[BK] ReiserFS v3 changesets resend

[BK] ReiserFS v3 changesets resend

[Hans Reiser]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1 bytes --]



[-- Attachment #2: Please send to Linus --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4885 bytes --]

From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
To: reiser@namesys.com
Subject: Please send to Linus
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:07:09 +0400
Message-ID: <20021009130709.A23353@namesys.com>

Hello!

   It seems our first attempt of sending these to Linus have failed,
   here is another one.

Bye,
    Oleg

    reiserfs updates:

    These first two changesets contain fixes for reiserfs. They fix issue with
    handling of displacing_large_files allocator option and a problem with
    remounting from readwrite to readwrite mode if FS holds some deleted but
    not yet closed files.

    Next three changesets implement reiserfs_file_write. Also third one
    exports generic_osync_inode,block_commit_write and remove_suid
    because these are now needed for reiserfs.
    There was no reiserfs_file_write in the 2.4 port of reiserfs
    (and Hans was very unhappy about it).
    With current 'one block at a time' algorithm, writes past the end of a file
    are slow because each new file block is separately added into the tree
    causing shifting of other items which is CPU expensive.
    With this new implementation if you write into file with big enough chunks,
    it uses half as much CPU. Also this version is more SMP friendly than
    the current one.

    Next four changesets replace recently added lock_kernels with
    reiserfs wrappers (that would eventually evolve into real separate
    locks), includes more C99 designated initialisers cleanups (this time
    from Art Haas) and updates some reiserfs help entries. Also fixing a
    buglet in reiserfs_file_write code discovered during some 2.4.20-pre
    testing.

    You can pull these from bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser3-linux-2.5

Diffstats:
 fs/reiserfs/inode.c         |    2 +-
 include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

 super.c |    6 +++++-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

 do_balan.c        |  105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 inode.c           |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++----
 tail_conversion.c |    5 +-
 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)

 fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c           |   21
 fs/reiserfs/file.c             | 1080 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 fs/reiserfs/inode.c            |    4
 fs/reiserfs/super.c            |    1
 include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h    |    1
 include/linux/reiserfs_fs_sb.h |    1
 6 files changed, 1104 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

 kernel/ksyms.c |    3 +++
 mm/filemap.c   |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

 journal.c |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

 dir.c   |    6 +++---
 inode.c |   14 +++++++-------
 namei.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 super.c |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

 Config.help |   33 ++++++++++++---------------------
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

 file.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


ChangeSet@1.664, 2002-10-02 22:16:12+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  Small buglet in reiserfs_file_write fixed, that was found during 2.4 stage testing, but somehow it was lost in 2.5 version

ChangeSet@1.663, 2002-10-01 17:29:34+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  Update reiserfs config help entries.

ChangeSet@1.662, 2002-10-01 17:13:13+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  reiserfs: C99 designated initializers, by Art Haas

ChangeSet@1.661, 2002-10-01 17:12:19+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  lock_kernel is replaced with per superblock lock (kind of)

ChangeSet@1.660, 2002-10-01 17:11:32+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  export generic_osync_inode,block_commit_write, remove_suid

ChangeSet@1.659, 2002-10-01 17:09:56+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  reiserfs_file_write() implemenation. Ported from 2.4

ChangeSet@1.658, 2002-10-01 17:08:55+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  reiserfs: Implement insertion of more than one unformatted pointer insertion at a time. Considerably speedup hole creation.

ChangeSet@1.657, 2002-10-01 17:07:40+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  reiserfs: Fix a problem with delayed unlinks and remounting RW filesystem RW.

ChangeSet@1.656, 2002-10-01 17:06:40+04:00, green@angband.namesys.com
  reiserfs: Take into account file information even when not doing preallocation. Fixes a bug with displacing_large_files option.

Re: [BK] ReiserFS v3 changesets resend

[Jeff Garzik]

Hans Reiser wrote:
>     You can pull these from bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser3-linux-2.5
> 
> Diffstats:
>  fs/reiserfs/inode.c         |    2 +-
>  include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h |    3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
>  super.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>  do_balan.c        |  105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>  inode.c           |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>  tail_conversion.c |    5 +-
>  3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)


You guys need to use a better format for emailing Linus...  see his 
posts on the subject, or just use Documentation/BK-usage/bk-make-sum 
script.  Having N diffstat outputs followed by N changeset descriptions 
is just non-sensical.  Linus should not need to count down diffstats to 
figure out which one corresponds to which changeset.

Further, an overall [single] diffstat gives a better picture of what he 
will pull when he does a 'bk pull'...

	Jeff

Re: [BK] ReiserFS v3 changesets resend

[Jeff Chua]

Hans,

Please post your patches to lkml in one big file so that we can apply the
patch. Don't know how to access
bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser3-linux-2.5

Thanks,
Jeff.



On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
Hello!

   It seems our first attempt of sending these to Linus have failed,
   here is another one.

Bye,
    Oleg

    reiserfs updates:

Re: [BK] ReiserFS v3 changesets resend

[Hans Reiser]

Jeff Chua wrote:

>Hans,
>
>Please post your patches to lkml in one big file so that we can apply the
>patch. Don't know how to access
>bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser3-linux-2.5
>
>Thanks,
>Jeff.
>
>
>
>On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Hans Reiser wrote:
>Hello!
>
>   It seems our first attempt of sending these to Linus have failed,
>   here is another one.
>
>Bye,
>    Oleg
>
>    reiserfs updates:
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Oleg sent only the changesets on the resend, since he figured that 
everyone but Linus would have applied it after the first send, and they 
could look through the archives if not.  I sort of suspected that was 
too logical to be true.;-) We'll send the full patch in the future.  I 
don't really like the idea of doing anything in a way that makes people 
feel disadvantaged unless they use bk.  Oleg, send Jeff the patch.

Hans