All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: nigel@nrg.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve spinlock debugging
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 13:27:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C0D3FD8.59346BBF@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0112041314010.595-100000@cosmic.nrg.org>

Nigel Gamble wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, george anzinger wrote:
> >                               For example, preemption currently counts
> > up on spin_lock and disable irq, counting the spin_lockirq twice.  In
> 
> That's not correct: we don't count it twice because we don't count
> local_irq_disable etc., only the spin locks.  Because...
> 
> >                                               (Oh, and since the irq
> > inhibits preemption all by itself, we don't need to count it either.)
> 
> ...so we don't.

Right, but we do count spin_lockirq (just once).  See other email, this
time.

-- 
George           george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-04 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-03 20:10 [PATCH] improve spinlock debugging Manfred Spraul
2001-12-04  4:21 ` David S. Miller
2001-12-04  4:30   ` Robert Love
2001-12-04 20:30 ` george anzinger
2001-12-04 20:51   ` Robert Love
2001-12-04 21:25     ` george anzinger
2001-12-04 21:39       ` Robert Love
2001-12-04 22:06     ` Nigel Gamble
2001-12-04 22:23       ` Robert Love
2001-12-05  1:13         ` Roman Zippel
2001-12-05  7:41           ` george anzinger
2001-12-04 20:53   ` Manfred Spraul
2001-12-05  0:54     ` george anzinger
2001-12-04 21:20   ` Nigel Gamble
2001-12-04 21:27     ` george anzinger [this message]
2001-12-05  8:47 ` Giuliano Pochini
2001-12-05 15:42   ` Manfred Spraul
     [not found] ` <20011219025332.GA18344@krispykreme>
2001-12-20 17:08   ` Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C0D3FD8.59346BBF@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nrg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.