* [linux-lvm] Problem with vgscan and md
@ 2002-10-09 11:14 Luca Berra
2002-10-10 7:29 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Luca Berra @ 2002-10-09 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm; +Cc: riccardo_brusa
Hello,
I found a probable bug in vgscan up to LVM 1.0.5 due to lv device nodes
renumbering
i found the problem in a shared storage environment, but it can be
reproduced on a single machine
the problem can be reproduced with 2 md devices
create 2 vg each composed of 1 md device
let's say
VG /dev/vg00
Device 109:0
LV /dev/vg00/lvol1
Device 58:0
LV /dev/vg00/lvol2
Device 58:1
LV /dev/vg00/lvol3
Device 58:2
PV /dev/md0
VG /dev/vg01
Device 109:1
LV /dev/vg01/lvol1
Device 58:3
LV /dev/vg01/lvol2
Device 58:4
LV /dev/vg01/lvol3
Device 58:5
PV /dev/md1
now deactivate all VGs
raidstop /dev/md0
run vgscan -v
you have
VG /dev/vg01
Device 109:0
LV /dev/vg01/lvol1
Device 58:0
LV /dev/vg01/lvol2
Device 58:1
LV /dev/vg01/lvol3
Device 58:2
PV /dev/md1
vgchange -a y /dev/vg01
now raidstart /dev/md0
you need to run vgcan again, to see vg00
vgscan renumbers device node for vg00 so you get
VG /dev/vg00
Device 109:0
LV /dev/vg00/lvol1
Device 58:0
LV /dev/vg00/lvol2
Device 58:1
LV /dev/vg00/lvol3
Device 58:2
PV /dev/md0
vgscan cannot renumber device nodes for vg01 (which is active) so you
also get
VG /dev/vg01
Device 109:0
LV /dev/vg01/lvol1
Device 58:0
LV /dev/vg01/lvol2
Device 58:1
LV /dev/vg01/lvol3
Device 58:2
PV /dev/md1
so we got two DIFFERENT vgs with the SAME device files
the need to run vgscan is due to having a shared storage so i might want
to activate the md devices and vg devices on different nodes
Regards,
Luca
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Problem with vgscan and md
2002-10-09 11:14 [linux-lvm] Problem with vgscan and md Luca Berra
@ 2002-10-10 7:29 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Heinz J . Mauelshagen @ 2002-10-10 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
Luca,
I tried to reproduce this here with the 1.0.5 and failed.
1.0.5 vgscan only changes minors if there's minor # clashes _and_ if it
is run with option "-f" in order to keep minors persistent by default.
So I deativated all VGs and stopped the device for the first one.
There was no reason for vgscan to reallocate the device minors because
there's no clash. After starting the device again and running vgscan,
both VGs were accessable fine.
An automatic reallocation of device numbers took place in vgscan up
to version 1.0.
Maybe this is an older tool version?
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 06:13:49PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
> Hello,
> I found a probable bug in vgscan up to LVM 1.0.5 due to lv device nodes
> renumbering
>
> i found the problem in a shared storage environment, but it can be
> reproduced on a single machine
>
> the problem can be reproduced with 2 md devices
> create 2 vg each composed of 1 md device
> let's say
> VG /dev/vg00
> Device 109:0
> LV /dev/vg00/lvol1
> Device 58:0
> LV /dev/vg00/lvol2
> Device 58:1
> LV /dev/vg00/lvol3
> Device 58:2
> PV /dev/md0
>
> VG /dev/vg01
> Device 109:1
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol1
> Device 58:3
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol2
> Device 58:4
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol3
> Device 58:5
> PV /dev/md1
>
> now deactivate all VGs
> raidstop /dev/md0
> run vgscan -v
>
> you have
>
> VG /dev/vg01
> Device 109:0
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol1
> Device 58:0
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol2
> Device 58:1
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol3
> Device 58:2
> PV /dev/md1
>
> vgchange -a y /dev/vg01
>
> now raidstart /dev/md0
>
> you need to run vgcan again, to see vg00
>
> vgscan renumbers device node for vg00 so you get
>
> VG /dev/vg00
> Device 109:0
> LV /dev/vg00/lvol1
> Device 58:0
> LV /dev/vg00/lvol2
> Device 58:1
> LV /dev/vg00/lvol3
> Device 58:2
> PV /dev/md0
>
> vgscan cannot renumber device nodes for vg01 (which is active) so you
> also get
>
> VG /dev/vg01
> Device 109:0
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol1
> Device 58:0
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol2
> Device 58:1
> LV /dev/vg01/lvol3
> Device 58:2
> PV /dev/md1
>
> so we got two DIFFERENT vgs with the SAME device files
>
> the need to run vgscan is due to having a shared storage so i might want
> to activate the md devices and vg devices on different nodes
>
> Regards,
> Luca
>
>
> --
> Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-10 7:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-09 11:14 [linux-lvm] Problem with vgscan and md Luca Berra
2002-10-10 7:29 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.