* Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS seems to be stable as of 2.4.4
[not found] ` <20010504192348.A11507@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
@ 2001-05-07 0:19 ` Hans Reiser
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2001-05-07 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dirk Mueller; +Cc: Chris Mason, reiserfs-list, linux-kernel
Dirk Mueller wrote:
>
> Now consider a good amount of fragmentation because those files get created
> over time (weeks, months etc). and you quickly degenerade to a scanning
> speed of maybe 10-20 files per second (Athlon 800, IBM 60GB HD with roughly
> 35MB/s linear read). It was that horrible that I quickly returned to mbox
> for those lists with high amount of traffic.
I think only a repacker can properly cure performance problems of slowly
accumulating files and directories . September 2002.
We can do other things that will gain 5 percent here and there, but the repacker
will be the real cure.
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-05-06 22:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20010504182357.A20214@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
[not found] ` <341650000.988994279@tiny>
[not found] ` <20010504192348.A11507@rotes20.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
2001-05-07 0:19 ` [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS seems to be stable as of 2.4.4 Hans Reiser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.