All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* hi guys passive firewall
@ 2002-07-07  3:20 Remo Mattei
  2002-07-07  8:06 ` Antony Stone
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Remo Mattei @ 2002-07-07  3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

HI guys just a quick check with any of you. 
I have an office with 64 ips which are all valid. I have some server 
that do not need any security enable. But I do have other that I will 
have to firewall down any suggestions? Will all rules come in into the 
input chains and then forward all other packages work.

THANKS, any suggestions are appreciated.

REMO



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: hi guys passive firewall
  2002-07-07  3:20 hi guys passive firewall Remo Mattei
@ 2002-07-07  8:06 ` Antony Stone
  2002-07-07 15:26   ` Remo Mattei
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2002-07-07  8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

On Sunday 07 July 2002 4:20 am, Remo Mattei wrote:

> I have an office with 64 ips which are all valid. I have some server
> that do not need any security enable.

Oh yeah ?   What kind of servers are those, then ?   How come they're not 
vulnerable to anything and therefore don't need any security :-) ?

> But I do have other that I will
> have to firewall down any suggestions? Will all rules come in into the
> input chains and then forward all other packages work.

Depends whether you're talking about putting netfilter onto the server itself 
(in which case you filter the INPUT chain), or whether netfilter is on a 
router between the servers and the Internet (in which case you filter the 
FORWARD chain).

 

Antony.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: hi guys passive firewall
  2002-07-07 15:26   ` Remo Mattei
@ 2002-07-07 15:21     ` Antony Stone
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Antony Stone @ 2002-07-07 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

On Sunday 07 July 2002 4:26 pm, Remo Mattei wrote:

> Antony Stone wrote:

> > Depends whether you're talking about putting netfilter onto the server
> > itself (in which case you filter the INPUT chain), or whether netfilter
> > is on a router between the servers and the Internet (in which case you
> > filter the FORWARD chain).
>
> So I guess since the anwser is above I just will use the forward and let
> everything pass in the input.

It sounds to me as though you are uncertain about how packets pass through a 
netfilter firewall.

Packets addressed to the firewall itself go through the INPUT chain.

Packets being routed from a machine on one side of the firewall to a machine 
on the other go through the FORWARD chain.

Packets originating on the firewall itself go through the OUTPUT chain.

No single packet will ever go through both the INPUT and the FORWARD chains, 
or the FORWARD and the OUTPUT chains.

 

Antony.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: hi guys passive firewall
  2002-07-07  8:06 ` Antony Stone
@ 2002-07-07 15:26   ` Remo Mattei
  2002-07-07 15:21     ` Antony Stone
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Remo Mattei @ 2002-07-07 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Antony Stone, netfilter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1006 bytes --]



Antony Stone wrote:

>On Sunday 07 July 2002 4:20 am, Remo Mattei wrote:
>
>>I have an office with 64 ips which are all valid. I have some server
>>that do not need any security enable.
>>

>
>Oh yeah ?   What kind of servers are those, then ?   How come they're not 
>vulnerable to anything and therefore don't need any security :-) ?
>
I guess I should say that the server itself have a firewall not that do 
not need any security on them!!!

>
>>But I do have other that I will
>>have to firewall down any suggestions? Will all rules come in into the
>>input chains and then forward all other packages work.
>>
>
>Depends whether you're talking about putting netfilter onto the server itself 
>(in which case you filter the INPUT chain), or whether netfilter is on a 
>router between the servers and the Internet (in which case you filter the 
>FORWARD chain).
>
So I guess since the anwser is above I just will use the forward and let 
everything pass in the input.

Thanks anthony

> 
>
>Antony.
>


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1945 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-07 15:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-07  3:20 hi guys passive firewall Remo Mattei
2002-07-07  8:06 ` Antony Stone
2002-07-07 15:26   ` Remo Mattei
2002-07-07 15:21     ` Antony Stone

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.