From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Lord <lord@sgi.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:47:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C782A00.CBB858EA@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C773C02.93C7753E@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <1014449389.1003.149.camel@phantasy.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3C774AC8.5E0848A2@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3C77F503.1060005@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <p73y9hjq5mw.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de> <3C78045C.668AB945@zip.com.au> <3C780702.9060109@sgi.com> <3C780CDA.FEAF9CB4@zip.com.au> <3C781362.7070103@sgi.com> <3C781909.F69D8791@zip.com.au>, <3C781909.F69D8791@zip.com.au> <20020223230755.GO20060@matchmail.com>
Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 02:34:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Unfortunately I seem to have found a bug in existing ext2, a bug
> > in existing block_write_full_page, a probable bug in the aic7xxx
> > driver, and an oops in the aic7xxx driver. So progress has slowed
> > down a bit :(
>
> Are these bugs in 2.4 also?
The test case is:
- 120 megabyte filesystem, 1k blocksize ext2. SMP.
- run `dbench 64 2>/dev/null >/dev/null', as root (dunno
if rootness matters, but it affects ext2 allocation policy).
This really hammers the out-of-space handling.
We get a stream of `__block_prepare_write: zeroing uptodate buffer'
messages. I added that message. I shall work out whether there's
a bug, or if the message just gets killed. This happens in 2.4 also.
We get a handful of `VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer' messages,
coming from this code:
/* Next simple case - plain lookup or failed read of indirect block */
if (!create || err == -EIO) {
cleanup:
while (partial > chain) {
brelse(partial->bh);
partial--;
}
in ext2_get_block(). This only happens in 2.5. It happens on uniprocessor.
Possibly a bug introduced by the changed ext2 locking in 2.5. I have not
investigated further.
With my I/O scheduling changes the SCSI driver gets all upset about
data overruns or such. This may be my fault. It's a 2.5 issue.
During recovery from the data overrun, the SCSI driver oopses
over manipulation of a dodgy-looking timer struct.
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-23 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1014444810.1003.53.camel@phantasy.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C773C02.93C7753E@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1014449389.1003.149.camel@phantasy.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C774AC8.5E0848A2@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C77F503.1060005@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C77FB35.16844FE7@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-02-23 20:56 ` [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops Andi Kleen
2002-02-23 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 21:17 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-23 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 22:10 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-23 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 23:07 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-23 23:47 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-02-25 13:02 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-25 13:12 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-25 13:18 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-25 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-25 19:45 ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25 20:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 6:13 Robert Love
2002-02-23 6:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 7:29 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 7:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 11:38 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 18:20 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 19:06 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 21:57 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-23 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 22:23 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 22:48 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 23:13 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 23:45 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-24 1:05 ` yodaiken
2002-02-24 1:08 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 22:00 ` John Levon
2002-02-23 22:43 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 20:01 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-23 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 9:38 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C782A00.CBB858EA@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.