Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-test10)

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>]

kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> > that does hardware register access without protecting against interrupts
> > or checking if the interface is up.
> 
> This issue is not that issue. It is separate issue and in fact
> it is private problem of driver and its author, what is safe,
> what is not safe.
> 
> F.e. I see no cathastrophe even if MII registers are accessed without
> any protections. Diag utilities do this from user space. 8)8)

It depends on the hardware...  For the ioctl-only case, you are
correct.  rtnl_lock protects us there.  But when the timer and ioctl
both call mdio_xxx, you need SMP protection, otherwise you corrupt the
multi-step MDIO read/write found in many drivers.

IMNSHO the timer routines found in net drivers should all be converted
to kernel threads.  There are too many limitations placed on you by
timers.


> > de4x5 is probably also buggy in regard to this.
> 
> de4x5 is hopeless. I added nice comment in softnet to it.
> Unfortunately it was lost. 8)
> 
> Andi, neither you nor me nor Alan nor anyone are able to audit
> all this unnevessarily overcomplicated code. It was buggy, is buggy
> and will be buggy. It is inavoidable, as soon as you have hundreds
> of drivers.

de4x5 is becoming EISA-only in 2.5.x too, since its PCI support is
duplicated now in tulip driver.

	Jeff


-- 
Jeff Garzik             | Dinner is ready when
Building 1024           | the smoke alarm goes off.
MandrakeSoft            |	-/usr/games/fortune
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/