* kernel warning
@ 2002-05-09 15:29 Robert Singleton
2002-05-09 17:24 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Robert Singleton @ 2002-05-09 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-smp
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 662 bytes --]
Hello,
I found the following warning in the kernel boot message:
WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
Is this of concern? I'm running Red Hat 7.2 on a Dell 620
Workstation. I've included the entire kernel boot message
as an attachment.
Thanks very much.
--
Robert Singleton office: (505)-667-8420
X-7 Material Science fax : (505)-665-0218
Los Alamos National Laboratory email : bobs1@lanl.gov
P.O. Box 1663, MSP223 MS : P223
Los Alamos, NM 87545
RSA encryption-key finger print for bobs1@lanl.gov:
48:3A:11:2E:7A:F4:A2:41:83:B4:CD:1E:36:90:DB:22
[-- Attachment #2: dmesg.out --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 14597 bytes --]
Linux version 2.4.7-10smp (bhcompile@stripples.devel.redhat.com) (gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)) #1 SMP Thu Sep 6 17:09:31 EDT 2001
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000007ff9e000 (usable)
BIOS-e820: 000000007ff9e000 - 0000000080000000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee10000 (reserved)
BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
Scanning bios EBDA for MXT signature
1151MB HIGHMEM available.
found SMP MP-table at 000fe710
hm, page 000fe000 reserved twice.
hm, page 000ff000 reserved twice.
hm, page 000f0000 reserved twice.
On node 0 totalpages: 524190
zone(0): 4096 pages.
zone(1): 225280 pages.
zone(2): 294814 pages.
Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4
Virtual Wire compatibility mode.
OEM ID: DELL Product ID: WS 620 APIC at: 0xFEE00000
Processor #0 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17
Processor #1 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17
I/O APIC #2 Version 32 at 0xFEC00000.
Processors: 2
Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/sdb7 hdd=ide-scsi
ide_setup: hdd=ide-scsi
Initializing CPU#0
Detected 993.346 MHz processor.
Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
Calibrating delay loop... 1979.18 BogoMIPS
Memory: 2056476k/2096760k available (1396k kernel code, 37852k reserved, 102k data, 240k init, 1179256k highmem)
Dentry-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
Mount-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
Buffer-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
Page-cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 256K
Intel machine check architecture supported.
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au)
mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel
CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 256K
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 06
per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 731.63 usecs.
enabled ExtINT on CPU#0
ESR value before enabling vector: 00000040
ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
Booting processor 1/1 eip 2000
Initializing CPU#1
masked ExtINT on CPU#1
ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000
ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
Calibrating delay loop... 1985.74 BogoMIPS
CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0
CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
CPU: L2 cache: 256K
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
CPU1: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 06
Total of 2 processors activated (3964.92 BogoMIPS).
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 2 ... ok.
init IO_APIC IRQs
IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-0, 2-13, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22, 2-23 not connected.
..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
number of MP IRQ sources: 62.
number of IO-APIC #2 registers: 24.
testing the IO APIC.......................
IO APIC #2......
.... register #00: 02000000
....... : physical APIC id: 02
.... register #01: 00170020
....... : max redirection entries: 0017
....... : IO APIC version: 0020
WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
.... register #02: 00000000
....... : arbitration: 00
.... IRQ redirection table:
NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect:
00 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
01 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39
02 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31
03 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 41
04 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 49
05 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 51
06 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 59
07 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 61
08 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 69
09 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 71
0a 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 79
0b 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 81
0c 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 89
0d 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0e 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 91
0f 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 99
10 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A1
11 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A9
12 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B1
13 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B9
14 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
15 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
16 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
17 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
IRQ to pin mappings:
IRQ0 -> 0:2
IRQ1 -> 0:1
IRQ3 -> 0:3
IRQ4 -> 0:4
IRQ5 -> 0:5
IRQ6 -> 0:6
IRQ7 -> 0:7
IRQ8 -> 0:8
IRQ9 -> 0:9
IRQ10 -> 0:10
IRQ11 -> 0:11
IRQ12 -> 0:12
IRQ14 -> 0:14
IRQ15 -> 0:15
IRQ16 -> 0:16
IRQ17 -> 0:17
IRQ18 -> 0:18
IRQ19 -> 0:19
.................................... done.
Using local APIC timer interrupts.
calibrating APIC timer ...
..... CPU clock speed is 993.2697 MHz.
..... host bus clock speed is 132.4358 MHz.
cpu: 0, clocks: 1324358, slice: 441452
CPU0<T0:1324352,T1:882896,D:4,S:441452,C:1324358>
cpu: 1, clocks: 1324358, slice: 441452
CPU1<T0:1324352,T1:441440,D:8,S:441452,C:1324358>
checking TSC synchronization across CPUs: passed.
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfc03e, last bus=4
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 1: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX [8086/2410] at 00:1f.0
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I31,P3) -> 19
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I31,P1) -> 17
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B1,I0,P0) -> 16
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I3,P0) -> 19
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I4,P0) -> 16
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I5,P0) -> 17
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I5,P1) -> 18
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I7,P0) -> 19
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I8,P0) -> 16
PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I10,P0) -> 18
isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards...
isapnp: No Plug & Play device found
Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
Initializing RT netlink socket
apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.14)
apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.
mxt_scan_bios: enter
Starting kswapd v1.8
allocated 64 pages and 64 bhs reserved for the highmem bounces
VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized
pty: 2048 Unix98 ptys configured
Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI ISAPNP enabled
ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
Real Time Clock Driver v1.10d
block: queued sectors max/low 1365330kB/1234258kB, 4032 slots per queue
RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
ide: Assuming 33MHz PCI bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
PIIX4: chipset revision 2
PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
ide0: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
ide1: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA
hda: IOMEGA ZIP 250 ATAPI, ATAPI FLOPPY drive
hdc: _NEC DV-5800A, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdd: SONY CD-RW CRX140E, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
ide-floppy driver 0.97
hda: No disk in drive
hda: 244736kB, 239/64/32 CHS, 4096 kBps, 512 sector size, 2941 rpm
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306
ide-floppy driver 0.97
md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
md: autorun ...
md: ... autorun DONE.
NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
IP: routing cache hash table of 16384 buckets, 128Kbytes
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 524288 bind 65536)
Linux IP multicast router 0.06 plus PIM-SM
NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
Freeing initrd memory: 445k freed
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
(scsi0) <Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter> found at PCI 4/5/0
(scsi0) Wide Channel A, SCSI ID=7, 32/255 SCBs
(scsi0) Downloading sequencer code... 396 instructions downloaded
(scsi1) <Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter> found at PCI 4/5/1
(scsi1) Wide Channel B, SCSI ID=7, 32/255 SCBs
(scsi1) Downloading sequencer code... 396 instructions downloaded
scsi0 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.2.4/5.2.0
<Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter>
scsi1 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.2.4/5.2.0
<Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter>
Vendor: QUANTUM Model: ATLAS10K2-TY367L Rev: DA40
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
Vendor: FUJITSU Model: MAJ3364MP Rev: 5508
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 04
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0
(scsi0:0:0:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 127.
SCSI device sda: 71132959 512-byte hdwr sectors (36420 MB)
Partition check:
sda: sda1 sda2 < sda5 >
(scsi0:0:1:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 127.
SCSI device sdb: 71132959 512-byte hdwr sectors (36420 MB)
sdb: sdb1 sdb2 < sdb5 sdb6 sdb7 >
Journalled Block Device driver loaded
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 240k freed
Adding Swap: 265032k swap-space (priority -1)
Adding Swap: 265032k swap-space (priority -2)
usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs
usb.c: registered new driver hub
usb-uhci.c: $Revision: 1.259 $ time 17:18:11 Sep 6 2001
usb-uhci.c: High bandwidth mode enabled
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:1f.2 to 64
usb-uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0xff80, IRQ 19
usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports
usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
hub.c: USB hub found
hub.c: 2 ports detected
usb-uhci.c: v1.251:USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver
EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.8, 25 Aug 2001 on sd(8,23), internal journal
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.8, 25 Aug 2001 on sd(8,17), internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
hdc: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM drive, 512kB Cache, UDMA(33)
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.12
scsi2 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
0x378: FIFO is 16 bytes
0x378: writeIntrThreshold is 8
0x378: readIntrThreshold is 8
0x378: PWord is 8 bits
0x378: Interrupts are ISA-Pulses
0x378: ECP port cfgA=0x14 cfgB=0x40
0x378: ECP settings irq=<none or set by other means> dma=<none or set by other means>
parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778) [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,EPP,ECP]
parport0: irq 7 detected
parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(08)
parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(08)
parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(08)
parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(08)
NET4: Linux IPX 0.47 for NET4.0
IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
IPX Portions Copyright (c) 2000, 2001 Conectiva, Inc.
NET4: AppleTalk 0.18a for Linux NET4.0
Creative EMU10K1 PCI Audio Driver, version 0.7, 17:18:51 Sep 6 2001
emu10k1: EMU10K1 rev 7 model 0x8022 found, IO at 0xece0-0xecff, IRQ 19
CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
PPP generic driver version 2.4.1
PPP BSD Compression module registered
PPP Deflate Compression module registered
hda: 244766kB, 489532 blocks, 512 sector size
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
hda: hda4
EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-05-09 15:29 kernel warning Robert Singleton
@ 2002-05-09 17:24 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir G. Ivanovic @ 2002-05-09 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bobs1; +Cc: linux-smp
Allegedly not. It merely means that your motherboard is not recognized
as being OK.
My /proc/interrupts (different motherboard) looks like:
CPU0 CPU1
0: 9208532 8999909 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 49949 49416 IO-APIC-edge keyboard
2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade
5: 461657 462659 IO-APIC-level es1371, usb-uhci, usb-uhci
8: 61549507 61639660 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 308474 307759 IO-APIC-level sym53c8xx
10: 3155516 3157266 IO-APIC-level eth0
11: 173 162 IO-APIC-level sym53c8xx
12: 715163 714417 IO-APIC-edge PS/2 Mouse
14: 48981 49208 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 728205 724269 IO-APIC-edge ide1
NMI: 0 0
LOC: 18208803 18208857
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
which tells me that both CPUs are receiving interrupts. Yours should
look similar.
Presumably there are no other errors on your system...
--- Vladimir
--------
Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://leonora.org/~vladimir
2770 Cowper St. vladimir@acm.org
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2447 +1 650 678 8014
"RS" == Robert Singleton <bobs1@lanl.gov> writes:
RS> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
RS> --------------010302060606050702060007
RS> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
RS> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
RS> Hello,
RS> I found the following warning in the kernel boot message:
RS> WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
RS> to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
RS> Is this of concern? I'm running Red Hat 7.2 on a Dell 620
RS> Workstation. I've included the entire kernel boot message
RS> as an attachment.
RS> Thanks very much.
RS> --
RS> Robert Singleton office: (505)-667-8420
RS> X-7 Material Science fax : (505)-665-0218
RS> Los Alamos National Laboratory email : bobs1@lanl.gov
RS> P.O. Box 1663, MSP223 MS : P223
RS> Los Alamos, NM 87545
RS> RSA encryption-key finger print for bobs1@lanl.gov:
RS> 48:3A:11:2E:7A:F4:A2:41:83:B4:CD:1E:36:90:DB:22
RS> --------------010302060606050702060007
RS> Content-Type: text/plain;
RS> name="dmesg.out"
RS> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
RS> Content-Disposition: inline;
RS> filename="dmesg.out"
RS> Linux version 2.4.7-10smp (bhcompile@stripples.devel.redhat.com) (gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-98)) #1 SMP Thu Sep 6 17:09:31 EDT 2001
RS> BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
RS> BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable)
RS> BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
RS> BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000007ff9e000 (usable)
RS> BIOS-e820: 000000007ff9e000 - 0000000080000000 (reserved)
RS> BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec10000 (reserved)
RS> BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee10000 (reserved)
RS> BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
RS> Scanning bios EBDA for MXT signature
RS> 1151MB HIGHMEM available.
RS> found SMP MP-table at 000fe710
RS> hm, page 000fe000 reserved twice.
RS> hm, page 000ff000 reserved twice.
RS> hm, page 000f0000 reserved twice.
RS> On node 0 totalpages: 524190
RS> zone(0): 4096 pages.
RS> zone(1): 225280 pages.
RS> zone(2): 294814 pages.
RS> Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4
RS> Virtual Wire compatibility mode.
RS> OEM ID: DELL Product ID: WS 620 APIC at: 0xFEE00000
RS> Processor #0 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17
RS> Processor #1 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17
RS> I/O APIC #2 Version 32 at 0xFEC00000.
RS> Processors: 2
RS> Kernel command line: ro root=/dev/sdb7 hdd=ide-scsi
RS> ide_setup: hdd=ide-scsi
RS> Initializing CPU#0
RS> Detected 993.346 MHz processor.
RS> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
RS> Calibrating delay loop... 1979.18 BogoMIPS
RS> Memory: 2056476k/2096760k available (1396k kernel code, 37852k reserved, 102k data, 240k init, 1179256k highmem)
RS> Dentry-cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes)
RS> Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes)
RS> Mount-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes)
RS> Buffer-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 524288 bytes)
RS> Page-cache hash table entries: 524288 (order: 10, 4194304 bytes)
RS> CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0
RS> CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
RS> CPU: L2 cache: 256K
RS> Intel machine check architecture supported.
RS> Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
RS> CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
RS> Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
RS> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
RS> POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
RS> mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au)
RS> mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel
RS> CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0
RS> CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
RS> CPU: L2 cache: 256K
RS> Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
RS> CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 06
RS> per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 731.63 usecs.
RS> enabled ExtINT on CPU#0
RS> ESR value before enabling vector: 00000040
RS> ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
RS> Booting processor 1/1 eip 2000
RS> Initializing CPU#1
RS> masked ExtINT on CPU#1
RS> ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000
RS> ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
RS> Calibrating delay loop... 1985.74 BogoMIPS
RS> CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0
RS> CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K
RS> CPU: L2 cache: 256K
RS> Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
RS> CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000
RS> CPU1: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 06
RS> Total of 2 processors activated (3964.92 BogoMIPS).
RS> ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
RS> ...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 2 ... ok.
RS> init IO_APIC IRQs
RS> IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-0, 2-13, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22, 2-23 not connected.
RS> ..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
RS> number of MP IRQ sources: 62.
RS> number of IO-APIC #2 registers: 24.
RS> testing the IO APIC.......................
RS> IO APIC #2......
RS> .... register #00: 02000000
RS> ....... : physical APIC id: 02
RS> .... register #01: 00170020
RS> ....... : max redirection entries: 0017
RS> ....... : IO APIC version: 0020
RS> WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
RS> to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
RS> .... register #02: 00000000
RS> ....... : arbitration: 00
RS> .... IRQ redirection table:
RS> NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect:
RS> 00 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
RS> 01 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39
RS> 02 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31
RS> 03 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 41
RS> 04 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 49
RS> 05 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 51
RS> 06 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 59
RS> 07 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 61
RS> 08 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 69
RS> 09 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 71
RS> 0a 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 79
RS> 0b 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 81
RS> 0c 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 89
RS> 0d 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
RS> 0e 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 91
RS> 0f 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 99
RS> 10 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A1
RS> 11 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A9
RS> 12 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B1
RS> 13 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B9
RS> 14 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
RS> 15 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
RS> 16 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
RS> 17 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
RS> IRQ to pin mappings:
RS> IRQ0 -> 0:2
RS> IRQ1 -> 0:1
RS> IRQ3 -> 0:3
RS> IRQ4 -> 0:4
RS> IRQ5 -> 0:5
RS> IRQ6 -> 0:6
RS> IRQ7 -> 0:7
RS> IRQ8 -> 0:8
RS> IRQ9 -> 0:9
RS> IRQ10 -> 0:10
RS> IRQ11 -> 0:11
RS> IRQ12 -> 0:12
RS> IRQ14 -> 0:14
RS> IRQ15 -> 0:15
RS> IRQ16 -> 0:16
RS> IRQ17 -> 0:17
RS> IRQ18 -> 0:18
RS> IRQ19 -> 0:19
RS> .................................... done.
RS> Using local APIC timer interrupts.
RS> calibrating APIC timer ...
RS> ..... CPU clock speed is 993.2697 MHz.
RS> ..... host bus clock speed is 132.4358 MHz.
RS> cpu: 0, clocks: 1324358, slice: 441452
RS> CPU0<T0:1324352,T1:882896,D:4,S:441452,C:1324358>
RS> cpu: 1, clocks: 1324358, slice: 441452
RS> CPU1<T0:1324352,T1:441440,D:8,S:441452,C:1324358>
RS> checking TSC synchronization across CPUs: passed.
RS> PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfc03e, last bus=4
RS> PCI: Using configuration type 1
RS> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
RS> Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
RS> Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
RS> Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
RS> Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
RS> Unknown bridge resource 1: assuming transparent
RS> Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
RS> Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
RS> PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX [8086/2410] at 00:1f.0
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I31,P3) -> 19
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I31,P1) -> 17
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B1,I0,P0) -> 16
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I3,P0) -> 19
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I4,P0) -> 16
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I5,P0) -> 17
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I5,P1) -> 18
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I7,P0) -> 19
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I8,P0) -> 16
PCI-> APIC IRQ transform: (B4,I10,P0) -> 18
RS> isapnp: Scanning for PnP cards...
RS> isapnp: No Plug & Play device found
RS> Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
RS> Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
RS> Initializing RT netlink socket
RS> apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.14)
RS> apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.
RS> mxt_scan_bios: enter
RS> Starting kswapd v1.8
RS> allocated 64 pages and 64 bhs reserved for the highmem bounces
RS> VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized
RS> pty: 2048 Unix98 ptys configured
RS> Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI ISAPNP enabled
RS> ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
RS> ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
RS> Real Time Clock Driver v1.10d
RS> block: queued sectors max/low 1365330kB/1234258kB, 4032 slots per queue
RS> RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize
RS> Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
RS> ide: Assuming 33MHz PCI bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
RS> PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
RS> PIIX4: chipset revision 2
RS> PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
RS> ide0: BM-DMA at 0xffa0-0xffa7, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
RS> ide1: BM-DMA at 0xffa8-0xffaf, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA
RS> hda: IOMEGA ZIP 250 ATAPI, ATAPI FLOPPY drive
RS> hdc: _NEC DV-5800A, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
RS> hdd: SONY CD-RW CRX140E, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
RS> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
RS> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
RS> ide-floppy driver 0.97
RS> hda: No disk in drive
RS> hda: 244736kB, 239/64/32 CHS, 4096 kBps, 512 sector size, 2941 rpm
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
RS> FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306
RS> ide-floppy driver 0.97
RS> md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
RS> md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
RS> md: autorun ...
RS> md: ... autorun DONE.
RS> NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
RS> IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
RS> IP: routing cache hash table of 16384 buckets, 128Kbytes
RS> TCP: Hash tables configured (established 524288 bind 65536)
RS> Linux IP multicast router 0.06 plus PIM-SM
RS> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
RS> RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
RS> Freeing initrd memory: 445k freed
RS> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
RS> SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
RS> (scsi0) <Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter> found at PCI 4/5/0
RS> (scsi0) Wide Channel A, SCSI ID=7, 32/255 SCBs
RS> (scsi0) Downloading sequencer code... 396 instructions downloaded
RS> (scsi1) <Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter> found at PCI 4/5/1
RS> (scsi1) Wide Channel B, SCSI ID=7, 32/255 SCBs
RS> (scsi1) Downloading sequencer code... 396 instructions downloaded
RS> scsi0 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.2.4/5.2.0
RS> <Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter>
RS> scsi1 : Adaptec AHA274x/284x/294x (EISA/VLB/PCI-Fast SCSI) 5.2.4/5.2.0
RS> <Adaptec AIC-7899 Ultra 160/m SCSI host adapter>
RS> Vendor: QUANTUM Model: ATLAS10K2-TY367L Rev: DA40
RS> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
RS> Vendor: FUJITSU Model: MAJ3364MP Rev: 5508
RS> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 04
RS> Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
RS> Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0
RS> (scsi0:0:0:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 127.
RS> SCSI device sda: 71132959 512-byte hdwr sectors (36420 MB)
RS> Partition check:
RS> sda: sda1 sda2 < sda5 >
RS> (scsi0:0:1:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 127.
RS> SCSI device sdb: 71132959 512-byte hdwr sectors (36420 MB)
RS> sdb: sdb1 sdb2 < sdb5 sdb6 sdb7 >
RS> Journalled Block Device driver loaded
RS> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
RS> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
RS> Freeing unused kernel memory: 240k freed
RS> Adding Swap: 265032k swap-space (priority -1)
RS> Adding Swap: 265032k swap-space (priority -2)
RS> usb.c: registered new driver usbdevfs
RS> usb.c: registered new driver hub
RS> usb-uhci.c: $Revision: 1.259 $ time 17:18:11 Sep 6 2001
RS> usb-uhci.c: High bandwidth mode enabled
RS> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 00:1f.2 to 64
RS> usb-uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0xff80, IRQ 19
RS> usb-uhci.c: Detected 2 ports
RS> usb.c: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
RS> hub.c: USB hub found
RS> hub.c: 2 ports detected
RS> usb-uhci.c: v1.251:USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver
RS> EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.8, 25 Aug 2001 on sd(8,23), internal journal
RS> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
RS> EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.8, 25 Aug 2001 on sd(8,17), internal journal
RS> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
RS> hdc: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM drive, 512kB Cache, UDMA(33)
RS> Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.12
RS> scsi2 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
RS> Vendor: SONY Model: CD-RW CRX140E Rev: 1.0n
RS> Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
RS> 0x378: FIFO is 16 bytes
RS> 0x378: writeIntrThreshold is 8
RS> 0x378: readIntrThreshold is 8
RS> 0x378: PWord is 8 bits
RS> 0x378: Interrupts are ISA-Pulses
RS> 0x378: ECP port cfgA=0x14 cfgB=0x40
RS> 0x378: ECP settings irq=<none or set by other means> dma=<none or set by other means>
RS> parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778) [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,EPP,ECP]
RS> parport0: irq 7 detected
RS> parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(08)
RS> parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(08)
RS> parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(08)
RS> parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(08)
RS> NET4: Linux IPX 0.47 for NET4.0
RS> IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
RS> IPX Portions Copyright (c) 2000, 2001 Conectiva, Inc.
RS> NET4: AppleTalk 0.18a for Linux NET4.0
RS> Creative EMU10K1 PCI Audio Driver, version 0.7, 17:18:51 Sep 6 2001
RS> emu10k1: EMU10K1 rev 7 model 0x8022 found, IO at 0xece0-0xecff, IRQ 19
RS> CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
RS> PPP generic driver version 2.4.1
RS> PPP BSD Compression module registered
RS> PPP Deflate Compression module registered
RS> hda: 244766kB, 489532 blocks, 512 sector size
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> hda: The disk reports a capacity of 250640384 bytes, but the drive only handles 250609664
RS> ide-floppy: hda: I/O error, pc = 5a, key = 5, asc = 24, ascq = 0
RS> hda: hda4
RS> EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
RS> --------------010302060606050702060007--
RS> -
RS> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-smp" in
RS> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
RS> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* kernel warning
@ 2002-10-27 4:23 Brian May
2002-10-28 12:57 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Brian May @ 2002-10-27 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SELinux
While compiling the kernel, 2.4.19, with the latest lsm-SE Linux
patches from Russell (I am not sure how to double check this; but it is
POLICYDB_VERSION 12), I happened to glance at my screen when this was
displayed:
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/bam/tmp/woody/selinux/kernel-image/kernel-image-2.4.19-i386-2.4.19/build-k6/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=k6 -Iinclude -nostdinc -I /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=hooks -c -o hooks.o hooks.c
hooks.c:66: warning: #warning "SELinux: The separate SELinux kernel patch has not been applied. Using SELinux without this patch is not recommended."
Looking at the code I see:
#ifndef _SELINUX_KERNEL_PATCH_
#warning "SELinux: The separate SELinux kernel patch has not been applied. Using SELinux without this patch is not recommended."
#endif
Further down I see:
#ifdef _SELINUX_KERNEL_PATCH_
[...]
#else
printk(KERN_WARNING "SELinux: The separate SELinux kernel patch was not applied. Using SELinux without this patch is not recommended.\n");
[...]
#endif
However, _SELINUX_KERNEL_PATCH_ is only used, and never defined, in this
file.
I have also checked this against Russell's patch, it appears to be the
same.
Have I made a mistake somewhere in patching the kernel, or maybe this
code is obsolete? Or perhaps Russell's patch is not intended to be used
standalone anymore but must be used in conjection with another patch?
What is this "seperate kernel patch"?
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-27 4:23 Brian May
@ 2002-10-28 12:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-28 22:53 ` Brian May
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2002-10-28 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian May; +Cc: SELinux
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Brian May wrote:
> While compiling the kernel, 2.4.19, with the latest lsm-SE Linux
> patches from Russell (I am not sure how to double check this; but it is
> POLICYDB_VERSION 12), I happened to glance at my screen when this was
> displayed:
>
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/bam/tmp/woody/selinux/kernel-image/kernel-image-2.4.19-i386-2.4.19/build-k6/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=k6 -Iinclude -nostdinc -I /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=hooks -c -o hooks.o hooks.c
> hooks.c:66: warning: #warning "SELinux: The separate SELinux kernel patch has not been applied. Using SELinux without this patch is not recommended."
<snip>
> Have I made a mistake somewhere in patching the kernel, or maybe this
> code is obsolete? Or perhaps Russell's patch is not intended to be used
> standalone anymore but must be used in conjection with another patch?
>
> What is this "seperate kernel patch"?
SELinux has always included a separate SELinux-specific kernel patch to be
applied on top of the LSM patch, although the precise purpose of the patch
has varied over time. In the current release, the patch is available in
the SELinux archive in selinux/module/selinux-2.4.patch or directly from
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/patches/selinux-2.4-2002102211.patch.gz. In
the latest release, the dependence of the SELinux module on this patch has
increased due to the elimination of precondition functions. Some of the
changes in this patch may find their way back into the mainstream LSM
patch in a more general form in the future (they have all been discussed
on the LSM mailing list), but some changes are likely to remain
SELinux-specific.
As a side note, please be aware that the lsm-2.4 tree and LSM patch that
is provided on the NSA SELinux web site is also different from the
old 2.4.19-lsm1 snapshot patch from WireX. It is consistent with the head
of the LSM BitKeeper tree, so it includes many changes that have been
committed since that snapshot patch.
--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-28 12:57 ` Stephen Smalley
@ 2002-10-28 22:53 ` Brian May
2002-10-28 23:00 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-29 23:07 ` Brian May
2002-10-30 19:43 ` Kerry Thompson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Brian May @ 2002-10-28 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell Coker; +Cc: SELinux
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:57:06AM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> SELinux has always included a separate SELinux-specific kernel patch to be
> applied on top of the LSM patch, although the precise purpose of the patch
> has varied over time. In the current release, the patch is available in
> the SELinux archive in selinux/module/selinux-2.4.patch or directly from
> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/patches/selinux-2.4-2002102211.patch.gz. In
> the latest release, the dependence of the SELinux module on this patch has
> increased due to the elimination of precondition functions. Some of the
> changes in this patch may find their way back into the mainstream LSM
> patch in a more general form in the future (they have all been discussed
> on the LSM mailing list), but some changes are likely to remain
> SELinux-specific.
>
> As a side note, please be aware that the lsm-2.4 tree and LSM patch that
> is provided on the NSA SELinux web site is also different from the
> old 2.4.19-lsm1 snapshot patch from WireX. It is consistent with the head
> of the LSM BitKeeper tree, so it includes many changes that have been
> committed since that snapshot patch.
Russell,
Do you have any plans to include this patch, which currently appears to
be missing into your Debian package kernel-patch-2.4-lsm?
When I next get the chance I will patch my kernel source image available
online my website with this extra patch.
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-28 22:53 ` Brian May
@ 2002-10-28 23:00 ` Russell Coker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Russell Coker @ 2002-10-28 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian May; +Cc: SELinux
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 23:53, Brian May wrote:
> Do you have any plans to include this patch, which currently appears to
> be missing into your Debian package kernel-patch-2.4-lsm?
>
> When I next get the chance I will patch my kernel source image available
> online my website with this extra patch.
Yes, I'll do it now.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-28 12:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-28 22:53 ` Brian May
@ 2002-10-29 23:07 ` Brian May
2002-10-30 13:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 19:43 ` Kerry Thompson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Brian May @ 2002-10-29 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Smalley; +Cc: SELinux
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:57:06AM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> SELinux has always included a separate SELinux-specific kernel patch to be
> applied on top of the LSM patch, although the precise purpose of the patch
> has varied over time. In the current release, the patch is available in
> the SELinux archive in selinux/module/selinux-2.4.patch or directly from
> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/patches/selinux-2.4-2002102211.patch.gz. In
> the latest release, the dependence of the SELinux module on this patch has
> increased due to the elimination of precondition functions. Some of the
> changes in this patch may find their way back into the mainstream LSM
> patch in a more general form in the future (they have all been discussed
> on the LSM mailing list), but some changes are likely to remain
> SELinux-specific.
It appears that with this patch, it is no longer possible to
compile the patched kernel without SE-LINUX support.
Maybe the call to selinux_init() in main.c needs
to be wrapped with #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX?
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-29 23:07 ` Brian May
@ 2002-10-30 13:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 15:13 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-30 22:03 ` Brian May
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2002-10-30 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian May; +Cc: SELinux
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Brian May wrote:
> It appears that with this patch, it is no longer possible to
> compile the patched kernel without SE-LINUX support.
>
> Maybe the call to selinux_init() in main.c needs
> to be wrapped with #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX?
You would only apply this patch if you intend to use SELinux, so it is
implicit that SELinux is going to be enabled. We could #ifdef it, but I'm
not sure what the point is. Now, if a generalized form of early
initialization is added to the LSM patch, then this would go away and the
SELinux-specific code would be hidden.
--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 13:23 ` Stephen Smalley
@ 2002-10-30 15:13 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-30 19:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 22:03 ` Brian May
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Russell Coker @ 2002-10-30 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Smalley, Brian May; +Cc: SELinux
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:23, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > It appears that with this patch, it is no longer possible to
> > compile the patched kernel without SE-LINUX support.
> >
> > Maybe the call to selinux_init() in main.c needs
> > to be wrapped with #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX?
>
> You would only apply this patch if you intend to use SELinux, so it is
> implicit that SELinux is going to be enabled. We could #ifdef it, but I'm
> not sure what the point is. Now, if a generalized form of early
> initialization is added to the LSM patch, then this would go away and the
> SELinux-specific code would be hidden.
This means that I can't produce a single kernel-patch package that can be used
by SE Linux, LIDS, and DTE users...
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-28 12:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-28 22:53 ` Brian May
2002-10-29 23:07 ` Brian May
@ 2002-10-30 19:43 ` Kerry Thompson
2002-10-30 19:54 ` Stephen Smalley
2 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Kerry Thompson @ 2002-10-30 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SELinux
The 'Everything in one Part' download at
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/archives/lsm-2.4-selinux-2002102211.tgz doesn't
seem to have this patch included, and the NSA site isn't very clear that
the patch is required. Could we please have the patch added to the next
all-in-one snapshot?
Kerry
Stephen Smalley said:
>
> SELinux has always included a separate SELinux-specific kernel patch to
> be applied on top of the LSM patch, although the precise purpose of the
> patch has varied over time. In the current release, the patch is
> available in the SELinux archive in selinux/module/selinux-2.4.patch or
> directly from
> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/patches/selinux-2.4-2002102211.patch.gz. In
> the latest release, the dependence of the SELinux module on this patch
> has increased due to the elimination of precondition functions. Some of
> the changes in this patch may find their way back into the mainstream
> LSM patch in a more general form in the future (they have all been
> discussed on the LSM mailing list), but some changes are likely to
> remain
> SELinux-specific.
--
Kerry Thompson, CCNA CISSP
Information Systems Security Consultant
http://www.crypt.gen.nz kerry@crypt.gen.nz
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 15:13 ` Russell Coker
@ 2002-10-30 19:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 22:08 ` Brian May
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2002-10-30 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell Coker; +Cc: Brian May, SELinux
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> This means that I can't produce a single kernel-patch package that can be used
> by SE Linux, LIDS, and DTE users...
That isn't new; in prior releases, the SELinux-specific patch set the
SELinux option defaults in defconfig and set EXTRAVERSION to -selinux in
the top-level Makefile, so it wasn't appropriate for LIDS or DTE users
anyway. [Are LIDS users now using the LSM kernel patch package, or are
they still using the separate LIDS package? Are there any DTE users?]
For the separate SELinux patch to work for LIDS and DTE users, you would
need to drop those changes as well as #ifdef the initialization call. You
would also need to add stub hook functions for inode_init to the LIDS and
DTE modules.
--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 19:43 ` Kerry Thompson
@ 2002-10-30 19:54 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2002-10-30 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kerry Thompson; +Cc: SELinux
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Kerry Thompson wrote:
> The 'Everything in one Part' download at
> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/archives/lsm-2.4-selinux-2002102211.tgz doesn't
> seem to have this patch included, and the NSA site isn't very clear that
> the patch is required. Could we please have the patch added to the next
> all-in-one snapshot?
The separate SELinux-specific patch is in that archive. If you expand the
archive, you'll find it in selinux/module/selinux-2.4.patch. If you
follow the installation instructions in selinux/README, that patch will be
applied to the lsm-2.4 tree prior to building the kernel. The only change
from the prior release with regard to this issue was that the patch file
was renamed from lsm-2.4.patch to selinux-2.4.patch for clarity and the
set of changes within the patch have increased.
--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.33.0210301642520.22794-100000@raven>
@ 2002-10-30 21:56 ` Russell Coker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Russell Coker @ 2002-10-30 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Smalley; +Cc: selinux
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:45, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > That isn't new; in prior releases, the SELinux-specific patch set the
> > SELinux option defaults in defconfig and set EXTRAVERSION to -selinux in
> > the top-level Makefile, so it wasn't appropriate for LIDS or DTE users
> > anyway.
>
> By the way, the EXTRAVERSION change was requested by you a year ago
> (distribution of kernel patches thread on the selinux list). But I get
Correct. However unofficial Debian policy regarding kernel patches changed
after that time and I reluctantly changed my packages to match.
> the impression that you've been dropping the Makefile and defconfig
> changes from your kernel patch packages (not sure whether you have been
> including the netsyms.c changes, those are needed for building Selopt as a
> module, and are #ifdef'd appropriately).
I've just built a new kernel-patch package with this. I'll upload it now.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 13:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 15:13 ` Russell Coker
@ 2002-10-30 22:03 ` Brian May
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Brian May @ 2002-10-30 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Smalley; +Cc: SELinux
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 08:23:58AM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> You would only apply this patch if you intend to use SELinux, so it is
> implicit that SELinux is going to be enabled. We could #ifdef it, but I'm
I find it considerably easier to maintain my kernel sources, if I only
need to maintain one kernel source tree for all systems.
This means I don't have the situation in several months time "I have to
compile this 3rd party closed source driver[1], but I can't remember how
I created the original kernel source." (This did happen to me recently
too, I thought I had the kernel tree safe, but I must have accidently
modified it somehow...) In comparision, keeping track of the config
files is very easy, Debian kernel packages do this automatically.
So I use the same kernel source now for all my systems. It has been
patched with not only SE-Linux, but also ISDN DOV[2], ISDN Voice, and
Freeswan. Sometime in the future I may also investigate adding the
EVMS patch (assuming it doesn't conflict in any way with any of the
other patches).
This doesn't mean that I want to use all of these features on all
systems (for instance I am not ready to install SE-Linux on all my
systems just yet), it just makes it easier to maintain.
So for now, I have patched my kernel source to make that init
call optional.
Another option I might consider is creating a extremely simply policy,
maybe with only one domain and give that domain access to everything.
That way I can install SE-Linux kernels on computers where I am not yet
ready to install a full blown SE-Linux policy, but at the same time not
flood the console with lots of warnings, or risk DOS attacks.
Notes:
[1] Unfortunately, sometimes as much as we all hate to use closed
source drivers, it is the only choice, for instance with
a certain brand (or maybe even any brand) of satellite cards.
[2] The DOV patch will be obsolete as of 2.4.20, it has been intergrated
into the main kernel.
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 19:48 ` Stephen Smalley
@ 2002-10-30 22:08 ` Brian May
2002-10-30 22:21 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 22:22 ` Russell Coker
0 siblings, 2 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Brian May @ 2002-10-30 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Smalley; +Cc: Russell Coker, SELinux
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:48:12PM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> For the separate SELinux patch to work for LIDS and DTE users, you would
> need to drop those changes as well as #ifdef the initialization call. You
> would also need to add stub hook functions for inode_init to the LIDS and
> DTE modules.
What parts of the seperate SELinux patch would break LIDS and DTE users?
--
Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 22:08 ` Brian May
@ 2002-10-30 22:21 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 22:22 ` Russell Coker
1 sibling, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2002-10-30 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian May; +Cc: Russell Coker, SELinux
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Brian May wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:48:12PM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > For the separate SELinux patch to work for LIDS and DTE users, you would
> > need to drop those changes as well as #ifdef the initialization call. You
> > would also need to add stub hook functions for inode_init to the LIDS and
> > DTE modules.
>
> What parts of the seperate SELinux patch would break LIDS and DTE users?
As I said, you would need to drop the Makefile and defconfig diffs
entirely, wrap the init/main.c diff with an #ifdef, and add inode_init
stub hook functions to LIDS and DTE. I don't plan on dropping the
Makefile and defconfig diffs from our patch, but I'm willing to fix up the
other issues in our patch.
--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 22:08 ` Brian May
2002-10-30 22:21 ` Stephen Smalley
@ 2002-10-30 22:22 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-30 22:49 ` Stephen Smalley
1 sibling, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Russell Coker @ 2002-10-30 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian May, Stephen Smalley; +Cc: SELinux
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:08, Brian May wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:48:12PM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > For the separate SELinux patch to work for LIDS and DTE users, you would
> > need to drop those changes as well as #ifdef the initialization call.
> > You would also need to add stub hook functions for inode_init to the LIDS
> > and DTE modules.
>
> What parts of the seperate SELinux patch would break LIDS and DTE users?
I'm not sure. It was my understanding of the conversation between you and
Steve that some parts of SE Linux will be unconditionally enabled if you
apply the second patch. So in my latest kernel patch package I put a bunch
of extra #ifdef's in...
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: kernel warning
2002-10-30 22:22 ` Russell Coker
@ 2002-10-30 22:49 ` Stephen Smalley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Smalley @ 2002-10-30 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell Coker; +Cc: Brian May, SELinux
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> I'm not sure. It was my understanding of the conversation between you and
> Steve that some parts of SE Linux will be unconditionally enabled if you
> apply the second patch. So in my latest kernel patch package I put a bunch
> of extra #ifdef's in...
Yes, this works. An alternative to #ifdef'ing the inode_init hook is to
simply add trivial stub foo_inode_init hook functions to the DTE and LIDS
modules, like the other hooks that are not truly used by those modules.
--
Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
ssmalley@nai.com
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Kernel Warning
2011-08-25 18:26 linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree H. Peter Anvin
@ 2011-08-25 19:31 ` Carsten Schiers
2011-08-25 19:39 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Schiers @ 2011-08-25 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xen-devel
Is that a Xen thing that anybody's interested in?
BR,
Carsten.
[ 0.011657] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.011734] WARNING: at arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:729
init_hw_perf_events+0x337/0x3d7()
[ 0.011834] Hardware name: M56S-S3
[ 0.011908] Modules linked in:
[ 0.012000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32.44-xen-amd64 #6
[ 0.012000] Call Trace:
[ 0.012000] [<ffffffff8104d70f>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x76/0x8c
[ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814e216e>] ? init_hw_perf_events+0x337/0x3d7
[ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814e1c7b>] ? identify_boot_cpu+0x15/0x3d
[ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814e1e12>] ? check_bugs+0x9/0x2e
[ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814dace3>] ? start_kernel+0x3cb/0x3e5
[ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814dcba9>] ? xen_start_kernel+0x5e1/0x5e7
[ 0.012000] ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel Warning
2011-08-25 19:31 ` Kernel Warning Carsten Schiers
@ 2011-08-25 19:39 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-25 22:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2011-08-25 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Schiers; +Cc: Xen-devel
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 20:31 +0100, Carsten Schiers wrote:
> Is that a Xen thing that anybody's interested in?
It's a harmless warning but it gets reported a lot and it taints the
kernel which causes some confusion is there is subsequently another
error. I proposed toning it down a bit a couple of days ago:
http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=131400621622691
Ian.
>
> BR,
> Carsten.
>
> [ 0.011657] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.011734] WARNING: at arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:729
> init_hw_perf_events+0x337/0x3d7()
> [ 0.011834] Hardware name: M56S-S3
> [ 0.011908] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.012000] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32.44-xen-amd64 #6
> [ 0.012000] Call Trace:
> [ 0.012000] [<ffffffff8104d70f>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x76/0x8c
> [ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814e216e>] ? init_hw_perf_events+0x337/0x3d7
> [ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814e1c7b>] ? identify_boot_cpu+0x15/0x3d
> [ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814e1e12>] ? check_bugs+0x9/0x2e
> [ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814dace3>] ? start_kernel+0x3cb/0x3e5
> [ 0.012000] [<ffffffff814dcba9>] ? xen_start_kernel+0x5e1/0x5e7
> [ 0.012000] ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel Warning
2011-08-25 19:39 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2011-08-25 22:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2011-08-25 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: Xen-devel, Carsten Schiers
On 08/25/2011 12:39 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 20:31 +0100, Carsten Schiers wrote:
>> Is that a Xen thing that anybody's interested in?
> It's a harmless warning but it gets reported a lot and it taints the
> kernel which causes some confusion is there is subsequently another
> error. I proposed toning it down a bit a couple of days ago:
> http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=131400621622691
I'd tend towards just silently eating APIC writes, unless we want to go
through and try to silence each one at the source.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-25 22:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-09 15:29 kernel warning Robert Singleton
2002-05-09 17:24 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-27 4:23 Brian May
2002-10-28 12:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-28 22:53 ` Brian May
2002-10-28 23:00 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-29 23:07 ` Brian May
2002-10-30 13:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 15:13 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-30 19:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 22:08 ` Brian May
2002-10-30 22:21 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 22:22 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-30 22:49 ` Stephen Smalley
2002-10-30 22:03 ` Brian May
2002-10-30 19:43 ` Kerry Thompson
2002-10-30 19:54 ` Stephen Smalley
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.33.0210301642520.22794-100000@raven>
2002-10-30 21:56 ` Russell Coker
2011-08-25 18:26 linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-25 19:31 ` Kernel Warning Carsten Schiers
2011-08-25 19:39 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-25 22:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.