All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:47:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C79435E.8030208@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200202241352.g1ODqeb08003.aeb@apps.cwi.nl>

Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
>>Since this apparently didn't get through to the mailing list
>>I'm sending it again. This time compressed.
>>
> 
> Pity - noncompressed is better, now only people with too much time
> will look at it.
> 
> There is something else one might do.
> In ide-geometry.c there is the routine probe_cmos_for_drives().
> Long ago I already wrote "Eventually the entire routine below
> should be removed". I think this is the proper time to do this.
> 
> This probe is done only for the i386 architecture, and only
> for the first two IDE disks, and only influences their geometry.
> It has been a pain - for example, it gives the first two disks
> a different geometry from the others, which is inconvenient
> when one want a RAID of identical disks.
>
Basically I lend toward your arguments. I think too that a bios based
detection is already right and then we have now the ide-skip kernel
parameter which is allowing to exclude a drive from handling by the 
linux ide driver anyway. And I think that 2.4.x and above don't run on
i386's anymore anyway.




  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-24 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-24 13:52 [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt Andries.Brouwer
2002-02-24 19:47 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-02-24 19:54   ` arjan
2002-02-24 20:02     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 20:45       ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-24 21:05         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 21:03       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-24 19:58   ` [PATCH] IDE clean 13 Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 21:17     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 20:02   ` [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt Eric Krout
2002-02-24 20:41     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-28  9:44   ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-28 14:19     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-28 18:01       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-28 18:13         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-25 11:45 ` Paul Gortmaker
2002-02-25 12:03   ` Martin Dalecki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25  1:29 Andries.Brouwer
2002-02-25  1:33 Andries.Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C79435E.8030208@evision-ventures.com \
    --to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.