From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 00:38:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D56147E.15E7A98@zip.com.au> (raw)
include/linux/prefetch.h does a strange thing: if the arch doesn't have
the prefectch functions, this header defines no-op version of them and
then defines ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH. So there's no way for mainline code to
know if the architecture *really* has prefetch instructions.
This information loss is unfortunate. Examples:
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
prefetch(foo[i]);
Problem is, if `prefetch' is a no-op, the compiler will still
generate an empty busy-wait loop. Which it must do. We need to
know the truth about ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH to correctly elide that loop.
#ifdef ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH
#define prefetch_prev_lru_page(_page, _base, _field) \
do { \
if ((_page)->lru.prev != _base) { \
struct page *prev; \
\
prev = list_entry(_page->lru.prev, \
struct page, lru); \
prefetch(&prev->_field); \
} \
} while (0)
#else
#define prefetch_prev_lru_page(_page, _base, _field) do { } while (0)
#endif
Which needs a working ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH to avoid probable extra code
generation on CPUs which don't have prefetch.
prefetch.h | 3 ---
1 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
--- 2.5.31/include/linux/prefetch.h~arch_has_prefetchw Sun Aug 11 00:20:08 2002
+++ 2.5.31-akpm/include/linux/prefetch.h Sun Aug 11 00:20:08 2002
@@ -39,17 +39,14 @@
*/
#ifndef ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH
-#define ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH
static inline void prefetch(const void *x) {;}
#endif
#ifndef ARCH_HAS_PREFETCHW
-#define ARCH_HAS_PREFETCHW
static inline void prefetchw(const void *x) {;}
#endif
#ifndef ARCH_HAS_SPINLOCK_PREFETCH
-#define ARCH_HAS_SPINLOCK_PREFETCH
#define spin_lock_prefetch(x) prefetchw(x)
#endif
.
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-11 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-11 7:38 Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-08-11 19:49 ` [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH Alan Cox
2002-08-11 18:47 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-11 18:46 ` Larry McVoy
2002-08-11 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-11 20:07 ` GCC still keeps empty loops? (was: [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH) Jamie Lokier
2002-08-12 7:45 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-08-13 21:42 ` [patch 4/21] fix ARCH_HAS_PREFETCH Adrian Bunk
2002-08-13 22:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-13 22:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-08-13 22:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-14 17:40 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-08-14 19:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-14 19:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-14 22:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-14 20:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-14 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-14 21:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-14 21:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-15 1:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-15 1:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-08-15 1:37 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-14 22:53 ` David Lang
2002-08-14 23:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-08-15 6:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-08-15 6:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] <3D56147E.15E7A98@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-08-11 9:53 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D56147E.15E7A98@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.