From: "Andrew Scott" <A.J.Scott@casdn.neu.edu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: windows is more secure than linux!!
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:01:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C67B28E.5199.18B551@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B0C77D98347F826499A03C1FE22DE33B@william.fitzgerald2.beer.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0202051621590.12225-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
On 5 Feb 2002 at 16:41, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, william fitzgerald wrote:
>
> > some of you might find this interesting others
> > disheartening
>
> Still others, like me, find it very encouraging
> that Microsoft can't stop talking about Linux.
> They must be enthusiastic about it, or something.
>
> > www.shortnews.com/shownews.cfm?id=16886&u_id=623
>
> Now add the security holes in ISS, Outlook, Exchange,
> Access and all available pieces of Windows software
> into the picture so Linux and Windows are measured on
> an equal ground.
>
> Lies, damn lies & statistics.
Or as my dad used to say, "Figures don't lie, but liers can figure".
_
/ \ / ascott@casdn.neu.edu
/ \ \ /
/ \_/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-11 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-05 11:47 windows is more secure than linux!! william fitzgerald
2002-02-05 13:03 ` Bugtraq Mailing Lists
2002-02-05 13:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-05 13:14 ` Garrett Marone
2002-02-05 18:41 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-05 21:00 ` Drew P. Vogel
2002-02-05 21:19 ` Andreas Tscharner
2002-02-06 8:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-11 17:01 ` Andrew Scott [this message]
2002-02-11 17:37 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-02-05 21:22 ` James Stevenson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-05 21:13 Brenneke, Matthew Jeffrey (UMR-Student)
2002-02-06 5:08 ` Stevie O
2002-02-05 21:35 Little, John
[not found] <B0C77D98347F826499A03C1FE22DE33B@william.fitzgerald2.beer. com>
2002-02-06 5:12 ` Stevie O
2002-02-06 5:24 ` Ruben Safir
2002-02-06 10:09 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-06 10:30 ` Stevie O
2002-02-06 5:52 Anthony Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C67B28E.5199.18B551@localhost \
--to=a.j.scott@casdn.neu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.