From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Bill Hartner <hartner@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
mbligh@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and 2.5.35 + mm1
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:32:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D94A43B.49C65AE8@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D948EA6.A6EFC26B@austin.ibm.com
Bill Hartner wrote:
>
> ...
> 2.5.35 44693 86.1 1.45 1,982,236 KB 5,393,152 KB 7,375,388 KB
> 2.5.35mm1 39679 99.6 1.50 *2,720,600 KB *6,154,512 KB *8,875,112 KB
>
2.5.35 was fairly wretched from the swapout point of view.
Would be interesting to retest on 2.5.38-mm/2.5.39 sometime.
(This always happens, sorry. But stuff is changing fast)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-27 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-17 21:14 VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35, and 2.5.35 + mm1 Bill Hartner
2002-09-17 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-18 1:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 16:10 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and " Bill Hartner
2002-09-18 16:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 18:42 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 17:00 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35,and 2.5.35 " Bill Hartner
2002-09-27 18:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-10-02 18:51 ` VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, and 2.5.38 + mm3 Bill Hartner
2002-10-02 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 21:03 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 +mm1, " Andrew Morton
2002-10-02 20:59 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26 + rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, " Dave Hansen
2002-10-03 13:59 ` [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26+ " Bill Hartner
2002-10-03 16:43 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D94A43B.49C65AE8@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=hartner@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.