* [linux-lvm] Re: linux-lvm digest, Vol 1 #624 - 8 msgs
[not found] <E17Q3FS-0002v2-00@hermes.sistina.com>
@ 2002-07-04 10:12 ` James B. Byrne
2002-07-05 5:02 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: James B. Byrne @ 2002-07-04 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On 4 Jul 2002 at 4:49, "Heinz J . Mauelshagen"
<mauelshagen@sistina.com> wrote:
> Did you just grow the LV?
>
Yes
> You need to extend the FS using the respective FS resizing tool as
> well (resize2fs, resize_reiserfs, ...).
>
Did that too.
> BTW: for ext2 the e2fsadm(8) command, which comes with LVM does both
> for you.
>
>
I tried this originally but I can't remember if it worked first off or if in
my ignorance I ran it out of sequence, had problems, and ended up
doing something else. In any case eventually I managed to get the
file system up to 350 Mb.
> This doesn't really explain the local/remote difference unless:
>
> - local users had root credentials avoiding the fs
> "reserved block count" to matter
As it turned out the local user did have root capability but when su to
a non-privileged user the local file transfers also worked.
>
> - files uploaded where very large compared to the locally stored files
The reverse in fact, the local files moved in for testing averaged 10x
the size of normal ftp uploads. However, the culprit was discovered
and it wasn't lvm. The problem appears to have been a simple
permission problem in the directory tree for the ftp chroot. Why
pureftpd chose to report this as a disk full error is beyond me.
However, it is worth noting that rebooting the system, without
making any other changes, caused pureftp to subsequently report a
different error message for the same activity. The message didn't
actually say access forbidden ( I think that it was more like "non
existent file", but with the application of a little intuition it did point to
a permissions problem.
Regards,
Jim
--- e-mail is NOT a secure channel
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Re: linux-lvm digest, Vol 1 #624 - 8 msgs
2002-07-04 10:12 ` [linux-lvm] Re: linux-lvm digest, Vol 1 #624 - 8 msgs James B. Byrne
@ 2002-07-05 5:02 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J . Mauelshagen @ 2002-07-05 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
James,
good to hear that it works for you now.
Cheers,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:11:49AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On 4 Jul 2002 at 4:49, "Heinz J . Mauelshagen"
> <mauelshagen@sistina.com> wrote:
>
> > Did you just grow the LV?
> >
>
> Yes
>
> > You need to extend the FS using the respective FS resizing tool as
> > well (resize2fs, resize_reiserfs, ...).
> >
>
> Did that too.
>
> > BTW: for ext2 the e2fsadm(8) command, which comes with LVM does both
> > for you.
> >
> >
>
> I tried this originally but I can't remember if it worked first off or if in
> my ignorance I ran it out of sequence, had problems, and ended up
> doing something else. In any case eventually I managed to get the
> file system up to 350 Mb.
>
> > This doesn't really explain the local/remote difference unless:
> >
> > - local users had root credentials avoiding the fs
> > "reserved block count" to matter
>
> As it turned out the local user did have root capability but when su to
> a non-privileged user the local file transfers also worked.
> >
> > - files uploaded where very large compared to the locally stored files
>
> The reverse in fact, the local files moved in for testing averaged 10x
> the size of normal ftp uploads. However, the culprit was discovered
> and it wasn't lvm. The problem appears to have been a simple
> permission problem in the directory tree for the ftp chroot. Why
> pureftpd chose to report this as a disk full error is beyond me.
>
> However, it is worth noting that rebooting the system, without
> making any other changes, caused pureftp to subsequently report a
> different error message for the same activity. The message didn't
> actually say access forbidden ( I think that it was more like "non
> existent file", but with the application of a little intuition it did point to
> a permissions problem.
>
> Regards,
> Jim
>
>
> --- e-mail is NOT a secure channel
> James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca
> Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
> 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
> Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
> Canada L8E 3C3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-05 5:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E17Q3FS-0002v2-00@hermes.sistina.com>
2002-07-04 10:12 ` [linux-lvm] Re: linux-lvm digest, Vol 1 #624 - 8 msgs James B. Byrne
2002-07-05 5:02 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.