* More dependencies on CONFIG_SMP
@ 2001-11-08 13:19 BALBIR SINGH
2001-11-08 14:11 ` Keith Owens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: BALBIR SINGH @ 2001-11-08 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 786 bytes --]
Looking at arch/i386/config.in
if [ "$CONFIG_SMP" = "y" -a "$CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG" = "y" ]; then
define_bool CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK y
fi
endmenu
and arch/i386/lib/Makefile
.obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK) += dec_and_lock.o
We need to have SMP set inorder to use dec_and_lock. The file fs/dcache.c
in function dput uses a function atomic_dec_and_lock function, which is
defined in dec_and_lock.c. I think the SMP dependency should go
If this patch is ok, please apply
--- config.in.org Thu Nov 8 18:43:49 2001
+++ config.in Thu Nov 8 18:44:04 2001
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
bool 'Multiquad NUMA system' CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
fi
-if [ "$CONFIG_SMP" = "y" -a "$CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG" = "y" ]; then
+if [ "$CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG" = "y" ]; then
define_bool CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK y
fi
[-- Attachment #2: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 855 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro and/or its Customers and
is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without
proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this
information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please
notify us immediately at mailto:mailadmin@wipro.com and delete this mail
from your records.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: More dependencies on CONFIG_SMP
2001-11-08 13:19 More dependencies on CONFIG_SMP BALBIR SINGH
@ 2001-11-08 14:11 ` Keith Owens
2001-11-08 14:13 ` BALBIR SINGH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Keith Owens @ 2001-11-08 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: BALBIR SINGH; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 18:49:27 +0530,
"BALBIR SINGH" <balbir.singh@wipro.com> wrote:
>Looking at arch/i386/config.in
>
>if [ "$CONFIG_SMP" = "y" -a "$CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG" = "y" ]; then
> define_bool CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK y
>fi
>endmenu
>
>and arch/i386/lib/Makefile
>
>.obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK) += dec_and_lock.o
>
>We need to have SMP set inorder to use dec_and_lock. The file fs/dcache.c
>in function dput uses a function atomic_dec_and_lock function, which is
>defined in dec_and_lock.c.
There is a #define for atomic_dec_and_lock when compiling for UP. I
suspect that you have been bitten by the broken makefiles, otherwise
everybody would be reporting problems with 2.4.14. Before you send any
more patches (and before your existing patches are used), please follow
the steps in http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-8.
If you still get problems after that, mail the error messages and your
.config instead of sending patches to "fix" bugs which nobody else is
seeing. You should include the errors you are getting, otherwise we
cannot tell if the patch makes sense or not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: More dependencies on CONFIG_SMP
2001-11-08 14:11 ` Keith Owens
@ 2001-11-08 14:13 ` BALBIR SINGH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: BALBIR SINGH @ 2001-11-08 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Owens, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 735 bytes --]
>
>
>
>There is a #define for atomic_dec_and_lock when compiling for UP. I
>suspect that you have been bitten by the broken makefiles, otherwise
>everybody would be reporting problems with 2.4.14. Before you send any
>more patches (and before your existing patches are used), please follow
>the steps in http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-8.
>
>If you still get problems after that, mail the error messages and your
>.config instead of sending patches to "fix" bugs which nobody else is
>seeing. You should include the errors you are getting, otherwise we
>cannot tell if the patch makes sense or not.
>
Agreed and understood, that was my fault. I saw that dec_and_lock.c did not
compiled. So, I began to think that was the case.
Balbir
[-- Attachment #2: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 855 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro and/or its Customers and
is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without
proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this
information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please
notify us immediately at mailto:mailadmin@wipro.com and delete this mail
from your records.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-08 14:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-08 13:19 More dependencies on CONFIG_SMP BALBIR SINGH
2001-11-08 14:11 ` Keith Owens
2001-11-08 14:13 ` BALBIR SINGH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.