> use
> the multiple sinks in parallel for separate trace sessions and this is
> not simple (involves kernel driver changes and the perf tool to be able
> to decode the trace id changes too).
>
>
> So for the moment, we need to :
>
> 1) Disallow turning the replicator ON, when it is already turned ON
> 2) Do what your patch does. i.e, disable the other end while one end
> is turned on.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
Sounds good to me, Mike would have some comments.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
swboyd@chromium.org, leo.yan@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mike.leach@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] coresight: dynamic-replicator: Fix handling of multiple connections
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 16:59:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39a2b3fff165a108fa59d72b630b5f14@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <906d374d-a4d6-f2f2-6845-88b97a5ff7d9@arm.com>
Hi Suzuki,
Thanks for looking into this issue.
On 2020-04-07 15:54, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 04/07/2020 10:46 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>
> There seems to be two replicators back to back here. What is connected
> to the other output of both of them ? Are there any TPIUs ? What
> happens
> if you choose a sink on the other end of "swao_replicator" (ETB ?)
>
The other outport of swao replicator is connected to EUD which is a
QCOM specific HW which can be used as a sink like USB.
And the other outport of other replicator(replicator_out) is connected
to
TPIU.
> After boot, what do the idfilter registers read for both the
> replicators ?
>
Added some prints in replicator_probe.
replicator probe ret=-517 devname=6046000.replicator idfilter0=0x0
idfilter1=0x0
replicator probe ret=0 devname=6b06000.replicator idfilter0=0xff
idfilter1=0xff
replicator probe ret=0 devname=6046000.replicator idfilter0=0xff
idfilter1=0xff
>
> I believe we need to properly assign the TRACE_IDs for tracing
> sessions,
> (rather than static ids) in a way such that we could filter them and
> use
> the multiple sinks in parallel for separate trace sessions and this is
> not simple (involves kernel driver changes and the perf tool to be able
> to decode the trace id changes too).
>
>
> So for the moment, we need to :
>
> 1) Disallow turning the replicator ON, when it is already turned ON
> 2) Do what your patch does. i.e, disable the other end while one end
> is turned on.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
Sounds good to me, Mike would have some comments.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-07 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-05 10:28 [RFC PATCH] coresight: dynamic-replicator: Fix handling of multiple connections Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-05 10:28 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-06 10:55 ` Mike Leach
2020-04-06 10:55 ` Mike Leach
2020-04-07 9:46 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-07 9:46 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-07 10:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-07 10:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-07 11:29 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2020-04-07 11:29 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-07 13:08 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-07 13:08 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-07 13:56 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-07 13:56 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-07 14:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-07 14:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-07 15:18 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-07 15:18 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-08 22:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-08 22:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-09 7:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-04-09 7:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-04-09 7:51 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-09 7:51 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-09 9:17 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-09 9:17 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2020-04-09 9:34 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-09 9:34 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-23 12:21 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-04-23 12:21 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39a2b3fff165a108fa59d72b630b5f14@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.