All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* GT64260 ethernet
@ 2002-02-01 20:47 Val Henson
  2002-02-01 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
  2002-02-01 23:35 ` Mark A. Greer
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Val Henson @ 2002-02-01 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev


We have a board with the Galileo GT64260 chip and we'd like to use the
gt64260 ethernet driver.  At the moment, its config option is in
arch/ppc/config.in and is controlled by the CONFIG_GT64260 option
(which is not turned on for our boards, CONFIG_GEMINI is).  I'd think
that the preferred way to fix this is to put the CONFIG_GT64260_ETH
option in drivers/net/config.in.  The alternative is to have

if [ "$CONFIG_GT64260" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_GEMINI" = "y" ]; then

-VAL

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: GT64260 ethernet
  2002-02-01 20:47 GT64260 ethernet Val Henson
@ 2002-02-01 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
  2002-02-01 23:38   ` Mark A. Greer
  2002-02-01 23:35 ` Mark A. Greer
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2002-02-01 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Val Henson; +Cc: linuxppc-dev


On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:47:23PM -0700, Val Henson wrote:
> We have a board with the Galileo GT64260 chip and we'd like to use the
> gt64260 ethernet driver.  At the moment, its config option is in
> arch/ppc/config.in and is controlled by the CONFIG_GT64260 option
> (which is not turned on for our boards, CONFIG_GEMINI is).  I'd think
> that the preferred way to fix this is to put the CONFIG_GT64260_ETH
> option in drivers/net/config.in.  The alternative is to have

I at least prefer to have as many drivers as possible, including
arch-specific ones, in drivers/net and listed in drivers/net/Config.in.
It makes life a lot easier when evaluating all drivers for a common bug,
or common cleanup.

	Jeff


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: GT64260 ethernet
  2002-02-01 20:47 GT64260 ethernet Val Henson
  2002-02-01 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-02-01 23:35 ` Mark A. Greer
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark A. Greer @ 2002-02-01 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Val Henson; +Cc: linuxppc-dev


Val Henson wrote:

> We have a board with the Galileo GT64260 chip and we'd like to use the
> gt64260 ethernet driver.  At the moment, its config option is in
> arch/ppc/config.in and is controlled by the CONFIG_GT64260 option
> (which is not turned on for our boards, CONFIG_GEMINI is).  I'd think
> that the preferred way to fix this is to put the CONFIG_GT64260_ETH
> option in drivers/net/config.in.  The alternative is to have
>
> if [ "$CONFIG_GT64260" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_GEMINI" = "y" ]; then

This may not be the best place for it but right now, that stuff is in
arch/ppc/config.in.  When you turn on CONFIG_GT64260 (presumably as a
result of selecting your platform--see CONFIG_EV64260), there will be an
additional submenu show up under "Platform support" called "Galileo
GT64260 Options".  Go in there and select the enet drivers you want and
pick a MAC addr if you don't like the default.

I guess that should migrate to the drivers/net Config.in...

The driver worked once but has been broken by the latest checkin (at
least for me).  I have a version that works for me.  I will push it out
sometime next week but if you need it now, let me know and I'll email it
to you.

Mark


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: GT64260 ethernet
  2002-02-01 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-02-01 23:38   ` Mark A. Greer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark A. Greer @ 2002-02-01 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Val Henson, linuxppc-dev


Jeff Garzik wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:47:23PM -0700, Val Henson wrote:
> > We have a board with the Galileo GT64260 chip and we'd like to use the
> > gt64260 ethernet driver.  At the moment, its config option is in
> > arch/ppc/config.in and is controlled by the CONFIG_GT64260 option
> > (which is not turned on for our boards, CONFIG_GEMINI is).  I'd think
> > that the preferred way to fix this is to put the CONFIG_GT64260_ETH
> > option in drivers/net/config.in.  The alternative is to have
>
> I at least prefer to have as many drivers as possible, including
> arch-specific ones, in drivers/net and listed in drivers/net/Config.in.
> It makes life a lot easier when evaluating all drivers for a common bug,
> or common cleanup.

Yes, that make sense.  I'll get that moved over.

Mark


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-01 23:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-01 20:47 GT64260 ethernet Val Henson
2002-02-01 20:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-01 23:38   ` Mark A. Greer
2002-02-01 23:35 ` Mark A. Greer

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.