From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.5.40-mm2
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 13:47:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA0A144.8070301@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DA0854E.CF9080D7@digeo.com
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ingo said that his 2.4-based per-cpu-pages patch was beneficial to
> specweb, but nobody has tested these patches with specweb. Hint.
cc'ing Ingo, because I think this might be related to the timer bh
removal.
2.5.40 doesn't last very long under Specweb. It always dies out with
one of these oopses after a little while:
CPU: 3
EIP: 0060:[<801204a9>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010006
EIP is at run_timer_tasklet+0xcd/0x13c
eax: 00000000 ebx: 802657a8 ecx: e3c640a0 edx: 00000000
esi: e3c642c0 edi: 8039cae0 ebp: 00000246 esp: 8c3d9f20
ds: 0068 es: 0068 ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=8c3d8000 task=8c3dc760)
Stack: 8c093188 00000000 8c3d8000 00000001 8011d2e5 00000000 00000001
80399960
fffffffe 00000060 8037e324 8037e324 8011cfea 80399960 0000000c
00000003
00000000 00000000 00000046 801111dd 8c3d8000 80105334 00000000
80107a8a
Call Trace:
[<8011d2e5>] tasklet_hi_action+0x85/0xe0
[<8011cfea>] do_softirq+0x5a/0xac
[<801111dd>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x111/0x118
[<80105334>] poll_idle+0x0/0x48
[<80107a8a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[<80105334>] poll_idle+0x0/0x48
[<8010535d>] poll_idle+0x29/0x48
[<801053b3>] cpu_idle+0x37/0x48
[<801183ad>] printk+0x125/0x140
Code: 89 50 04 89 02 c7 06 00 00 00 00 c7 46 04 00 00 00 00 c7 46
I'll get a properly decoded one later. I think I just wrote over my
old vmlinux. But, it looks to me like this is somewhere inside
__run_timers() at kernel/timer.c :329, which looks something like this:
list_del(&timer->entry);
timer->base = NULL;
#if CONFIG_SMP
base->running_timer = timer;
#endif
kgdb kills this machine when kjournald is starting up. Time to try
kdb. I _really_ hate this POS hardware.
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.5.40-mm2
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 13:47:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA0A144.8070301@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DA0854E.CF9080D7@digeo.com
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ingo said that his 2.4-based per-cpu-pages patch was beneficial to
> specweb, but nobody has tested these patches with specweb. Hint.
cc'ing Ingo, because I think this might be related to the timer bh
removal.
2.5.40 doesn't last very long under Specweb. It always dies out with
one of these oopses after a little while:
CPU: 3
EIP: 0060:[<801204a9>] Not tainted
EFLAGS: 00010006
EIP is at run_timer_tasklet+0xcd/0x13c
eax: 00000000 ebx: 802657a8 ecx: e3c640a0 edx: 00000000
esi: e3c642c0 edi: 8039cae0 ebp: 00000246 esp: 8c3d9f20
ds: 0068 es: 0068 ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=8c3d8000 task=8c3dc760)
Stack: 8c093188 00000000 8c3d8000 00000001 8011d2e5 00000000 00000001
80399960
fffffffe 00000060 8037e324 8037e324 8011cfea 80399960 0000000c
00000003
00000000 00000000 00000046 801111dd 8c3d8000 80105334 00000000
80107a8a
Call Trace:
[<8011d2e5>] tasklet_hi_action+0x85/0xe0
[<8011cfea>] do_softirq+0x5a/0xac
[<801111dd>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x111/0x118
[<80105334>] poll_idle+0x0/0x48
[<80107a8a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[<80105334>] poll_idle+0x0/0x48
[<8010535d>] poll_idle+0x29/0x48
[<801053b3>] cpu_idle+0x37/0x48
[<801183ad>] printk+0x125/0x140
Code: 89 50 04 89 02 c7 06 00 00 00 00 c7 46 04 00 00 00 00 c7 46
I'll get a properly decoded one later. I think I just wrote over my
old vmlinux. But, it looks to me like this is somewhere inside
__run_timers() at kernel/timer.c :329, which looks something like this:
list_del(&timer->entry);
timer->base = NULL;
#if CONFIG_SMP
base->running_timer = timer;
#endif
kgdb kills this machine when kjournald is starting up. Time to try
kdb. I _really_ hate this POS hardware.
--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-06 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-06 18:47 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 18:47 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 20:47 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2002-10-06 20:47 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Dave Hansen
2002-10-06 21:55 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 21:55 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 22:07 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 22:07 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 22:11 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 22:11 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-07 5:46 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Dave Hansen
2002-10-07 5:46 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Dave Hansen
2002-10-06 22:23 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Robert Love
2002-10-06 22:23 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Robert Love
2002-10-06 22:33 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 22:33 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-06 22:38 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Robert Love
2002-10-06 22:38 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Robert Love
2002-10-08 11:05 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-08 11:05 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-08 16:23 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Dave Hansen
2002-10-08 16:23 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Dave Hansen
2002-10-08 16:43 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Dave Hansen
2002-10-08 16:43 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Dave Hansen
2002-10-08 16:56 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-08 16:56 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-09 8:12 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-09 8:12 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-07 17:45 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-07 17:45 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Badari Pulavarty
2002-10-07 17:55 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Jens Axboe
2002-10-07 17:55 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Jens Axboe
2002-10-07 18:23 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-10-07 18:23 ` 2.5.40-mm2 Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA0A144.8070301@us.ibm.com \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.