* vrrp question posted on keepalived.org
@ 2002-10-09 17:45 craig e. smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: craig e. smith @ 2002-10-09 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
i am also going to post this here, as it may be a vrrp iptables issue:
i am setting up a redundant firewall solution using keepalived(vrrp) and
iptables. i use iptables snat to change the source of the traffic from
the firewall to the vrrp virtual address:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.208.69
my question, why don't the vrrp advertisements get snat'ed? not that i
want them to, i don't. but by not specifying a protocol in the above
iptables statement all traffic leaving the box should get snat'ed,
right? any help with this is appreciated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-10-09 17:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-09 17:45 vrrp question posted on keepalived.org craig e. smith
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.