All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 2.5 IDE Whitepaper?
@ 2002-08-21 18:38 PAUL BENNETT
  2002-08-21 23:32 ` Jeff Garzik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: PAUL BENNETT @ 2002-08-21 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: paul.bennett

I am looking for documentation regarding the 2.5 IDE rewrite.  For example: 
What are the goals for 2.5.  What is the implementation plan?  What were the
problems in 2.4, and how will they be fixed in 2.5, etc?

Thanks.

-- Paul



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.5 IDE Whitepaper?
  2002-08-21 18:38 2.5 IDE Whitepaper? PAUL BENNETT
@ 2002-08-21 23:32 ` Jeff Garzik
  2002-08-21 23:51   ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2002-08-21 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: PAUL BENNETT; +Cc: linux-kernel

PAUL BENNETT wrote:
> I am looking for documentation regarding the 2.5 IDE rewrite.  For example: 
> What are the goals for 2.5.  What is the implementation plan?  What were the
> problems in 2.4, and how will they be fixed in 2.5, etc?

<chuckle>  I wish :)

I imagine it will happen like most things happen, Linus describes his 
ideas and goals and wishes in a few lkml posts, and eventually something 
like it happens :)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.5 IDE Whitepaper?
  2002-08-21 23:32 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2002-08-21 23:51   ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-08-21 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: PAUL BENNETT, linux-kernel

On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 00:32, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> PAUL BENNETT wrote:
> > I am looking for documentation regarding the 2.5 IDE rewrite.  For example: 
> > What are the goals for 2.5.  What is the implementation plan?  What were the
> > problems in 2.4, and how will they be fixed in 2.5, etc?
> 
> <chuckle>  I wish :)
> 
> I imagine it will happen like most things happen, Linus describes his 
> ideas and goals and wishes in a few lkml posts, and eventually something 
> like it happens :)

I can try, my working list approximates this (ignoring the 2.5
porting/block I/O stuff which is a chapter in itself)

Phase #1 (mostly complete)
	Merge Andre's current code [DONE]
	Remove all the bogus code from the PCI drivers [90% DONE]
	Move all the drivers seperate from the core code [DONE]
	Migrate the PCI drivers to a registration API and allow insmod
	Fix bugs arising from the first bits of phase 1

Phase #2 
	Deal with insmod of a device currently running as legacy
	Fix up the locking ready to allow rmmod of a pci driver
	Allow rmmod and hotplug at the controller level

Phase #3
	Complete splitting setup-pci functions into smaller bits of code
	and replace deep magic and callbacks with functions called from
	each driver. Get all the if device==foo out of the PCI code 	paths

Phase #4
	Do something about the ide_register/unregister end of the world
	and legacy chipset stuff. The PPC folks may tackle this in
	advance
	Get us to the point we can foo = ide_attach(); ide_remove(foo) 	
	for arbitary interfaces
	
And then (when the setup is turned the right way out and not before)
begin looking at turning the actual block I/O engine the right way out.
(That is driver calls helpers not midlayer and magic)

That should allow us to keep solid stable IDE along the way.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-21 23:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-21 18:38 2.5 IDE Whitepaper? PAUL BENNETT
2002-08-21 23:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-08-21 23:51   ` Alan Cox

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.