khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]

khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]

[Dan Kegel]

thunder@ngforever.de wrote:
> (Unfortunately crashed shortly after completion when 
> I modprobed khttpd and tried to make a connection ...

Does the khttpd patch I posted fix your khttpd crash?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102068445316516&w=2

- Dan

Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]

[Thunder from the hill]

Hi,

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Does the khttpd patch I posted fix your khttpd crash?
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102068445316516&w=2

I was working on Mandrake 8.0 Linux 2.4.8, which was precompiled, sorry. I 
don't even have the sources for their kernel. I try replacing it all with 
the latest kernel, then I'll see...
It was just about the compression, I can't help with this kernel. I'll try 
out the latest khttpd when I got so far.

Regards,
Thunder
-- 
if (errno == ENOTAVAIL)
    fprintf(stderr, "Error: Talking to Microsoft server!\n");

Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression "benchmark"]

[Thunder from the hill]

Hi,

On Mon, 6 May 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102068445316516&w=2

I just stumbled upon the old Mandrake kernel on some backup. Do you want 
me to dig it out and check khttpd against it? I could do if you can be 
supported likewise, and I have sufficient number of workstations standing 
around to check it on one of them...

Regards,
Thunder
-- 
if (errno == ENOTAVAIL)
    fprintf(stderr, "Error: Talking to Microsoft server!\n");

Re: khttpd patch [was: gzip vs. bzip2 (mainly de-)compression"benchmark"]

[Dan Kegel]

Thunder from the hill wrote:
> On Mon, 6 May 2002, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102068445316516&w=2
> 
> I just stumbled upon the old Mandrake kernel on some backup. Do you want
> me to dig it out and check khttpd against it? I could do if you can be
> supported likewise, and I have sufficient number of workstations standing
> around to check it on one of them...

No, that's ok, don't go to any trouble to check khttpd on an old kernel.

Thanks,
Dan