All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* inode number mismatch message
@ 2002-04-04  8:28 Kent, Ian I.
  2002-04-04  9:04 ` James Pearson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kent, Ian I. @ 2002-04-04  8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'nfs@lists.sourceforge.net'


I recently got a rash of messages like these in the logs on our Linux
clients:

Mar 24 04:02:00 csl024 syslogd 1.4-0: restart.
Mar 24 04:02:00 csl024 syslogd 1.4-0: restart.
Mar 24 23:50:13 csl024 kernel: nfs: server perseus is not responding
Mar 24 23:50:28 csl024 kernel: nfs: server perseus OK
Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c6d/0x4), got
(0xa000013c6d/0x4)
Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c69/0x4), got
(0xa000013c69/0x4)
Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c6d/0x4), got
(0xa000013c6d/0x4)
Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c69/0x4), got
(0xa000013c69/0x4)

They appeared after the server (Solaris) to which the Linux (2.4.17 kernel
with Tronds' patches) was upgraded from 2.6 to 2.8 while there were active
mounts.

I know it's a big ask to expect the client to be OK though such an activity,
but the comment is 'the Solaris clients were OK after the upgrade'.

I would appreciate an feedback on whether this is something that should
fixable or not.

Regards 
Ian Kent

_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: inode number mismatch message
  2002-04-04  8:28 inode number mismatch message Kent, Ian I.
@ 2002-04-04  9:04 ` James Pearson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Pearson @ 2002-04-04  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kent, Ian I.; +Cc: nfs

A previous message from Trond had a workaround:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-nfs&m=101316526524213&w=2

I believe this change is in Trond's 2.4.18 patches ...

James Pearson


"Kent, Ian I." wrote:
> 
> I recently got a rash of messages like these in the logs on our Linux
> clients:
> 
> Mar 24 04:02:00 csl024 syslogd 1.4-0: restart.
> Mar 24 04:02:00 csl024 syslogd 1.4-0: restart.
> Mar 24 23:50:13 csl024 kernel: nfs: server perseus is not responding
> Mar 24 23:50:28 csl024 kernel: nfs: server perseus OK
> Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
> Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c6d/0x4), got
> (0xa000013c6d/0x4)
> Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
> Mar 24 23:51:43 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c69/0x4), got
> (0xa000013c69/0x4)
> Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
> Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c6d/0x4), got
> (0xa000013c6d/0x4)
> Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
> Mar 24 23:52:58 csl024 kernel: expected (0x2813c69/0x4), got
> (0xa000013c69/0x4)
> 
> They appeared after the server (Solaris) to which the Linux (2.4.17 kernel
> with Tronds' patches) was upgraded from 2.6 to 2.8 while there were active
> mounts.
> 
> I know it's a big ask to expect the client to be OK though such an activity,
> but the comment is 'the Solaris clients were OK after the upgrade'.
> 
> I would appreciate an feedback on whether this is something that should
> fixable or not.
> 
> Regards
> Ian Kent
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-04  9:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-04  8:28 inode number mismatch message Kent, Ian I.
2002-04-04  9:04 ` James Pearson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.