glibc

glibc

[Steven Liu]

Hi, ALL:

I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to build glibc
but I could not find the following files:

	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
            glibc-crypt-2.0.6.tar.gz
            glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz
 	glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6.tar.gz
	glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch

If anyone know the place I caould get the files and let me know, I would
be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

Steven Liu

glibc

[Steven Liu]

Hi, ALL:

I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to build glibc
but I could not find the following files:

	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
            glibc-crypt-2.0.6.tar.gz
            glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz
 	glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6.tar.gz
	glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch

If anyone know the place I caould get the files and let me know, I would
be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

Steven Liu

Re: glibc

[Pete Popov]

Steven Liu wrote:
> Hi, ALL:
> 
> I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to build glibc
> but I could not find the following files:
> 
> 	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
>             glibc-crypt-2.0.6.tar.gz
>             glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz
>  	glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6.tar.gz
> 	glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch
> 
> If anyone know the place I caould get the files and let me know, I would
> be greatly appreciated.

Why are you porting 2.2.12? 2.4 is much more easy to port and there's already 
pretty good support for a number of different boards. The tools and glibc 
(2.2.3) are ready and available from a few places. And, you are much more likely 
to get help from someone with the 2.4 kernel, since that's what everyone seems 
to be using. As soon as your 2.2.12 port is done, it will be dead. Who are you 
going to submit it to? Just my 2c anyway.


Pete

glibc

[Diyab]

Is there any specific way to check for AT_SECURE functionality in glibc?

Timothy,

-- 
I put instant coffee in a microwave and almost went back in time.
		-- Steven Wright


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

Re: glibc

[Siders, Keith]

http://www.mips.com/devTools/devArea/Linux.html states "The MIPS Linux
kernel is available based on both 2.2.12 and 2.4 releases, and is provided
as a reference for developers using Linux in a system based on a MIPS
Technologies core. It supports MIPS32 and MIPS64 CPUs..." Why are people
grabbing 2.2.12? Don't know, but 2.4 is available at
ftp://ftp.mips.com/pub/linux/mips/kernel/2.4/. Additional info is available
up a couple levels at ftp://ftp.mips.com/pub/linux/mips/. Enjoy...



-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Ilya Volynets [mailto:ilya@theIlya.com]
-> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:42 PM
-> To: Siders, Keith
-> Subject: Re: glibc
-> 
-> 
-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-> Hash: SHA1
-> 
-> Why are people trying to port 2.2.12 all the time, then?
-> 
-> On Wednesday 15 August 2001 14:37, you wrote:
-> > 2.4.3 is available there...
-> >
-> > -> -----Original Message-----
-> > -> From: Ilya Volynets [mailto:ilya@theIlya.com]
-> > -> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:38 PM
-> > -> To: Siders, Keith; 'Steven Liu'; linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
-> > -> Subject: Re: glibc
-> > ->
-> > ->
-> > -> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-> > -> Hash: SHA1
-> > ->
-> > -> Do NOT go there. Do NOT look for development tools.
-> > -> Port 2.4.x
-> > -> I wonder when MIPS will remove that 2.2.12 kit from 
-> their site.....
-> > ->
-> > -> On Wednesday 15 August 2001 14:31, Siders, Keith wrote:
-> > -> > Go to http://www.mips.com/ and look for the developer tools.
-> > -> >
-> > -> > -> -----Original Message-----
-> > -> > -> From: Steven Liu [mailto:stevenliu@psdc.com]
-> > -> > -> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:46 PM
-> > -> > -> To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
-> > -> > -> Subject: glibc
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > -> Hi, ALL:
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > -> I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to
-> > -> > -> build glibc
-> > -> > -> but I could not find the following files:
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > -> 	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > -> > ->             glibc-crypt-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > -> > ->             glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > -> > ->  	glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > -> > -> 	glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > -> If anyone know the place I caould get the files and let me
-> > -> > -> know, I would
-> > -> > -> be greatly appreciated.
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > -> Thank you.
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> > -> Steven Liu
-> > -> > ->
-> > -> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-> > -> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
-> > -> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-> > ->
-> > -> iEYEARECAAYFAjt668EACgkQtKh84cA8u2kCxwCff1UwiYf1UZO11dmtgOEPBB9t
-> > -> 7l8AoKQ5XVajZ8Dy/Sc5Hw3exowaMLcg
-> > -> =IQWT
-> > -> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-> > ->
-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
-> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-> 
-> iEUEARECAAYFAjt67MwACgkQtKh84cA8u2nm6wCbBwx8sTgrDVM0OAhc5nJ2yQj8
-> Jp4AlRa1sIz35E2ulVdZ0HqiOjCjCVs=
-> =qs+y
-> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-> 

RE: glibc

[Siders, Keith]

2.4.3 is available there...

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Ilya Volynets [mailto:ilya@theIlya.com]
-> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:38 PM
-> To: Siders, Keith; 'Steven Liu'; linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
-> Subject: Re: glibc
-> 
-> 
-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-> Hash: SHA1
-> 
-> Do NOT go there. Do NOT look for development tools.
-> Port 2.4.x
-> I wonder when MIPS will remove that 2.2.12 kit from their site.....
-> 
-> On Wednesday 15 August 2001 14:31, Siders, Keith wrote:
-> > Go to http://www.mips.com/ and look for the developer tools.
-> >
-> > -> -----Original Message-----
-> > -> From: Steven Liu [mailto:stevenliu@psdc.com]
-> > -> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:46 PM
-> > -> To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
-> > -> Subject: glibc
-> > ->
-> > ->
-> > -> Hi, ALL:
-> > ->
-> > -> I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to
-> > -> build glibc
-> > -> but I could not find the following files:
-> > ->
-> > -> 	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > ->             glibc-crypt-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > ->             glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > ->  	glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> > -> 	glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch
-> > ->
-> > -> If anyone know the place I caould get the files and let me
-> > -> know, I would
-> > -> be greatly appreciated.
-> > ->
-> > -> Thank you.
-> > ->
-> > -> Steven Liu
-> > ->
-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-> Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
-> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-> 
-> iEYEARECAAYFAjt668EACgkQtKh84cA8u2kCxwCff1UwiYf1UZO11dmtgOEPBB9t
-> 7l8AoKQ5XVajZ8Dy/Sc5Hw3exowaMLcg
-> =IQWT
-> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-> 

RE: glibc

[Siders, Keith]

Go to http://www.mips.com/ and look for the developer tools. 

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Steven Liu [mailto:stevenliu@psdc.com]
-> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:46 PM
-> To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
-> Subject: glibc
-> 
-> 
-> Hi, ALL:
-> 
-> I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to 
-> build glibc
-> but I could not find the following files:
-> 
-> 	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
->             glibc-crypt-2.0.6.tar.gz
->             glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz
->  	glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6.tar.gz
-> 	glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch
-> 
-> If anyone know the place I caould get the files and let me 
-> know, I would
-> be greatly appreciated.
-> 
-> Thank you.
-> 
-> Steven Liu
-> 

Re: glibc

[Ilya Volynets]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Do NOT go there. Do NOT look for development tools.
Port 2.4.x
I wonder when MIPS will remove that 2.2.12 kit from their site.....

On Wednesday 15 August 2001 14:31, Siders, Keith wrote:
> Go to http://www.mips.com/ and look for the developer tools.
>
> -> -----Original Message-----
> -> From: Steven Liu [mailto:stevenliu@psdc.com]
> -> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:46 PM
> -> To: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
> -> Subject: glibc
> ->
> ->
> -> Hi, ALL:
> ->
> -> I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to
> -> build glibc
> -> but I could not find the following files:
> ->
> -> 	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
> ->             glibc-crypt-2.0.6.tar.gz
> ->             glibc-localedata-2.0.6.tar.gz
> ->  	glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6.tar.gz
> -> 	glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch
> ->
> -> If anyone know the place I caould get the files and let me
> -> know, I would
> -> be greatly appreciated.
> ->
> -> Thank you.
> ->
> -> Steven Liu
> ->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjt668EACgkQtKh84cA8u2kCxwCff1UwiYf1UZO11dmtgOEPBB9t
7l8AoKQ5XVajZ8Dy/Sc5Hw3exowaMLcg
=IQWT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: glibc

[Alan Cox]

> I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to build glibc
> but I could not find the following files:

Oh no not again.

2.2.12 is historical value only. It has remote vulnerabilities and shouldnt
be used for anything.

> 	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz

glibc 2.0 is also obsolete, heavily so

Re: glibc

[Alan Cox]

> I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to build glibc
> but I could not find the following files:

Oh no not again.

2.2.12 is historical value only. It has remote vulnerabilities and shouldnt
be used for anything.

> 	glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz

glibc 2.0 is also obsolete, heavily so

Re: glibc

[Brian Murphy]

Alan Cox wrote:

> > I am porting Linux version 2.2.12 to Mips R3000 and need to build glibc
> > but I could not find the following files:
>
> Oh no not again.
>
> 2.2.12 is historical value only. It has remote vulnerabilities and shouldnt
> be used for anything.
>
> >       glibc-2.0.6.tar.gz
>
> glibc 2.0 is also obsolete, heavily so

We use 2.0.6 here because it is half the size of the newer glibcs and it seems

to work fine for us.

/Brian

Re: glibc

[Alan Cox]

> We use 2.0.6 here because it is half the size of the newer glibcs and it seems
> to work fine for us.

It trust someone patched the holes in it for things like DNS lookups ?

Re: glibc

[Alan Cox]

> We use 2.0.6 here because it is half the size of the newer glibcs and it seems
> to work fine for us.

It trust someone patched the holes in it for things like DNS lookups ?

Re: glibc

[Ralf Baechle]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 03:04:23PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> > We use 2.0.6 here because it is half the size of the newer glibcs and it
> > seems to work fine for us.
> 
> It trust someone patched the holes in it for things like DNS lookups ?

The latest glibc 2.0.6 I was spreading only has MIPS-specific bug fixes.
All the other big holes which are indeed big enough to drive a nice shipload
of trucks through are unfixed.  I haven't noticed that any other glibc
2.0 variant floating around has additional fixes.

Nice for Cobalt boxen ...

  Ralf

Re: glibc

[Martin Michlmayr]

* Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> [20010816 18:14]:
> The latest glibc 2.0.6 I was spreading only has MIPS-specific bug
> fixes.  All the other big holes which are indeed big enough to drive
> a nice shipload of trucks through are unfixed.  I haven't noticed
> that any other glibc 2.0 variant floating around has additional
> fixes.
> 
> Nice for Cobalt boxen ...

Debian is being ported to Cobalts.  A base tar ball can be found at
http://www.pocketlinux.com/~samc/debian-cobalt

Re: glibc

[James Simmons]

> > The latest glibc 2.0.6 I was spreading only has MIPS-specific bug
> > fixes.  All the other big holes which are indeed big enough to drive
> > a nice shipload of trucks through are unfixed.  I haven't noticed
> > that any other glibc 2.0 variant floating around has additional
> > fixes.
> > 
> > Nice for Cobalt boxen ...
> 
> Debian is being ported to Cobalts.  A base tar ball can be found at
> http://www.pocketlinux.com/~samc/debian-cobalt

All the latest stuff there. I use it for my native build system. The
kernel is a 2.4.5 BTW if people are curious. I attempt a 2.4.6 kernel but
for some reason the cube doesn't like it. I believe I have a bug in the
old time code which is affected by the soft_pending change. I will attempt
to track it down some time next week.

Re: glibc

[Soeren Laursen]

> * Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com> [20010816 18:14]:
> > The latest glibc 2.0.6 I was spreading only has MIPS-specific bug
> > fixes.  All the other big holes which are indeed big enough to drive
> > a nice shipload of trucks through are unfixed.  I haven't noticed
> > that any other glibc 2.0 variant floating around has additional
> > fixes.
> > 
> > Nice for Cobalt boxen ...
> 
> Debian is being ported to Cobalts.  A base tar ball can be found at
> http://www.pocketlinux.com/~samc/debian-cobalt

Has anybody any luck running it on raq2 from Cobalt/SUN?

Soeren,

Re: glibc

[H . J . Lu]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:50:25AM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote:
> 
> We use 2.0.6 here because it is half the size of the newer glibcs and it seems
> 
> to work fine for us.
> 

I am working on sglibc. It has a smaller size by disabling selective
features.


H.J.

Re: glibc

[Brian Murphy]

"H . J . Lu" wrote:

>
> I am working on sglibc. It has a smaller size by disabling selective
> features.
>
> H.J.

Sounds excellent. How do I get my hands on it?

/Brian

Re: glibc

[H . J . Lu]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:00:42PM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" wrote:
> 
> >
> > I am working on sglibc. It has a smaller size by disabling selective
> > features.
> >
> > H.J.
> 
> Sounds excellent. How do I get my hands on it?
> 

http://sourceforge.net/projects/sglibc/

It is for developers only.


H.J.

Re: glibc

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Matt Taggart wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> 
> First a timezone question... your mail headers have you in +11 and Ft. Collins 
> is -7 so you're 6 hours behind + 1 day relative to us? So as I send this it's 
> 14:05 here and 8:05 there?

Hi Matt,
  I'm actually on +10:30 in Adelaide, but posting from a Linuxcare machine
in Canberra which is on +11.

>[snip segfaults]
> I am building native using dhd's binutils/gcc/glibc debs, using source checked 
> out just after the glibc 2.2 merge. Do you think the merge / ld.so changes you 
> just made would help this problem at all?

Quite likely.  This fix

	* sysdeps/hppa/dl-machine.h (ELF_MACHINE_START_ADDRESS): Define.

is fairly crucial, as without it %dp will not be set correctly.  I should
have mentioned this when posting to the list about the binutils change.
Oh, and as of this email, I haven't actually run anything linked to the
new glibc.  A little remiss, I know, but I've been deep in the gdb port,
and if I spend time tinkering with glibc, binutils and gcc (which I like),
gdb (which I don't like) will never be finished. ;-)

Alan
-- 
Linuxcare.  Support for the Revolution.

Re: Incorrect optimization on PowerPC due to volatile keyword (gcc-2.95.1 official)

[Franz Sirl]

Hi,

this seems fixed in the current gcc-2.95.2pre sources. You can download the 
Rev. 0g RPM's from <ftp://devel.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/R5/RPMS/ppc/>, 
that should fix it.

Franz.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: glibc

[Franz Sirl]

At 20:13 20.10.99 , Sean Chitwood wrote:
>Hi-
>         I have just built the glibc-2.1.3-0a, before I replace 
> glibc-2.1.1-6c,  does anyone know if any problems will occur? Also how 
> can I compile against the libraries w/o installing them?

If the RPM built fine and a "make check" in build directory passed, the new 
library is OK.

Franz.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

glibc

[Sean Chitwood]

Hi-
	I have just built the glibc-2.1.3-0a, before I replace glibc-2.1.1-6c,  does anyone know if any problems will occur? Also how can I compile against the libraries w/o installing them?

	Sean aka Darkmane
+------------------------------
+ On October 16, 1999 A.D.
+ Sean Chitwood proudly proclaimed
+ his love for Melissa Webb
+ and made her his lifemate
+------------------------------


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: glibc....

[Franz Sirl]

At 22:47 11.10.99 , Sean Chitwood wrote:

>Hi-
>         I'm working to try and get mozilla compiling on LinuxPPC again. 
> Has anyone had any success getting glibc-2.1.2 to compile? There seems to 
> be a bug in the current version of glibc(2.1.1-6c) and I was wondering if 
> anyone had updated glibc?

<ftp://devel.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/>

Franz.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

glibc....

[Sean Chitwood]

Hi-
	I'm working to try and get mozilla compiling on LinuxPPC again. Has anyone had any success getting glibc-2.1.2 to compile? There seems to be a bug in the current version of glibc(2.1.1-6c) and I was wondering if anyone had updated glibc?

	Sean aka Darkmane
+------------------------------
+ Eagerly awaiting 10/16/99
+ The date he weds Melissa Webb
+ His only wife.
+------------------------------


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/