* about crash
@ 2002-04-25 14:48 Yura Umanets
[not found] ` <1061290531.20020425170549@tnonline.net>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Yura Umanets @ 2002-04-25 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list; +Cc: andewid
New program on http://reiserfs.linux.kiev.ua/lookup.
Please reapeat all actions and send me root leaf dump.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1061290531.20020425170549@tnonline.net>]
[parent not found: <3CC81E0F.90000@priocom.com>]
[parent not found: <1672863140.20020425173202@tnonline.net>]
* Re: about crash [not found] ` <1672863140.20020425173202@tnonline.net> @ 2002-04-25 15:57 ` Yura Umanets [not found] ` <1294772062.20020425180352@tnonline.net> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Yura Umanets @ 2002-04-25 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anders Widman; +Cc: reiserfs-list Anders Widman wrote: > I ran dd with blocksize 4096, though I'm not sure this is the actual > blocksize. Can I verify the blocksize easilly? Possible debugreiserfs can show it... Yes, try this. debugreiserfs /dev/hda1 | grep ^Blocksize > > Anyway. I attacked the output to this e-mail. > > This is what I did: > > [root@server demos]# ./lookup /dev/Server/FTPRoot 1 2 0 0 > Information: Specified item found inside the leaf 669227 at position 0. Seems right, however root-file you sent not a valid root leaf block. It contains rubbish. Try this: debugreiserf /dev/Server/FTPRoot -B 669227 And send me out. If you'll see your root directories (at leat lost+found), then 669227 is right number. > > [root@server demos]# dd if=/dev/Server/FTPRoot bs=4096 skip=669226 count=1 of=/root-file It's may be joke :) You have compressed 4096 bytes file by bz2 and it size at the moment 4596 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1294772062.20020425180352@tnonline.net>]
* Re: about crash [not found] ` <1294772062.20020425180352@tnonline.net> @ 2002-04-25 16:17 ` Yura Umanets [not found] ` <1685846437.20020425182146@tnonline.net> [not found] ` <888141406.20020425190001@tnonline.net> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Yura Umanets @ 2002-04-25 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anders Widman; +Cc: reiserfs-list Anders Widman wrote: > Hello again! > > Wouldn't debugreiserfs -B exytract all bad blocks to a file? debugreiserfs -B some_block just will be trying to show contains of the given block. If this block contains direntry, then it will show it. This is a part of my root: [root@banshee tmp]$ debugreiserfs /dev/hda1 -B 13715 <-------------debugreiserfs, 2002-------------> reiserfsprogs 3.x.1b-pre4 13715 is used in ondisk bitmap =================================================================== LEAF NODE (13715) contains level=1, nr_items=6, free_space=140 rdkey (real items 6) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |###|type|ilen|f/sp| loc|fmt|fsck| key | | | | |e/cn| | |need| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0|1 2 0x0 SD (0), len 44, location 4052 entry count 0, fsck need 0, format new| (NEW SD), mode drwxr-xr-x, size 448, nlink 16, mtime 04/21/2002 04:23:03 blocks 1, uid 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 1|1 2 0x1 DIR (3), len 448, location 3604 entry count 18, fsck need 0, format old| ###: Name length Object key Hash Gen number 0: ". "( 1) 1 2 0 1, loc 440, state 4 not set 1: ".. "( 2) 0 1 0 2, loc 432, state 4 not set 2: "bin "( 3) 2 16950 2318336 0, loc 424, state 4 "r5" 3: "dev "( 3) 2 17415 2354688 0, loc 416, state 4 "r5" 4: "etc "( 3) 2 18 2401792 0, loc 408, state 4 "r5" 5: "lib "( 3) 2 517 2529152 0, loc 400, state 4 "r5" 6: "mnt "( 3) 2 18693 2563328 0, loc 392, state 4 "r5" 7: "tmp "( 3) 2 17418 2711168 0, loc 384, state 4 "r5" 8: "var "( 3) 2 17417 2730880 0, loc 376, state 4 "r5" 9: "usr "( 3) 2 3 2744576 0, loc 368, state 4 "r5" 10: "boot "( 4) 2 17127 25652864 0, loc 360, state 4 "r5" 11: "home "( 4) 2 18692 27051904 0, loc 352, state 4 "r5" 12: "proc "( 4) 2 17416 29009280 0, loc 344, state 4 "r5" 13: "sbin "( 4) 2 47 29360256 0, loc 336, state 4 "r5" 14: "root "( 4) 2 18708 29415552 0, loc 328, state 4 "r5" 15: ".autofs "( 7) 2 16939 294236416 0, loc 320, state 4 "r5" 16: "quota.group "( 11) 2 426388 1105062784 0, loc 304, state 4 "r5" 17: "quota.user "( 10) 2 23274 2056011904 0, loc 288, state 4 "r5" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1685846437.20020425182146@tnonline.net>]
* Re: about crash [not found] ` <1685846437.20020425182146@tnonline.net> @ 2002-04-25 16:40 ` Yura Umanets 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Yura Umanets @ 2002-04-25 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ReiserFS List Anders Widman wrote: > ok.. This is the output I get when running "debugreiserfs > /dev/Server/FTPRoot -B" > > > <-------------debugreiserfs, 2002-------------> > reiserfsprogs 3.x.1c-pre2 > > debugreiserfs: option requires an argument -- B > > Filesystem state: consistent > > Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x3a00 of format 3.6 with standard journal > Count of blocks on the device: 213532672 > Number of bitmaps: 6517 > Blocksize: 4096 > Free blocks (count of blocks - used [journal, bitmaps, data, reserved] blocks): > 20694828 > Root block: 67992 > Filesystem is cleanly umounted > Tree height: 5 > Hash function used to sort names: "r5" > Objectid map size 550, max 972 > Journal parameters: > Device [0x0] > Magic [0x0] > Size 8193 blocks (including 1 for journal header) (first block 18) > Max transaction length 0 blocks > Max batch size 0 blocks > Max commit age 0 > Blocks reserved by journal: 0 > Fs state field: 0x0 > sb_version: 2 > inode generation number: 52783 > UUID: ce0c6cd1-e381-4597-bd30-edc0074968ab > LABEL: > Set flags in SB: > > > > This is what I get when running "debugreiserfs /dev/Server/FTPRoot -B > 669227": > > > [root@server /]# debugreiserfs /dev/Server/FTPRoot -B 669227 > > <-------------debugreiserfs, 2002-------------> > reiserfsprogs 3.x.1c-pre2 > > Will try to extract list of bad blocks and save it to '669227' file > Done > > > I end up with a file called 669227 which is 0 bytes long. I'll try > with the same version of debugreiserfs as you are running. > > You should be using debugreiserfs /dev/Server/FTPRoot -1 669227 -- Yury Umanets, IT Engeneer of Priocom Corp. Phone: +380 44 4924636, ICQ: 55494590 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <888141406.20020425190001@tnonline.net>]
[parent not found: <3CC8377F.6010400@priocom.com>]
[parent not found: <918425062.20020425190444@tnonline.net>]
* Re: Re: about crash [not found] ` <918425062.20020425190444@tnonline.net> @ 2002-04-25 17:39 ` Yura Umanets [not found] ` <310382968.20020425193723@tnonline.net> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Yura Umanets @ 2002-04-25 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anders Widman; +Cc: ReiserFS List I've checked your lost+found dir. And I think it contains "." and ".." entries. This is some part of output ./progsreiserfs-0.3.0/demos/ls /dev/Server/FTPRoot /lost+found [root@server demos]# ./ls /dev/Server/FTPRoot /lost+found . .. 42555_11634 42555_16819 42555_23482 42555_24549 42555_25089 42555_30440 42555_42703 42555_42710 42555_46086 42555_46088 42555_46090 42555_48062 42555_48119 42555_48135 42555_48848 42555_48851 32214_32216 18373_18376 20163_20164 20163_20167 20163_20168 19191_19192 19191_19193 28_29 29734_29735 29734_29736 29734_29737 29734_29738 29734_29739 29734_29740 29734_29741 29734_29742 25631_25632 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <310382968.20020425193723@tnonline.net>]
* Re: Re: about crash [not found] ` <310382968.20020425193723@tnonline.net> @ 2002-04-25 17:57 ` Yura Umanets 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Yura Umanets @ 2002-04-25 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anders Widman; +Cc: ReiserFS List Anders Widman wrote: > What do you think the problem is then? If I try to rename (mv) a > folder (and perhaps files) from lost+found the kernel would crash. Since "." and ".." entries actually exist. I don't know what is the problem. Possible direntry of lost+found directory isn't valid. mv command modify it by corresponding sys_call and oops. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-25 17:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-25 14:48 about crash Yura Umanets
[not found] ` <1061290531.20020425170549@tnonline.net>
[not found] ` <3CC81E0F.90000@priocom.com>
[not found] ` <1672863140.20020425173202@tnonline.net>
2002-04-25 15:57 ` Yura Umanets
[not found] ` <1294772062.20020425180352@tnonline.net>
2002-04-25 16:17 ` Yura Umanets
[not found] ` <1685846437.20020425182146@tnonline.net>
2002-04-25 16:40 ` Yura Umanets
[not found] ` <888141406.20020425190001@tnonline.net>
[not found] ` <3CC8377F.6010400@priocom.com>
[not found] ` <918425062.20020425190444@tnonline.net>
2002-04-25 17:39 ` Yura Umanets
[not found] ` <310382968.20020425193723@tnonline.net>
2002-04-25 17:57 ` Yura Umanets
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.