Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>]

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > This is true, but one thing I'd really like to have is controlled buffer
> > overrun, which TCP *doesn't* have.  I really think an ad hoc UDP protocol
> > (I've already begun sketching on the details) is more appropriate in this
> > particular case.
> 
> Explain 'controlled buffer overrun'. BTW if you make it UDP please include
> something like SHA hash or tea hash and shared secret
> 

I *REALLY* don't know if that is reasonable; it may have to fall into the
category of "supported but not required".  Requiring an SHA hash in a
small bootstrap loader may not exactly be a reasonable expectation! 
However, I think the protocol is inherently going to be asymmetric, with
as much as possible unloaded.

	-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/