From: "\"David Müller (ELSOFT AG)\"" <d.mueller@elsoft.ch>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: very minor 405GP and 405GPr PCI difference
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 09:46:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9AA452.5070004@elsoft.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021002014219.GF1848@zax
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:37:20AM +0200, "David M?ller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
>
[stuff deleted]
>>
>>In your proposed patch, i'm missing a way to install a board specify
>>mapping either by using special constants, callback functions to board
>>specific code, .... AFAICS all boards are forced to use the same mapping.
>
>
> That's right. Is there a reason for boards to have different
> mappings? I can well believe that there is, but the current tree
> doesn't show it - all the boards (in the tree) that have PCI appear to
> do the same initialisation of the windows. It doesn't seem worthwhile
> to create board specific PCI initialisation hooks until we have a
> board that needs it.
>
Not all boards using LinuxPPC are in the offical tree (yet). I know at
least two boards which are using a "non-standard" PCI mapping.
Dave
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-02 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-27 12:27 very minor 405GP and 405GPr PCI difference Ralph Blach
2002-09-30 4:01 ` David Gibson
2002-10-01 5:21 ` David Gibson
2002-10-01 8:37 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-02 1:42 ` David Gibson
2002-10-02 4:26 ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-02 5:34 ` David Gibson
2002-10-02 17:03 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-03 1:10 ` David Gibson
2002-10-03 15:14 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-04 2:48 ` David Gibson
2002-10-04 18:33 ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-08 4:17 ` David Gibson
2002-10-08 19:39 ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-09 2:14 ` David Gibson
[not found] ` <20021 <20021023040850.GC1198@zax>
2002-10-24 23:50 ` Ralph Blach
2002-10-25 1:19 ` David Gibson
2002-10-02 7:46 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" [this message]
2002-10-03 1:12 ` David Gibson
2002-10-03 8:28 ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-06 5:23 ` Andrew May
2002-10-07 1:31 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-08 4:14 ` David Gibson
2002-10-08 5:21 ` Andrew May
2002-10-08 14:56 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-08 17:31 ` Andrew May
2002-10-08 18:20 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-09 1:58 ` David Gibson
2002-10-09 10:35 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-10-09 15:21 ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-11 19:37 ` Andrew May
2002-10-14 1:20 ` David Gibson
2002-10-08 6:19 ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-08 15:18 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-09 2:10 ` David Gibson
2002-10-22 21:55 ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-23 4:08 ` David Gibson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-23 13:10 Ralph Blach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9AA452.5070004@elsoft.ch \
--to=d.mueller@elsoft.ch \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.