Re: [Lse-tech] Re: VolanoMark Benchmark results for 2.5.26, 2.5.26+ rmap, 2.5.35 + mm1, and 2.5.38 + mm3

[Bill Hartner <hartner@austin.ibm.com>]

Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> Bill Hartner wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >>Bill Hartner wrote:
> >>
> >>>...
> >>>2.5.35       44693  86.1 1.45        1,982,236 KB  5,393,152 KB  7,375,388 KB
> >>>2.5.35mm1    39679  99.6 1.50       *2,720,600 KB *6,154,512 KB *8,875,112 KB
> >>>
> >>
> >>2.5.35 was fairly wretched from the swapout point of view.
> >>Would be interesting to retest on 2.5.38-mm/2.5.39 sometime.
> >>
> >
> > Here are VolanoMark results for 2.5.38 and 2.5.38-mm3 for both
> > 3GB (memory pressure) and 4GB.  I will repeat for 2.5.40 mm1 or
> > what ever is the latest and greatest on Friday.
> 
> Could you possibly include profiling data as well?  oprofile would be
> preferred, but readprofile would be fine if you can get it.  We can
> guess what is causing the degredation, but profiles will offer some
> hard proof.

I will get 2.5.40 mm1 results and then get a profile before and after the
point that we start swapping.

I think that the ips driver may be bouncing here - so I would like to
resolve that 1st - could change results - possibly quite a bit.

Bill

> 
> --
> Dave Hansen
> haveblue@us.ibm.com

-- 
IBM Linux Technology Center Performance Team
bhartner@austin.ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/