* NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
@ 2000-12-28 10:43 David Ford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Ford @ 2000-12-28 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 744 bytes --]
Same old story, bugger still does it. Have to set the link down/up to
get it running again. I had to reset two systems tonight, one up for
~60 days, one up for two days. Both have this card. Unrelated traffic.
This is kernel 2.4.0-test13-pre4
00:12.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev
20)
Subsystem: Unknown device 1385:f004
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap- 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
Latency: 64 set
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
Region 0: I/O ports at f800
Region 1: Memory at fdfffc00 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
-d
[-- Attachment #2: Card for David Ford --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 274 bytes --]
begin:vcard
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.blue-labs.org
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@blue-labs.org
title:Blue Labs Developer
note;quoted-printable:GPG key: http://www.blue-labs.org/david@nifty.key=0D=0A
x-mozilla-cpt:;9952
fn:David Ford
end:vcard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
@ 2000-12-28 11:26 Manfred
2000-12-28 11:36 ` David Ford
2000-12-29 0:30 ` idalton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Manfred @ 2000-12-28 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: david, linux-kernel
David wrote:
>
> Same old story, bugger still does it. Have to set the link down/up to
> get it running again.
>
> 00:12.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev
> 20)
>
I missed your earlier mails, could you resend the details?
I'm interested in the output from
tulip-diag -m -a -f
before and after a link failure.
I'm aware that the tulip drivers doesn't handle cable disconnects and
reconnects with MII pnic cards. I have a patch for that problem, but it
affects _all_ MII tulip cards, and thus it won't be included soon. If
tulip-diag says "10mbps-serial", then you have run into that bug.
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
2000-12-28 11:26 Manfred
@ 2000-12-28 11:36 ` David Ford
2000-12-29 0:30 ` idalton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Ford @ 2000-12-28 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manfred; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1904 bytes --]
Manfred wrote:
> David wrote:
> >
> > Same old story, bugger still does it. Have to set the link down/up to
> > get it running again.
> >
> > 00:12.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev
> > 20)
> >
>
> I missed your earlier mails, could you resend the details?
> I'm interested in the output from
>
> tulip-diag -m -a -f
>
> before and after a link failure.
>
> I'm aware that the tulip drivers doesn't handle cable disconnects and
> reconnects with MII pnic cards. I have a patch for that problem, but it
> affects _all_ MII tulip cards, and thus it won't be included soon. If
> tulip-diag says "10mbps-serial", then you have run into that bug.
>
> --
> Manfred
Here's the before, when the after happens..
# ./tulip-diag -m -a -f
tulip-diag.c:v2.04 9/26/2000 Donald Becker (becker@scyld.com)
http://www.scyld.com/diag/index.html
Index #1: Found a Lite-On 82c168 PNIC adapter at 0xf800.
Lite-On 82c168 PNIC chip registers at 0xf800:
00008000 01ff0000 00450008 0118f000 0118f200 02660010 814c2202 0001ebef
00000000 00000000 0118f2d0 01e3a88c 00000020 00000000 00000000 10000001
00000000 00000000 f0041385 000000bf 609641e1 0118f110 00c99010 0001e978
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
Port selection is MII, full-duplex.
Transmit started, Receive started, full-duplex.
The Rx process state is 'Waiting for packets'.
The Tx process state is 'Idle'.
The transmit threshold is 72.
MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x782d.
MII PHY #1 transceiver registers:
3000 782d 0040 6212 01e1 41e1 0003 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
5000 032b 0002 0046 0000 01cd 0100 0000
003f f53e 0f00 ff00 002f 4000 80a0 000b.
This particular one is on a crossover @ 100 FD with a pcmcia tulip
card...which works fine.
The other machine I had reset tonight was on a crossover w/ cisco 3640
iirc.
-d
[-- Attachment #2: Card for David Ford --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 274 bytes --]
begin:vcard
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.blue-labs.org
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@blue-labs.org
title:Blue Labs Developer
note;quoted-printable:GPG key: http://www.blue-labs.org/david@nifty.key=0D=0A
x-mozilla-cpt:;9952
fn:David Ford
end:vcard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
2000-12-28 11:26 Manfred
2000-12-28 11:36 ` David Ford
@ 2000-12-29 0:30 ` idalton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: idalton @ 2000-12-29 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manfred; +Cc: david, linux-kernel
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 12:26:06PM +0100, Manfred wrote:
> David wrote:
> >
> > Same old story, bugger still does it. Have to set the link down/up to
> > get it running again.
> >
> > 00:12.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev
> > 20)
> >
>
> I missed your earlier mails, could you resend the details?
> I'm interested in the output from
>
> tulip-diag -m -a -f
>
> before and after a link failure.
>
>
> I'm aware that the tulip drivers doesn't handle cable disconnects and
> reconnects with MII pnic cards. I have a patch for that problem, but it
> affects _all_ MII tulip cards, and thus it won't be included soon. If
> tulip-diag says "10mbps-serial", then you have run into that bug.
I have the same transmit timeout problem, but with a D-Link via rhine
board. I'm running -test10, and it seems to happen under high
(interrupt?) load with both heavy disk and network
activity. Interestingly, it appears to happen more often when the other
end of the network activity is a 10BaseT link. I'm using a Netgear
dual-speed hub.
Do you think these might be related?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
@ 2001-01-13 2:24 Darryl Miles
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Darryl Miles @ 2001-01-13 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
I am getting complete lockups of the NIC, up/down the interface doesn't
restore it. rmmod/insmod of ne2k-pci and 8390 doesn't restore it. A
reboot does.
The m/c with this card in isn't normally highly loaded on the network,
but under heavy load it will lockup completely (fairly reliably I
suspect). I have also had this problem with 2.4.0-test11, I had traced
it to ei_tx_intr() in so much as it was calling the
"ei_local->stat.collisions += 16;" line. This is 8390.c:635 in 2.4.0.
The log below shows the time I had reloaded the modules trying to bring
it back to life.
Jan 13 01:46:24 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:46:24 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=951.
Jan 13 01:46:26 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:46:26 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=100.
Jan 13 01:47:14 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:47:14 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=106.
Jan 13 01:47:15 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:47:15 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=26.
Jan 13 01:47:17 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:47:17 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=105.
Jan 13 01:47:24 thehostname kernel: RPC: sendmsg returned error 101
Jan 13 01:47:24 thehostname kernel: nfs: RPC call returned error 101
Jan 13 01:47:24 thehostname kernel: nfs_statfs: statfs error = 101
Jan 13 01:47:37 thehostname kernel: ne2k-pci.c:v1.02 10/19/2000 D.
Becker/P. Gortmaker
Jan 13 01:47:37 thehostname kernel:
http://www.scyld.com/network/ne2k-pci.html
Jan 13 01:47:37 thehostname kernel: eth0: RealTek RTL-8029 found at
0xe800, IRQ 19, 48:54:E8:21:15:56.
Jan 13 01:47:47 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:47:47 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=111.
Jan 13 01:47:58 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:47:58 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=1031.
Jan 13 01:48:00 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:48:00 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x1, ISR=0x3, t=107.
Jan 13 01:48:04 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:48:04 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=106.
Jan 13 01:48:08 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:48:08 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=306.
Jan 13 01:48:10 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:48:10 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x3, t=105.
Jan 13 01:48:24 thehostname kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit
timed out
Jan 13 01:48:24 thehostname kernel: eth0: Tx timed out, lost interrupt?
TSR=0x3, ISR=0x2, t=72.
$ uname -r
2.4.0
lsmod bits:
ne2k-pci 4448 1 (autoclean)
8390 6544 0 (autoclean) [ne2k-pci]
/proc/pci:
Bus 0, device 11, function 0:
Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8029(AS)
(rev 0).
IRQ 19.
I/O at 0xe800 [0xe81f].
--
Darryl Miles
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
@ 2001-03-01 16:59 Caleb Epstein
2001-03-01 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Caleb Epstein @ 2001-03-01 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I am seeing the following error after my machine has been up
for a while. My eth0 is connected to a switched, local
subnet. There is not a lot of traffic on the interface, maybe
a few 100 Mbytes or so. Taking the interface down and then up
again fixes the problem (until it happens again :)
Here is the relevant section from my kernel log
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status e000.
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: diagnostics: net 0ec0 media 4810 dma 00000021.
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: Flags; bus-master 1, full 1; dirty 87959(7) current 87975(7).
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: Transmit list 01252270 vs. c1252270.
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 0: @c1252200 length 800000f7 status 000000f7
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 1: @c1252210 length 8000010c status 0000010c
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 2: @c1252220 length 800000f7 status 000000f7
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 3: @c1252230 length 8000010c status 0000010c
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 4: @c1252240 length 800000f7 status 000000f7
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 5: @c1252250 length 8000002a status 8000002a
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 6: @c1252260 length 8000002a status 8000002a
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 7: @c1252270 length 8000010c status 0000010c
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 8: @c1252280 length 800000f7 status 000000f7
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 9: @c1252290 length 8000010c status 0000010c
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 10: @c12522a0 length 800000f7 status 000000f7
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 11: @c12522b0 length 8000010c status 0000010c
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 12: @c12522c0 length 800000f7 status 000000f7
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 13: @c12522d0 length 8000010c status 0000010c
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 14: @c12522e0 length 800000f7 status 000000f7
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: 15: @c12522f0 length 8000010c status 0000010c
Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: eth0: Resetting the Tx ring pointer.
Then a similar dump repeats until the interface is recycled.
It appears that the interface was not functioning for some
hours before the message was generated, and it was my attempt
to ping a host on the local subnet that caused the NETDEV
WATCHDOG error to be generated (e.g. the card locked up, but
the kernel didn't notice until I tried to send something on
the wire).
The card is:
eth0: 3Com PCI 3c900 Boomerang 10Mbps Combo at 0x1400,
00:60:08:bd:ab:0e, IRQ 9
I am running kernel 2.4.2, and have seen this error in 2.4.1
as well; not sure about 2.4.0. I do not ever recall
encountering this error with the 2.2.x kernels, though my
network topology has changed, but not my hardware. I know of
at least one other person who gets this same error with a
eth0: 3Com PCI 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx card. The system is a
P2-300, 128 Mb RAM, running various versions of Linux very
happily for 3 years.
FWIW, IRQ 9 is shared with the bttv module, though the network
lockup doesn't seem to be related to my use of that module. I
was using xawtv last night while the interface was stil active
and functioning. The lockup happened this morning.
Sorry for the long-winded post. Is this a known bug?
Anything I can do to help track it down and squash it if so?
--
cae at bklyn dot org | Caleb Epstein | bklyn . org | Brooklyn Dust Bunny Mfg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
2001-03-01 16:59 Caleb Epstein
@ 2001-03-01 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2001-03-01 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Caleb Epstein; +Cc: linux-kernel
Caleb Epstein wrote:
>
> I am seeing the following error after my machine has been up
> for a while. My eth0 is connected to a switched, local
> subnet. There is not a lot of traffic on the interface, maybe
> a few 100 Mbytes or so. Taking the interface down and then up
> again fixes the problem (until it happens again :)
>
> Here is the relevant section from my kernel log
>
> Mar 1 10:48:44 tela kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
My guess would be that the driver has decided there's no
link beat on the 10baseT interface and has flopped over
to using 10base2. A fix for this exists in 2.4.2-ac5+,
in the zerocopy patch and in
http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/3c59x.c-2.4.2-pre4.gz
but not in 2.4.2.
You'll need to use
options 3c59x options=0
in /etc/modules.conf to pin the driver down to using a
particular physical interface - disable autoselection.
So could you please upgrade the driver? If problems
remain, please send me a report, as described in the
final section of Documentation/networking/vortex.txt.
Thanks.
-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
[not found] <3F33470A.6070100@imc-berlin.de>
@ 2003-08-10 20:40 ` Thomas Lange
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lange @ 2003-08-10 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Scholz; +Cc: Linuxppc-Embedded
Yes, we received these warnings until we enabled MII on our 860.
Without MII, kernel does not know that network is down and
you get timeout when packet never gets delivered, but not until
all transmit buffers are full (IIRC).
/Thomas
Steven Scholz wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> on my MPC855T based board I get loads of
>
> NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
>
> when unplugging the network while some transfer is going on.
>
> ./Documentation/networking/e1000.txt states
>
> CAUTION:
> When setting RxIntDelay to a value other than 0, adapters may
> hang (stop transmitting) under certain network conditions. If
> this occurs a NETDEV WATCHDOG message is logged in the system
> event log. In addition, the controller is automatically reset,
> restoring the network connection. To eliminate the potential for
> the hang ensure that RxIntDelay is set to 0.
>
> Is it the same with the MPC8xx FEC ???
> Has the value of RxIntDelay something to do with it under MPC8xx ethernet?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steven
>
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
2006-08-01 9:18 gpio Interrupt handling for omap5912 Arnold
@ 2006-08-01 10:25 ` Arnold
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Arnold @ 2006-08-01 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnold, Dirk Behme; +Cc: linux-omap-open-source
--- Arnold <abo_gwapo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been playing around the gpio. writing to pins.
> I
> encountered an error that is weird. Im not sure if
> this is cause by writing to a gpio. I tried several
> gpio pins but I still encountered an error. below is
> the error encountered:
> # ./gpio_test
> Opening gpio driver
> (OJ) Writing at pin = 49
> (OJ) Value of pin = 1
>
> ~ #
> ~ #
> ~ #
> ~ #
> ~ # ./gpio_test
> nfs: server 157.184.66.86 not responding, still
> trying
> NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
> NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
>
> Do Anyone knows whats wrong here? I have no idea why
> Im encountering this error.
>
> Regards,
> OJ
>
>
> --- Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Arnold wrote:
> > > Anybody knows what interrupt number a gpio on
> > omap5912
> > > uses?
> >
> > AFAIK interrupt numbers for GPIO start with 160
> and
> > then are
> > numbered starting with first GPIO bank and so on.
> >
> > See include/asm-arm/arch-omap/irqs.h:
> >
> > #define IH2_BASE 32
> >
> > /* Max. 128 level 2 IRQs (OMAP1610), 192 GPIOs
> > (OMAP730) and
> > * 16 MPUIO lines */
> > #define OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES 192
> > #define IH_GPIO_BASE (128 + IH2_BASE)
> > #define IH_MPUIO_BASE
> (OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES
> > +
> > IH_GPIO_BASE)
> > #define IH_BOARD_BASE (16 +
> IH_MPUIO_BASE)
> >
> > Have a look to GPIO framework in gpio.c and its
> > usage in
> > various files which can help you programming GPIO
> > stuff.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Dirk
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-omap-open-source mailing list
> Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com
>
http://linux.omap.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-omap-open-source
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
@ 2007-12-14 13:48 José Luís
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: José Luís @ 2007-12-14 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-omap-open-source
Hi,
I have some problems with the arm omap 1610 board. I'm trying to use
rt-preemption patch,
but when kernel boot, it mount nfs filesystem and after network down, see
console messages:
IP-Config: Got DHCP answer from 10.0.0.1, my address is 10.0.0.9
IP-Config: Complete:
device=eth0, addr=10.0.0.9, mask=255.255.255.0, gw= 255.255.255.255,
host=10.0.0.9, domain=atena, nis-domain=(none),
bootserver=10.0.0.1, rootserver=10.0.0.1, rootpath=
Looking up port of RPC 100003/2 on 10.0.0.1
Looking up port of RPC 100005/1 on 10.0.0.1
VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem).
Freeing init memory: 132K
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
nfs: server 10.0.0.1 not responding, still trying
nfs: server 10.0.0.1 not responding, still trying
nfs: server 10.0.0.1 not responding, still trying
nfs: server 10.0.0.1 not responding, still trying
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
nfs: server 10.0.0.1 not responding, still trying
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
I'm using kernel image linux-2.6.23.9 from kernel.org, the
2.6.23-omap1patch from
muru.com and 2.6.23.9-rt12 patch from Ingo Molnar.
Without rt-preempt patch applied, the system works fine.
Anyone know how to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance.
José Luís
--
José Luís do Nascimento
Mestrando em Engenharia Elétrica
Laboratório de Sistemas Embarcados e Computação Pervasiva
UFCG - Campina Grande
jluisn at {ee,dee,embedded}.ufcg.edu.br
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-14 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-28 10:43 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out David Ford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-28 11:26 Manfred
2000-12-28 11:36 ` David Ford
2000-12-29 0:30 ` idalton
2001-01-13 2:24 Darryl Miles
2001-03-01 16:59 Caleb Epstein
2001-03-01 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] <3F33470A.6070100@imc-berlin.de>
2003-08-10 20:40 ` Thomas Lange
2006-08-01 9:18 gpio Interrupt handling for omap5912 Arnold
2006-08-01 10:25 ` NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Arnold
2007-12-14 13:48 José Luís
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.