From: "François Cami" <stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr>
To: James A Sutherland <jas88@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, war <war@starband.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Swap vs No Swap.
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:17:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BFD4F57.8030408@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0111221456020.1491-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <3BFD4A42.8090002@wanadoo.fr> <E166z3N-00020W-00@mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk>
James A Sutherland wrote:
>>Obviously the problem is very much lessened, in my case, when
>>i put the swap partition on the *other* drive than the root fs.
>>Both are ATA100 (40GB 60GXPs), and the system is more responsive
>>with swap on hdc while / in on hda, than both on hda.
>>
>
> Hmm... if you've experimented with this, how does this setup compare to a
> striped RAID of hda+hdc used for root and swap? (i.e. is the speedup down to
> splitting accesses between two spindles?)
I haven't, but it's a good idea, I may give it a try, but not very soon.
François
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-22 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-22 1:53 Swap vs No Swap war
2001-11-22 2:23 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-11-22 2:31 ` war
2001-11-22 2:58 ` Mark Hahn
2001-11-22 4:09 ` listmail
2001-11-22 5:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-22 5:30 ` war
2001-11-22 5:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-22 9:50 ` Christian Bornträger
2001-11-22 8:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-22 11:00 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:00 ` war
2001-11-22 16:08 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-22 18:56 ` François Cami
2001-11-22 18:58 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 19:17 ` François Cami [this message]
2001-11-22 19:36 ` G . Sumner Hayes
2001-11-22 20:37 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 6:30 ` Charles Marslett
2001-11-23 9:13 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 16:46 ` Charles Marslett
2001-11-22 16:25 ` war
2001-11-22 16:37 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-11-22 17:39 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 17:56 ` war
[not found] ` <01112211150302.00690@argo>
2001-11-22 16:01 ` war
2001-11-22 16:12 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:36 ` war
2001-11-22 16:33 ` Bjorn Wesen
2001-11-22 17:37 ` Thomas S. Iversen
2001-11-22 21:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-11-22 17:41 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 17:56 ` war
2001-11-22 18:08 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 22:05 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-22 16:11 Elgar, Jeremy
2001-11-22 16:22 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-11-22 16:22 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-22 16:29 Elgar, Jeremy
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111221006010.29736-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-11-22 16:34 ` war
2001-11-26 20:18 ` Kent Borg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BFD4F57.8030408@wanadoo.fr \
--to=stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=jas88@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=war@starband.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.