[ANNOUNCEMENT] Linux 2.0.40-pre3

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Linux 2.0.40-pre3

[David Weinehall]

Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40


2.0.40pre3

o	Fix typo in sched.c			(Tim Sutherland)
	| this time for real; I applied this
	| patch to the wrong kernel-tree last
	| time, hence the reject
o	IDE probe patch for some ATAPI drives	(Geert Van der Plas)


2.0.40pre2

o	Make pci2000 compile			(Joseph Martin)
o	Use KERNELRELEASE in module		(me)
	installpath as well
o	Removed unused variable in		(me)
	ext2/super.c
o	Fixed warning in ext2/dir.c		(me)
o	Fix a blunder of my own in		(me)
	arch/kernel/i386/traps.c
o	Fix typo in sched.c			(Tim Sutherland)
o	Fix bug in mkdep.c			(Tim Sutherland)
o	Fix bug in autoirq.c			(Michael Deutschmann)
o	Add allocation debugging code		(Michael Deutschmann)
o	Fix bugs in the math-emu code		(Bill Metzenthen,
						 Michael Deutschmann)


2.0.40pre1

o	Fixed the ordering of			(Philipp Rumpf)
	watchdog initialising, to make sure
	hardware watchdogs takes precedence
	over the softdog driver
o	Fix the CREDITS-entry for		(Kai Petzke)
	Kai Petzke
o	Updated the MAINTAINERS-file a little	(me)
o	Fix "dumpable"-race			(Solar Designer)
o	Fix theoretical exploit in printk	(Solar Designer)
o	Backported checkconfig.pl,		(me)
	checkhelp.pl and checkincludes.pl
	from v2.4
o	Backported support for tags and		(me)
	TAGS
o	Added an extra-version entry to		(me)
	the version#, to keep track of
	the prepatches etc.
o	Fix all occurences of			(me)
	#endif BLABLA type; don't forget
	that it should be /* BLABLA */ !!!


/David
  _                                                                 _
 // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander      \\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\>  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    </   Full colour fire           </

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Linux 2.0.40-pre3

[Stefan Smietanowski]

Hi David.

> Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
> patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
> 
> 
> 2.0.40pre3

Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?

Mail subject and mail contents is different.

// Stefan

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Linux 2.0.40-pre3

[David Weinehall]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:30:12PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Hi David.
> 
> > Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
> > patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
> > 
> > 
> > 2.0.40pre3
> 
> Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?
> 
> Mail subject and mail contents is different.

I mean that I use it in the Makefile EXTRAVERSION


Regards: David
  _                                                                 _
 // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander      \\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\>  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    </   Full colour fire           </

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Linux 2.0.40-pre3

[David Weinehall]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:36:35PM +0100, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> >>>Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
> >>>patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>2.0.40pre3
> >>>
> >>Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?
> >>
> >>Mail subject and mail contents is different.
> >>
> > 
> > I mean that I use it in the Makefile EXTRAVERSION
> 
> Why not use it everywhere ? Or do you consider there to be a valid 
> difference?

No, more of a thinko :-)


/David
  _                                                                 _
 // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander      \\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\>  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    </   Full colour fire           </

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Linux 2.0.40-pre3

[Stefan Smietanowski]

Hi.

>>>Here comes another one. Unless I receive some more patches, the next
>>>patch will be the first release-candidate for v2.0.40
>>>
>>>
>>>2.0.40pre3
>>>
>>Didn't you just say that you do -preN _with_ a leading "-" ?
>>
>>Mail subject and mail contents is different.
>>
> 
> I mean that I use it in the Makefile EXTRAVERSION

Why not use it everywhere ? Or do you consider there to be a valid 
difference?

// Stefan