From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <p_gortmaker@yahoo.com>
Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:03:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7A282B.6010208@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200202241352.g1ODqeb08003.aeb@apps.cwi.nl> <3C7A23E4.5EF118D1@yahoo.com>
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
>
>
>>There is something else one might do.
>>In ide-geometry.c there is the routine probe_cmos_for_drives().
>>Long ago I already wrote "Eventually the entire routine below
>>should be removed". I think this is the proper time to do this.
>>
>
> Yes, I saw this & looked over my mail - we had similar discussion
> & similar conclusion back in May 2000. (Others may also find aeb's
> notes from this old discussion useful - check the archives)
>
>
>>So, it is good to rip this out and push the inconvenience to
>>people with ancient hardware. (People with MFM disks may need
>>boot parameters now.)
>>
>
> As a matter of fact, they would have needed to do so even since
> 2.3.28, when drive->present was no longer set. Also from that
> 2 year old discussion is this patch to set capacity for non-IDE
> drives. Fact is that ST-506 would even to this day not work with
> the ide driver without this patch. (Of course using hd.c on ST-506
> era machines makes a lot more sense anyways, so this is pretty
> much moot.)
>
> Paul.
I have already applied the CMOS probe removal patch to my personal tree
and it turns out any obvious things. However I still don't see how it
may simplify the ide.c code further...
to indeed not break
>
> diff -u linux-r/drivers/ide-old/ide-disk.c linux-r/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
> --- linux-r/drivers/ide-old/ide-disk.c Fri May 26 16:37:43 2000
> +++ linux-r/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c Sat May 27 14:33:27 2000
> @@ -519,7 +519,6 @@
>
> /*
> * Compute drive->capacity, the full capacity of the drive
> - * Called with drive->id != NULL.
> */
> static void init_idedisk_capacity (ide_drive_t *drive)
> {
> @@ -529,7 +528,7 @@
> drive->select.b.lba = 0;
>
> /* Determine capacity, and use LBA if the drive properly supports it */
> - if ((id->capability & 2) && lba_capacity_is_ok(id)) {
> + if (id != NULL && (id->capability & 2) && lba_capacity_is_ok(id)) {
> capacity = id->lba_capacity;
> drive->cyl = capacity / (drive->head * drive->sect);
> drive->select.b.lba = 1;
> @@ -759,8 +758,10 @@
>
> idedisk_add_settings(drive);
>
> - if (id == NULL)
> + if (id == NULL) { /* Old, non-IDE drive */
> + init_idedisk_capacity(drive);
> return;
> + }
>
> /*
> * CompactFlash cards and their brethern look just like hard drives
>
>
>
--
- phone: +49 214 8656 283
- job: eVision-Ventures AG, LEV .de (MY OPINIONS ARE MY OWN!)
- langs: de_DE.ISO8859-1, en_US, pl_PL.ISO8859-2, last ressort: ru_RU.KOI8-R
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-24 13:52 [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt Andries.Brouwer
2002-02-24 19:47 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 19:54 ` arjan
2002-02-24 20:02 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 20:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-24 21:05 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 21:03 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-24 19:58 ` [PATCH] IDE clean 13 Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 21:17 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 20:02 ` [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt Eric Krout
2002-02-24 20:41 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-28 9:44 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-28 14:19 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-28 18:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-28 18:13 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-25 11:45 ` Paul Gortmaker
2002-02-25 12:03 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25 1:29 Andries.Brouwer
2002-02-25 1:33 Andries.Brouwer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C7A282B.6010208@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p_gortmaker@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.