All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mremap() pte allocation atomicity error
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:54:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D95442E.C0959F4A@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020928052813.GY22942@holomorphy.com

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 
> I'm working on something else atm.
> 
>  [<c01187b3>]__might_sleep+0x43/0x47
>  [<c013b6d4>]__alloc_pages+0x24/0x20c
>  [<c0133650>]file_read_actor+0x0/0x1b0
>  [<c01131ed>]pte_alloc_one+0x41/0x104
>  [<c012d05d>]pte_alloc_map+0x4d/0x210
>  [<c013bc73>]get_page_cache_size+0xf/0x18
>  [<c0135f38>]move_one_page+0xe8/0x328
>  [<c0136061>]move_one_page+0x211/0x328
>  [<c0130644>]vm_enough_memory+0x34/0xc0
>  [<c01361a9>]move_page_tables+0x31/0x7c
>  [<c0136860>]do_mremap+0x66c/0x7ec
>  [<c0136a30>]sys_mremap+0x50/0x73
>  [<c010748f>]syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> 

ooh, oww, ouch.   Look at move_one_page():

        src = get_one_pte_map_nested(mm, old_addr);
        if (src) {
                dst = alloc_one_pte_map(mm, new_addr);
                error = copy_one_pte(mm, src, dst);


get_one_pte_map_nested() does a kmap_atomic(), and then we go and
call alloc_one_pte_map->pte_alloc_map->pte_alloc_one->alloc_pages()
inside that kmap_atomic().

I guess that has been there since day one.

A simple fix would be to drop the atomic kmap of the source pte
and take it again after the alloc_one_pte_map() call.

Can you think of a more efficient way?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mremap() pte allocation atomicity error
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:54:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D95442E.C0959F4A@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020928052813.GY22942@holomorphy.com

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 
> I'm working on something else atm.
> 
>  [<c01187b3>]__might_sleep+0x43/0x47
>  [<c013b6d4>]__alloc_pages+0x24/0x20c
>  [<c0133650>]file_read_actor+0x0/0x1b0
>  [<c01131ed>]pte_alloc_one+0x41/0x104
>  [<c012d05d>]pte_alloc_map+0x4d/0x210
>  [<c013bc73>]get_page_cache_size+0xf/0x18
>  [<c0135f38>]move_one_page+0xe8/0x328
>  [<c0136061>]move_one_page+0x211/0x328
>  [<c0130644>]vm_enough_memory+0x34/0xc0
>  [<c01361a9>]move_page_tables+0x31/0x7c
>  [<c0136860>]do_mremap+0x66c/0x7ec
>  [<c0136a30>]sys_mremap+0x50/0x73
>  [<c010748f>]syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> 

ooh, oww, ouch.   Look at move_one_page():

        src = get_one_pte_map_nested(mm, old_addr);
        if (src) {
                dst = alloc_one_pte_map(mm, new_addr);
                error = copy_one_pte(mm, src, dst);


get_one_pte_map_nested() does a kmap_atomic(), and then we go and
call alloc_one_pte_map->pte_alloc_map->pte_alloc_one->alloc_pages()
inside that kmap_atomic().

I guess that has been there since day one.

A simple fix would be to drop the atomic kmap of the source pte
and take it again after the alloc_one_pte_map() call.

Can you think of a more efficient way?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-28  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-28  5:28 mremap() pte allocation atomicity error William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-28  5:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-28  5:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-09-28  5:54   ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-28  6:04   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-28  6:04     ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-28  6:10     ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-28  6:10       ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-07  8:58       ` mremap() pte allocation atomicity error (2.5.40 too) Miquel van Smoorenburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D95442E.C0959F4A@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.