* Saving RAM on an all-RAM system by compressing executables?
@ 2002-04-21 0:06 Dan Kegel
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dan Kegel @ 2002-04-21 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
I'm working with an all-RAM system (where a host processor pokes
the linux kernel and initial ramdisk into RAM, then releases the
reset line). The kernel is 2.4.17 or so.
I have only 64 MB (or 32 or 16, depending), so every megabyte is precious.
The C++ app I'm running on this system is 5MB, kinda fat.
I'd like to save a couple megabytes somehow, either by compressing
the executable, or by using execute-in-place.
I made a cramfs image of the app; that shrunk it from 5MB down to 2MB.
You can't mount cramfs images from tmpfs, so I made a little ramfs,
and loopback mounted it from there, then measured ram usage on a 64MB system
with the app both running and not running.
/bin/free reported (kb):
in tmpfs, not running: 47888
in tmpfs, running: 47244
in cramfs, not running:46972
in cramfs, running: 46336
Looks like I lose! Using cramfs to compress the app appears to
*waste* a megabyte over just using the noncompressed app.
>From what I can tell, there's no support for execute-in-place
except on MIPS with a hacked gcc.
OK, I've exhausted my stock of clever ideas; does anyone have
a suggestion about how to save RAM in my situation?
(gzexe won't do it, nor will upx, as they all create a temporary
uncompressed file on execution...)
Thanks,
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-04-21 0:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-21 0:06 Saving RAM on an all-RAM system by compressing executables? Dan Kegel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.