[linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[YongChul Kim]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 673 bytes --]

If your original reiserfs volume has problem,
you can not mount your snapshot volume, anywhere.

At that case, you must umount your reiserfs volume,
and run "reiserfsck".
If it is O.K., then you can mount your reiserfs volume,
re-create snapshot volume for that reiserfs original volume.
Now you can mount your snapshot volume.
Maybe OK, I successed.

BUT...
I have problem.
I do not want to unmount original reiserfs volume, because of running file system.
Reiserfs volume can not run "reiserfsck" with read/write mounted state, in my knowledge.

CAN WHO advise how can I run fsck for mounted reiserfs volume with read/write state ?

Yongchul Kim.




[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1758 bytes --]

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[Jon Bendtsen]

I use ext3, not reiserfs, so i cant help you.



JonB

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[Chris Abernethy]

Anyone have any pointers to good documentation on the difference between
the two with regards to LVM?

--Chris

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 09:48, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
> I use ext3, not reiserfs, so i cant help you.
> 
> 
> 
> JonB
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[Jon Bendtsen]

Chris Abernethy wrote:
> 
> Anyone have any pointers to good documentation on the difference between
> the two with regards to LVM?

Why do you think there is a difference with regards to LVM ?




JonB

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[Chris Abernethy]

I was wondering if there was a compelling LVM-related reason to choose
one over the other for use with LVM.

--Chris

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:56, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
> Chris Abernethy wrote:
> > 
> > Anyone have any pointers to good documentation on the difference between
> > the two with regards to LVM?
> 
> Why do you think there is a difference with regards to LVM ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> JonB
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[Jon Bendtsen]

Chris Abernethy wrote:
> 
> I was wondering if there was a compelling LVM-related reason to choose
> one over the other for use with LVM.

no, i dont think so.




JonB

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[Chris Jantzen]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Chris Abernethy wrote:
> I was wondering if there was a compelling LVM-related reason to choose
> one over the other for use with LVM.

When I originally evaluated journaled filesystems for use with LVM,
reiser had the best resize support (in both directions). I believe ext3
has caught up in that regard.

-- 
chris jantzen kb7rnl =->         __O
Insert witty comment here.     _`\<,_
http://www.maybe.net/         (*)/ (*)

Re: [linux-lvm] Re: mounting reiserfs snaphost fails

[Brian J. Murrell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 509 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:13:08PM -0700, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> 
> When I originally evaluated journaled filesystems for use with LVM,
> reiser had the best resize support (in both directions). I believe ext3
> has caught up in that regard.

Ext3 is not quite there yet.  Andreas (Dilger) has some (Alpha or
Beta) patches for online resizing of ext3 filesystem for the 2.4
kernel and I think I recall seeing ext3 online resizing it the last
2.5 kernel status update.

b.

-- 
Brian J. Murrell

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]