* New unaligned-accessed arch flag?
@ 2001-03-15 3:00 Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2001-03-15 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Instead of putting arch-specific ifdefs in drivers, would it be
reasonable to add a per-arch flag UNALIGNED_PROFITABLE? Arch-specific
ifdefs all over the default rx_copybreak values in net drivers are the
example I have in mind, but it seems like it would be good knowledge
that can be easily exposed to the rest of the kernel.
--
Jeff Garzik | May you have warm words on a cold evening,
Building 1024 | a full mooon on a dark night,
MandrakeSoft | and a smooth road all the way to your door.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-03-15 3:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-03-15 3:00 New unaligned-accessed arch flag? Jeff Garzik
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.