All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: NetBIOS browsing across subnets
@ 2002-07-05  1:49 George Vieira
  2002-07-05  3:21 ` Michael
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: George Vieira @ 2002-07-05  1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Michael', netfilter

I'm sorry but NFS is no way a solution for this.. I've seen crashes on NFS
servers before many times and also when one server has a problem then the
other server goes into a panic attack.. sometimes even goes into 100%CPU as
I've seen before.. yes upgrade NFS if youmust but I still say samba as
master browser is the way to go as this works perfectly on my VPN
server/firewall without a hitch..

thanks,
George Vieira
Systems Manager
Citadel Computer Systems P/L
http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael [mailto:mutk@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Friday, 05 July 2002 12:43 PM
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: NetBIOS browsing across subnets


There generally isn't a way to do it. NetBIOS is feeble, and non 
routeable...

One way around it, and it doesn't involve NetBIOS/samba on the firewall:

You need two Samba servers, one on each subnet. Export the filesystem to 
be shared from one Samba server to the other. This means that the 
firewall only has to allow NFS traffic from one SMB to the other. This 
way you don't compromise the firewall machine.. only the Samba servers 
by running NFS...



Cheers,
Michael

>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ron Gedye [mailto:rgedye@teleformix.com]
>Sent: Friday, 05 July 2002 10:38 AM
>To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
>Subject: Re: NetBIOS browsing across subnets
>
>
>On Thursday 04 July 2002 15 46 r, you wrote:
>
>>If anyone knows a way of supporting Windows browsing across a router,
>>please speak up :-)
>>




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: NetBIOS browsing across subnets
@ 2002-07-05  2:30 George Vieira
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: George Vieira @ 2002-07-05  2:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: netfilter

OMG..What the..

so much trouble.. wasn't the original problem that they wanted to see each
others machine/shares off NN? I'm getting off track now and confused...

You don't need smbmount on the firewall.. it's just there to handle the
broadcast of machines on both networks and broadcasts to both networks like
a *yes* proxy server for Netbios.. BUT it must be the master browser.. 1
machine 1 solution, not 2 and transfering this and that,etc.. *shudders*...

thanks,
George Vieira
Systems Manager
Citadel Computer Systems P/L
http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael [mailto:mutk@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Friday, 05 July 2002 1:22 PM
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: NetBIOS browsing across subnets


Yes, I did say you compromise the Samba servers by doing this.....

I have had similar problems, and most were fixed with upgrade NFS... 
Also, having filesystems mounted on demand and unmount at idle has 
minimised problems.

Ok, NFS will in future be *the* solution. Just that having Samba running 
on a firewall machine is erksome for many reasons..

Another solution, to avoid Samba on the firewall system having to write 
and read from the Host's filesystem is to yes, have Samba running on the 
firewall, but have a Samba server on each subnet.

Then just have the firewall host smbmount the two subnet's Samba 
server's shared filesystems. The firewall host then advertises the 
shared filesystem from one subnet on the other subnet..

BTW is there any such hing as a NetBIOS proxy server?? This will be ideal.

Cheers,
Michael

George Vieira wrote:

>I'm sorry but NFS is no way a solution for this.. I've seen crashes on NFS
>servers before many times and also when one server has a problem then the
>other server goes into a panic attack.. sometimes even goes into 100%CPU as
>I've seen before.. yes upgrade NFS if youmust but I still say samba as
>master browser is the way to go as this works perfectly on my VPN
>server/firewall without a hitch..
>
>thanks,
>George Vieira
>Systems Manager
>Citadel Computer Systems P/L
>http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au
>




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: NetBIOS browsing across subnets
@ 2002-07-05  0:48 George Vieira
  2002-07-05  2:42 ` Michael
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: George Vieira @ 2002-07-05  0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Ron Gedye', netfilter

WINS will not help.. it's just to help resolution og hostnames.. but he
wants to see them in Network Neighbourhood and WINS won't do this..
It'll have to be Samba on the firewall with remote announcements like this:

remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.255

thanks,
George Vieira
Systems Manager
Citadel Computer Systems P/L
http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au



-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Gedye [mailto:rgedye@teleformix.com]
Sent: Friday, 05 July 2002 10:38 AM
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: NetBIOS browsing across subnets


On Thursday 04 July 2002 15 46 r, you wrote:

>
> If anyone knows a way of supporting Windows browsing across a router,
> please speak up :-)
>

Netbios will not pass a router.  The only way to allow this type of browsing

is to use a WINS Server.  There is a way to set up either a push or pull 
mechanism to share info between different netbios 'zones'. (although it's 
been a few years since I had no other choice than windows networking and 
don't remember the specifics)

Ron


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: NetBIOS browsing across subnets
@ 2002-07-04 22:51 George Vieira
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: George Vieira @ 2002-07-04 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Best put a Samba server on the firewall and broadcast to both networks using
the `remote announce =` option..
Make this machine the master browser for both networks and you should be
fine, I do with with VPN users and it works like a dream until you put a PDC
into the network which continously complains and wants to be the master.. he
he.. linux beats it hands down on every election..

thanks,
George Vieira
Systems Manager
Citadel Computer Systems P/L
http://www.citadelcomputer.com.au



-----Original Message-----
From: Antony Stone [mailto:Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, 05 July 2002 6:46 AM
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: NetBIOS browsing across subnets


On Thursday 04 July 2002 9:44 pm, John Jones wrote:

> I have a need to allow NetBIOS/Network Neighborhood browsing across a
> firewall between one internal LAN segment (192.168.0.0/23) to another
> (192.168.10.0/24).  The two networks are on interfaces eth2 and eth3,
> respectively, off of the corporate firewall.

As far as I am aware you cannot do Network Neighbourhood browsing across a 
router - it works by using broadcast packets, so unless you bridge your 
networks together you will not be able to browse one side from the other.

You can certainly make Windows / SMB / NetBios connections from one network 
to another, but only if you know in advance the IP address/es of the 
machine/s you want to connect to.

If anyone knows a way of supporting Windows browsing across a router, please

speak up :-)

 

Antony.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* NetBIOS browsing across subnets
@ 2002-07-04 20:44 John Jones
  2002-07-04 20:46 ` Antony Stone
  2002-07-05 18:34 ` Nathan Cassano
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: John Jones @ 2002-07-04 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

I have a need to allow NetBIOS/Network Neighborhood browsing across a
firewall between one internal LAN segment (192.168.0.0/23) to another
(192.168.10.0/24).  The two networks are on interfaces eth2 and eth3,
respectively, off of the corporate firewall.

The two segments of the LAN were seperated due to broadcast flooding
during video streaming development work by a dev team.

I have the majority of the instructions down, I *think*:

   iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING 1 -i eth2 -p tcp -d 192.168.0.1 --dport
139 -j DNAT --to 192.168.10.1:139
   iptables -I FORWARD 6 -i eth2 -o eth3 -p tcp -d 192.168.10.1 --dport
139 -j ACCEPT

   iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING 1 -i eth3 -p tcp -d 192.168.10.1
--dport 139 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.1:139
   iptables -I FORWARD 6 -i eth2 -o eth2 -p tcp -d 192.168.0.1 --dport
139 -j ACCEPT

Not sure if this should be Destination NAT or Source NAT.  I would like
advice and/or corrections from anyone out there that has a better
knowledge of this, first.

Thanks in advance.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-05 19:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-05  1:49 NetBIOS browsing across subnets George Vieira
2002-07-05  3:21 ` Michael
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-05  2:30 George Vieira
2002-07-05  0:48 George Vieira
2002-07-05  2:42 ` Michael
2002-07-04 22:51 George Vieira
2002-07-04 20:44 John Jones
2002-07-04 20:46 ` Antony Stone
2002-07-04 21:52   ` Stewart Thompson
2002-07-05  0:37   ` Ron Gedye
2002-07-05 18:34 ` Nathan Cassano
2002-07-05 18:40   ` Adam D. Barratt
2002-07-05 19:15     ` Antony Stone

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.