* success with atomic kmap patches
@ 2002-07-19 2:15 Dave Hansen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2002-07-19 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, Martin J. Bligh
I was using a little script to warm up my file cache for Specweb runs
when Martin Bligh said that it might be a good test of your kmap
patches. I ran 8 greps in parallel (1-per-cpu) through a 10-gigabyte
Specweb file set which is on a RAID array. The RAID is how I can do a
cold run in 3 minutes 30 sec :). Each grep works on a disjoint set of
data.
Here's a run with the cache already warm:
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrepwarm-2.5.26+lm+kmapfun-07-18-2002-18.24.38/
You'll probably only care about greptime.total, and lockstat. The
network stuff is cruft from when I actually run Specweb.
Here's a cold cache run:
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-cold-2.5.26+lm+kmapfun-07-18-2002-18.25.55/
Here are warm and cold, without the kmap patches
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-cold-2.5.26+lm-07-18-2002-18.46.27/
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-warm-2.5.26+lm-07-18-2002-18.56.09/
I would give you oprofile data, but it appears that NMIs wreak havoc
on a certain vendor's hardware. When oprofile is compiled in, my box
gets quite unstable.
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-07-19 2:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-19 2:15 success with atomic kmap patches Dave Hansen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.