All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* data-logging time comparison
@ 2002-08-01 23:24 Manuel Krause
  2002-08-02 18:32 ` Manuel Krause
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Krause @ 2002-08-01 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Mason; +Cc: reiserfs-list

Hi!

Maybe you are interested in my recent backup time comparison. I simply 
copied the partitions with "cp -ax /.../a/. /.../b/" where "/.../b/" is 
a freshly created reiserfs. I hope the comparison is readable and makes 
sense for someone.

I'm not really glad with the first values of the "living" root 
filesystem, partition 1. Did I forget something (except for taking 
data=journal values, sorry) ?


Best regards,

Manuel


Timings:
--------
partition 1: /dev/hdd7  2722896  1929600   793296  71% /mnt/alpha
  (is my / filesystem)

used FS mounted noatime,notail
  real  6m53.929s  user  0m1.250s  sys  0m50.310s  ~4,552MB/s    48%
used FS mounted noatime,notail,data=ordered
  real 12m3.885s   user  0m1.520s  sys  0m49.900s  ~2,603MB/s    27%
new FS mounted noatime,notail
  real  3m18.826s  user  0m1.310s  sys  0m49.710s  ~9,478MB/s  =100%
new FS mounted noatime,notail,data=ordered
  real  4m6.866s   user  0m1.620s  sys  0m50.120s  ~7,633MB/s    81%


partition 2: /dev/hdd11 5550248  4738084   812164  86% /mnt/beta
  (is my software "repository")

used FS mounted noatime,notail
  real  9m21.212s  user  0m1.480s  sys  1m42.160s  ~8,245MB/s    99,9%
used FS mounted noatime,notail,data=ordered
  real 12m38.088s  user  0m1.780s  sys  1m38.100s  ~6,104MB/s    74%
new FS mounted noatime,notail
  real  9m20.956s   user  0m1.680s  sys  1m39.190s  ~8,248MB/s  =100%
new FS mounted noatime,notail,data=ordered
  real  11m54.513s user  0m1.910s  sys  1m38.460s  ~6,476MB/s    79%



Setup:
------
2.4.19-rc3
+ reiserfs-pending: 01.change_help_wording.diff
                     02.change_menu_wording.diff
                     03.confusing_journal_replay_warning_removal.diff
                     05.hash_on_empty_fs-1.diff
+ mason: 01-relocation-4.diff
          02-commit_super-8-relocation.diff
          03-data-logging-23.diff
          04-write_times.diff
          05-search_reada-4.diff
+ rml: preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-rc2-1.patch




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: data-logging time comparison
  2002-08-01 23:24 data-logging time comparison Manuel Krause
@ 2002-08-02 18:32 ` Manuel Krause
  2002-08-02 18:34   ` Hans Reiser
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Manuel Krause @ 2002-08-02 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Mason; +Cc: reiserfs-list

On 08/02/2002 01:24 AM, Manuel Krause wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Maybe you are interested in my recent backup time comparison. I simply 
> copied the partitions with "cp -ax /.../a/. /.../b/" where "/.../b/" is 
> a freshly created reiserfs. I hope the comparison is readable and makes 
> sense for someone.
> 

O.k.

I made a new comparison with just the data-logging patch replaced by the 
new -24, and now, only using fresh filesystems. I added the related 
lines from tonight to show the improvement.

File size distribution statistics are available via email upon request 
(131kB as .tar.gz).

Best wishes,

Manuel


partition 1: /dev/hdd7   2722896   1925876    797020  71% /mnt/alpha
  (is my / filesystem)

new FS noatime,notail,data=writeback
  real  3m11.881s  user  0m1.600s  sys  0m49.040s   ~9,802MB/s  =100%
new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered
  real  3m19.895s  user  0m1.400s  sys  0m49.890s   ~9,409MB/s    96%
new FS noatime,notail,data=journal
  real  6m48.534s  user  0m1.570s  sys  1m0.830s    ~4,604MB/s    47%
new FS noatime,notail "data-logging-23"
  (real  3m18.826s user  0m1.310s  sys  0m49.710s)  ~9,478MB/s    97%
new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered "data-logging-23"
  (real  4m6.866s  user  0m1.620s  sys  0m50.120s)  ~7,633MB/s    78%



partition 2: /dev/hdd11  5550248   4490128   1060120  81% /mnt/alpha
  (is my software "repository")

new FS noatime,notail,data=writeback
  real  8m46.739s  user  0m1.430s sys   1m32.110s   ~8,325MB/s  =100%
new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered
  real  8m56.040s  user  0m1.410s  sys  1m27.920s   ~8,180MB/s    98%
new FS noatime,notail,data=journal
  real 18m36.456s  user  0m1.750s  sys  1m58.480s   ~3,928MB/s    47%
new FS noatime,notail partition 86% full, "data-logging-23"
  (real  9m20.956s user  0m1.680s  sys  1m39.190s)  ~8,248MB/s    99%
new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered part. 86% full, "data-logging-23"
  (real 11m54.513s user  0m1.910s  sys  1m38.460s)  ~6,476MB/s    78%


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: data-logging time comparison
  2002-08-02 18:32 ` Manuel Krause
@ 2002-08-02 18:34   ` Hans Reiser
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2002-08-02 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manuel Krause; +Cc: Chris Mason, reiserfs-list

These results suggest that data=ordered should indeed be the default. 
 Good job Chris!

Hans

Manuel Krause wrote:

> On 08/02/2002 01:24 AM, Manuel Krause wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Maybe you are interested in my recent backup time comparison. I 
>> simply copied the partitions with "cp -ax /.../a/. /.../b/" where 
>> "/.../b/" is a freshly created reiserfs. I hope the comparison is 
>> readable and makes sense for someone.
>>
>
> O.k.
>
> I made a new comparison with just the data-logging patch replaced by 
> the new -24, and now, only using fresh filesystems. I added the 
> related lines from tonight to show the improvement.
>
> File size distribution statistics are available via email upon request 
> (131kB as .tar.gz).
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Manuel
>
>
> partition 1: /dev/hdd7   2722896   1925876    797020  71% /mnt/alpha
>  (is my / filesystem)
>
> new FS noatime,notail,data=writeback
>  real  3m11.881s  user  0m1.600s  sys  0m49.040s   ~9,802MB/s  =100%
> new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered
>  real  3m19.895s  user  0m1.400s  sys  0m49.890s   ~9,409MB/s    96%
> new FS noatime,notail,data=journal
>  real  6m48.534s  user  0m1.570s  sys  1m0.830s    ~4,604MB/s    47%
> new FS noatime,notail "data-logging-23"
>  (real  3m18.826s user  0m1.310s  sys  0m49.710s)  ~9,478MB/s    97%
> new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered "data-logging-23"
>  (real  4m6.866s  user  0m1.620s  sys  0m50.120s)  ~7,633MB/s    78%
>
>
>
> partition 2: /dev/hdd11  5550248   4490128   1060120  81% /mnt/alpha
>  (is my software "repository")
>
> new FS noatime,notail,data=writeback
>  real  8m46.739s  user  0m1.430s sys   1m32.110s   ~8,325MB/s  =100%
> new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered
>  real  8m56.040s  user  0m1.410s  sys  1m27.920s   ~8,180MB/s    98%
> new FS noatime,notail,data=journal
>  real 18m36.456s  user  0m1.750s  sys  1m58.480s   ~3,928MB/s    47%
> new FS noatime,notail partition 86% full, "data-logging-23"
>  (real  9m20.956s user  0m1.680s  sys  1m39.190s)  ~8,248MB/s    99%
> new FS noatime,notail,data=ordered part. 86% full, "data-logging-23"
>  (real 11m54.513s user  0m1.910s  sys  1m38.460s)  ~6,476MB/s    78%
>
>
>


-- 
Hans




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-02 18:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-01 23:24 data-logging time comparison Manuel Krause
2002-08-02 18:32 ` Manuel Krause
2002-08-02 18:34   ` Hans Reiser

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.