* loading modules
@ 2002-09-19 18:07 stefania magistrali
2002-09-20 11:25 ` Magnus Damm
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: stefania magistrali @ 2002-09-19 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Hi all!
I am working with a PowerPC 860T based board.
I have a problem with loading modules: I made:
make dep make clean make zImage make modules and make modules_install
to create my kernel and modules , but when I try to load the module
hdlc.o with insmod, I have a segmentation fault. I am using busybox
version 0.60.3 and linux version 2.4.19pre6. Here I send the last part
of the strace sequence of the command "insmod hdlc"
Can anyone help me?
Thanks very much in advance!
Stefania
query_module(NULL, 0, NULL, 0) = 0
query_module(NULL, QM_MODULES, { /* 0 entries */ }, 0) = 0
mmap(NULL, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x30033000
query_module(NULL, QM_SYMBOLS, 0x30032e08, 16384, 21866) = -1 ENOSPC (No
space left on device)
mmap(NULL, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x30037000
query_module(NULL, QM_SYMBOLS, { /* 961 entries */ }, 961) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: loading modules
2002-09-19 18:07 loading modules stefania magistrali
@ 2002-09-20 11:25 ` Magnus Damm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Damm @ 2002-09-20 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stefania magistrali; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
This might be related to a powerpc-specific bug in the busybox
insmod implementation. Try the 0.60.4 release or use this patch:
http://opensource.se/projects/busybox/busybox-0.60.3-insmod_rewrite.patch
/ magnus
stefania magistrali wrote:
>
> Hi all!
> I am working with a PowerPC 860T based board.
> I have a problem with loading modules: I made:
>
> make dep make clean make zImage make modules and make modules_install
>
> to create my kernel and modules , but when I try to load the module
> hdlc.o with insmod, I have a segmentation fault. I am using busybox
> version 0.60.3 and linux version 2.4.19pre6. Here I send the last part
> of the strace sequence of the command "insmod hdlc"
> Can anyone help me?
> Thanks very much in advance!
> Stefania
>
> query_module(NULL, 0, NULL, 0) = 0
> query_module(NULL, QM_MODULES, { /* 0 entries */ }, 0) = 0
> mmap(NULL, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
> 0) = 0x30033000
> query_module(NULL, QM_SYMBOLS, 0x30032e08, 16384, 21866) = -1 ENOSPC (No
> space left on device)
> mmap(NULL, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
> 0) = 0x30037000
> query_module(NULL, QM_SYMBOLS, { /* 961 entries */ }, 961) = 0
> --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
> +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* loading modules
@ 2002-02-19 12:44 blesson paul
2002-02-19 18:41 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: blesson paul @ 2002-02-19 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi all
I am a newbie to Kernel world. When I looked into the file system files,
I found that the initialization function ( where the file system is
registered) is init_filesystem where filesystem can be coda, vfat etc. As
far as know, the initialization function is
int init_module(void)
Then how kernel takes different initialization functions. I want to know
whether my know how is wrong or not
Thanking in advance
regards
Blesson Paul
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: loading modules
2002-02-19 12:44 blesson paul
@ 2002-02-19 18:41 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre P. Nunes @ 2002-02-19 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: blesson paul, linux-kernel
blesson paul wrote:
> Hi all
> I am a newbie to Kernel world. When I looked into the file system
> files, I found that the initialization function ( where the file
> system is registered) is "init_filesystem" where filesystem can be
> coda, vfat etc. As far as know, the initialization function is
> int init_module(void)
> Then how kernel takes different initialization functions. I want to
> know whether my know how is wrong or not
you have something like (function parameters supressed for simplifcation):
/* Kernel calls this in your module */
init_module()
{
do_something();
init_filesystem(...);
return whatever;
}
So the entry point for every kind of module, including filesystem
modules, is init_module(), you don't implement init_filesystem in the
module, you call it to let the kernel know you want to register a
filesystem.
>
> Thanking in advance
> regards
> Blesson Paul
Cheers,
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-20 11:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-19 18:07 loading modules stefania magistrali
2002-09-20 11:25 ` Magnus Damm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-19 12:44 blesson paul
2002-02-19 18:41 ` Alexandre P. Nunes
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.